Posts with tag: buy to let investors

HMRC debating new tax regime for smaller BTL investors

Published On: August 16, 2016 at 11:04 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

HM Revenue & Customs has moved to launch a 12-week consultation on a scheme which it claims will improve the simplicity of tax demands levied on lesser-scale buy-to-let investors.

The new proposal, if agreed, will see buy-to-let landlords with an annual rental income of below £10,000 not permitted to keep their business records digitally. In addition, landlords falling into this category will not have to provide quarterly updates to HMRC.

However, they will still be obliged to utilise the so-called ‘optional cash basis.’

Alterations

If the proposal receives approval, it is likely to be introduced in the Finance Bill 2017, for full implementation in 2018 or later.

Through its wide-ranging digitisation programme Making Tax Digital, HMRC had been banking on landlords to utilise specialist software in order to keep detailed business records. These would then be submitted quarterly.

HMRC debating new tax regime for smaller BTL investors

HMRC debating new tax regime for smaller BTL investors

The cash basis option will only be made available to simple property businesses. These include individual landlords and partnerships where partners are individuals.

This said, a statement from HMRC noted, ‘the option to use the cash basis will make budgeting for tax easier for landlords allowing them to better manage cashflows.’[1]

Under the cash basis, buy-to-let landlords would only be permitted to declare their rental income for cash actually received. As part of the digital quarterly accounting scheme, they would be required to include the income that their tenants should have paid as income for the year-even if this rent had not been paid.

[1] https://www.lettingagenttoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2016/8/hmrc-mulling-easier-tax-regime-for-small-scale-buy-to-let-owners

 

 

Buy-to-let investors looking North

Published On: July 12, 2016 at 10:44 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

A new report has revealed that buy-to-let investors’ rush to beat the Stamp Duty deadline saw property prices in Britain’s largest 20 cities rise at the highest rate for 12 years.

During the opening quarter of 2016, house price growth in these UK cities reached 10.8%, which outstripped the 8.7% recorded in the rest of Britain.

City rises

Liverpool, Cardiff and Southampton saw some of the largest quarterly price rises, as investors searched for cheaper cities in which to invest. The largest house price rises during the quarter were recorded in Liverpool and London, where prices rose by 4.1%.

A typical home in Liverpool is valued at £113,100 and in London £468,100.

Cardiff saw the second largest rises at 3.5%, with Bristol and Southampton seeing increases of 3.3%. However, the smallest rises were recorded in Belfast and Newcastle, where prices rose by just 0.9%.

Savvy investors

Peter Armistead, of Armistead Property Ltd, believes that the most savvy investors will be looking to the North of England. Here, yields are a typically higher, with lower capital investment.

Armistead noted, ‘though London gives investors unparalled capital growth, it comes at a cost. Yields in the capital are not as good as many other cities and property prices are very high. Investors buying in the north can acquire two to three properties for the price of one in London. Landlords that are looking to invest, post the stamp duty rise, will be looking carefully at any investment, to ensure it maximises profits.’[1]

Manchester and Liverpool deliver some of the best rental yields in the UK, with Manchester recording average annual rental yields of 6.02% over five years, followed by Liverpool with 5.15% yields. An average residential property in Manchester is just £155,000, while a flat in a good area, costs as little as £120,000,’ he continued.[1]

Buy-to-let investors looking North

Buy-to-let investors looking North

Northern Stars

Mr Armistead went on to observe that, ‘A property in Manchester can provide a 5% minimum cash rental yield and a typical 12% total cash yield, including 7% capital appreciation.  Demand for rental accommodation is strong and by comparison with other regions, housing is cheaper.’[1]

In comparison, yields in London and the South-East are much lower – around an average of 4.86% in outer London and 4.71% in the City, according to LendInvest. House prices in London are about five times what they are in parts of the North West, but salaries are only 30% higher.’[1]

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/landlords/btl-investment-driven-north-by-rising-city-prices.html

 

 

Could the North offer best post-Brexit yields?

Published On: July 6, 2016 at 8:59 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

A new report has indicated that following the historic Brexit vote in the EU referendum, buy-to-let investors should look to invest in Northern locations, rather than the capital.

Research conducted by Assetz Property suggests that landlords could receive greater returns by investing in the property market in the North of England.

Rental yields

Buy-to-let landlords purchasing through Assetz Property can achieve yields of 8.5% in Leeds through their investment properties. Gross yields in London currently stand at only 3.5%.

Disposable income levels in Leeds are also way above those seen in the capital. The typical London salary is currently £40,087, meaning renters are left with an average of just £6,607 of disposable income. This is before features such as bills, food and travel expenses have been sorted out.

In Yorkshire however, despite the average yearly salary standing at over £10,000 less than in London, typical rent is just £11,244 per year.

Could the North offer best post-Brexit yields?

Could the North offer best post-Brexit yields?

Reliable returns

Stuart Law, CEO at Assetz Property, notes, ‘with house prices in London set to drop and interest rates due to fall on savings following Mark Carney’s strong indication of an imminent base rate drop, investors should concentrate on yields and the monthly return on their investment. The potential relocation of thousands or tens of thousands of highly paid city workers to Paris, Frankfurt or Dublin who might have once lived or rented in London can only have a negative effect on the City, while the market in Leeds is likely to be far more stable.’[1]

‘Not only is it a fantastic draw for investors, as properties are, on average, more than £400,000 cheaper here than in London, but it is an ideal location for residents looking to get more for their money and achieve a higher standard of living than they could have in London for a lot less money,’ he add

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/landlords/should-investors-shun-london-for-the-north.html

 

 

How Will Brexit Affect the London Property Market?

Published On: June 30, 2016 at 9:57 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

Last week, the country decided to leave the EU. How will the Brexit affect the London property market?

The vote to leave has left the London property market in a state of uncertainty, making buyers, vendors and landlords hesitant about what move to make next. It is believed that homeowners are feeling discouraged from selling following the decision.

But how will London react to the Brexit? London estate agent Portico’s Regional Director, Mark Lawrinson, and representative of the National Landlords Association (NLA), Richard Blanco, give their predictions:

What was happening in the London property market pre-Brexit?

Lawrinson explains: “The prime central London market was showing signs of a slowdown prior to the referendum, and in areas of central London, we had seen prices start to soften following a decline in the number of transactions. However, for London as a whole, most analysts were still forecasting modest growth with hotspots created by infrastructure projects like Crossrail helping to significantly increase values in boroughs like Ealing.”

Will Brexit affect house prices?

There is an argument that the weaker pound will help stimulate demand from overseas investors. Although the pound has weakened, the euro has also lost ground, so the exchange rate benefit of Brexit is likely to apply to investors with currencies tied to the dollar – notably from Asia and the Far East.

How Will Brexit Affect the London Property Market?

How Will Brexit Affect the London Property Market?

However, one of the main attractions for overseas investors to the capital (especially those from outside of Europe) is that London represents a safe haven and a good place to secure assets. Given current levels of uncertainty, it is difficult to determine whether this is still true, and there is a risk that this may diminish demand from these investors, at least in the short term.

There is no doubt that anyone in the process of buying a property may be feeling some hesitation. However, the same is almost certainly true for those selling as well, as in many cases, sellers are also buyers. If this means that both supply and demand will drop simultaneously, then house prices may not be affected as much as people fear.

Lawrinson comments: “Outside prime central London, the market is driven by domestic buyers rather than investors, who will still need somewhere to live regardless of our status outside the EU. They will also continue to need to upsize as their circumstances change, and we expect this market to be relatively unaffected by Brexit.”

In the short term, Portico does not expect to see an immediate drop in prices across London, although the decrease in prime central London prices that began pre-Brexit is likely to continue.

Will interest rates drop? 

Blanco highlights that there have been rumours of the Bank of England lowering interest rates to 0.25%, which could help generate more demand from buyers.

However, with rates already at an all-time low, “changes like this are unlikely to be made in the short-term,” says Blanco. “The markets are still volatile and people will be waiting to see what happens over the coming months.”

The full statement from the Bank of England following Friday’s announcement is here: /bank-england-releases-statement-following-eu-referendum-result/

How will the lettings market react? 

It is possible that the rental sector may see a boost in the short term, as people look to rent for longer in times of economic uncertainty. This was certainly witnessed in the prime central London market pre-EU referendum.

If this happens now, rent prices could go up, which would, in turn, attract landlords to the market.

Blanco notes: “Interestingly, if Boris, who was broadly pro-landlord as London Mayor, becomes the leader of the Conservatives and then Prime Minister, it’s possible that the aggressive stance the Government has taken recently with tax changes to buy-to-let investments could be reviewed.”

With a new Prime Minister unlikely to be appointed until autumn, changes to taxation for landlords are unlikely to happen anytime soon. Despite the less favourable tax hikes for buy-to-let investors, the lettings market has experienced steady growth so far this year, and Portico expects this to continue post-Brexit.

With improvements to transport across the capital, there are more options for tenants commuting into central London. If you are thinking of investing in the capital, this guide will help you find the right tenants in the right areas: /london-landlord-find-tenants-area/

It is now more important than ever for buyers and investors to buy the right properties. Always research the best areas for strong capital growth and the highest rental yields.

UK rents rising quicker than in London

Published On: June 2, 2016 at 1:22 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

Typical rents for single rooms in Britain are increasing at a faster rate than those in London, according to a new report by spareroom.co.uk.

The rental platform says that UK rents outside of the English capital were 5% greater in the first quarter of this year, in comparison to the same period in 2015.

Rents rising

In London, rental growth for single bedrooms was just 1.63%, according to spareroom.co.uk’s 2016 Rental Index.

The largest rental increases in the first quarter of 2016 were recorded in Luton, Swindon, Reading and Bristol.

At the other end of the scale, the cheapest average rents for single rooms were in Belfast, Bradford, Dundee and Sunderland.

Increase in supply

Spareroom.co.uk indicates that when comparing the results from Q1 of 2016 against the same period last year, supply of rental rooms has increased by 25%.

This is down to a number of additional properties coming onto the market, as investors surged to beat the stamp duty surcharge deadline.

Further analysis of the Index shows that Belfast and Harlow have the largest competition for rooms, with an average of nine people searching per listing in each of these regions.

Matt Hutchinson, director of SpareRoom, noted, ‘the first quarter of 2016 saw some respite for renters, thanks to an upturn in supply as buy-to-let investors rushed to complete ahead of the stamp duty increase.’[1]

UK rents rising quicker than in London

UK rents rising quicker than in London

Weight of demand

Hutchinson went on to say however that the rental market is still struggling under the weight of demand, particularly in London.

‘Even cities like Manchester and Birmingham, which offers some of the highest levels of supply for renters in the UK, are massively oversubscribed with six tenants competing for every room, he noted.[1]

[1] https://www.lettingagenttoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2016/6/rents-across-the-country-rising-faster-than-in-london

Stamp Duty Surcharge Boosts Revenue for Government

Published On: May 25, 2016 at 9:20 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,,

The 3% Stamp Duty surcharge for buy-to-let landlords and second homebuyers has boosted revenue for the Government, according to new data from HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC).

Due to the 1st April deadline, the highest ever Stamp Duty revenue for a single month was recorded last month.

Stamp Duty Surcharge Boosts Revenue for Government

Stamp Duty Surcharge Boosts Revenue for Government

The figures show that the Government generated almost £1.2 billion of Stamp Duty in April from a total of 173,430 property transactions in March, largely fuelled by high activity in the buy-to-let sector.

Nimesh Shah, a partner at London-based chartered accountants Blick Rothenberg, says it was “inevitable” that April would be an exceptional month for Stamp Duty revenue, as buy-to-let landlords rushed to beat the surcharge.

“Changes in the tax system lead to behavioural change, and the advance warning by the Government that Stamp Duty would increase for second purchases from 1st April 2016 is certainly evidence of opportunistic buyers wanting to beat the tax rise,” claims Shah.

This guide will help you understand how the tax change will affect you: https://www.justlandlords.co.uk/news/landlords-guide-stamp-duty-surcharge/

Although property transactions surged in March – ahead of the deadline – significantly fewer homes changed hands in April.

Between March and April, the number of property transactions dropped by a huge 45%, as landlords avoided paying the higher tax rate.

Assistant Manager at Blick Rothenberg, Paul Haywood-Schiefer, comments: “With the rush to get these transactions completed in April, it is inevitable there will be a slowdown in the market in the months ahead. Following this major upheaval in the tax, it will be interesting to see how property transactions and Stamp Duty receipts fare over the next few months, as the housing market relaxes itself. Those looking to purchase an additional property will be contemplating the increased Stamp Duty costs, while those with two properties may not want to sell, knowing they will have additional Stamp Duty to fund on replacing the second property.

“For now, the overall effect on the Treasury is positive, as Stamp Duty receipts for the previous 12 months, which hit £11 billion, have totalled almost as much as capital gains tax and inheritance tax put together, at £11.7 billion, and further demonstrates how the tax on property has boosted the Treasury revenues. It has also addressed an area in which the Government had expected to lose out.”