Posts with tag: buy to let investors

Another Buy-to-Let Lender Tightens Criteria

Published On: December 10, 2015 at 3:56 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,

Another Buy-to-Let Lender Tightens Criteria

Another Buy-to-Let Lender Tightens Criteria

Godiva Mortgages, part of Coventry Building Society, has announced that it is introducing tougher criteria for buy-to-let landlords.

At present, Godiva requires buy-to-let borrowers to have a rental cover of at least 125%, with the interest rate calculated at 5%, regardless of the pay rate.

However, landlords with a deposit of less than 35% will now be required to have rental cover of 125%, calculated on a higher rate of 5.5%.

For those taking out a five-year fixed rate deal, the change will not apply.

The announcement arrives after the Bank of England (BoE) released a report that suggests it may intervene in the buy-to-let market. This could come in the form of new affordability rules or lending caps.

Barclays has already tightened its lending criteria for buy-to-let borrowers. It recently raised the rental cover required by landlords from 125% to 135%, calculated on a pay rate of 5.79%. Find out more here: /barclays-is-first-major-lender-to-tighten-buy-to-let-criteria/

SPF Private Clients’ Mark Harris predicts: “The market is moving towards a situation where only those with a 50% deposit are likely to qualify for a loan.”1

What do you think of the changes and will these affect your future investments? Keep up to date with all things buy-to-let finance at LandlordNews.co.uk.

1 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/buy-to-let/12027732/Buy-to-let-investors-will-need-50pc-deposit-or-no-mortgage.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Controversial Landlords Sell Their Empire

Published On: December 10, 2015 at 10:19 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Arguably the most controversial buy-to-let landlords in the country, Fergus and Judith Wilson have sold off their property empire.

It is claimed that the couple sold 900 homes in Kent for £250m to individual and institutional foreign investors.

The deal has yet to complete, but means that they must repay around £80m in interest-only mortgages. Fergus Wilson states that the properties were sold at market value.

In a statement to The Guardian, Wilson says: “We reached an agreement today with a consortium of buyers to sell our entire portfolio for a figure exceeding £250m. The consortium is foreign and not of any one specific nationality.”

He adds that prices for homes on his estates “have been rising due to the shortage of available properties on the market”, but he insists that he has “taken steps to ensure the property prices in Ashford, Maidstone and Folkestone are not adversely affected”1 and that the sale will make no difference to existing tenants.

The Wilsons sold 100 properties of their 1,000-home portfolio in June to Chinese and Indian investors for about £25m.

The couple, both ex-maths teachers, previously tried to sell their portfolio in 2008, but were not successful. During the last economic crash, falling house prices meant that they had to stay in the market to meet mortgage payments of around £350,000 per month.

Wilson, 67, claims that he would not be able to get these mortgage deals now: “You couldn’t do now what I did. It’s partly because they will not lend at the higher levels of before. If I was starting again, I’d be pushed to get a 75% loan as a landlord.”2 

The Wilsons began building up their empire in the mid-1990s, at some stages buying several properties a day.

They have long been controversial, with Wilson evicting all tenants on housing benefit last year, in favour of Eastern European tenants. He was also fined after being found guilty of assaulting an estate agent.

The couple will not completely leave the sector, saying they will keep ten properties.

1 http://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/dec/09/fergus-wilson-sells-buy-to-let-property-empire-foreign-consortium-landlord

2 http://www.propertyindustryeye.com/sold-britains-most-controversial-buy-to-let-landlords-finally-sell-up/

 

Stamp Duty hike will redraw BTL investment map

Published On: December 9, 2015 at 11:44 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,

Countrywide is the latest group to raise concerns over the forthcoming three percent hike in stamp duty on buy-to-let properties.

The company believes that the changes will effectively redraw the map for investors looking for the greatest returns.

Increases

Fionnualla Earley, Countrywide’s chief economist, said, ‘the effect of the new duty will be to effectively increase the price investors pay and hence reduce the yield they achieve. New landlords must do their sums more carefully to make sure returns on investment add up.’[1]

Research by Countrywide published in the Sunday Times shows their offices in the West Midlands sold 16.7% of their homes to buy-to-let investors-the greatest proportion of any region in England.

However, some individual cities outside of this area saw much bigger shares of their on-sale stock purchased by investors. These are likely to see their markets more significantly affected should the stamp duty hikes deter many from buying next April.

Stamp Duty hike will redraw BTL investment map

Stamp Duty hike will redraw BTL investment map

Regional concern

There is certainly concern amongst buy-to-let landlords that the rises in tax will have a substantial negative effect on the sector. In Leeds, 41% of the total number of Countrywide’s sales in the year to October were to buy-to-let investors. In Southampton, this proportion was 38% and in Harrow 35%. Plymouth and Calderdale followed with 34%.

Earley noted that, ‘while the region with the higest proportion of investors is the West Midlands, the highest concentrations of investors are spread more widely across the country.’[1]

Investors concerned about the rising stamp duty costs should visit Landlord News’ Stamp Duty Calculator to see just how much the changes will affect them.

[1] https://www.lettingagenttoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2015/12/new-stamp-duty-may-redraw-buy-to-let-investment-map-says-countrywide

 

 

 

What Will Stamp Duty Changes Mean for London Landlords?

Published On: December 3, 2015 at 5:14 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

It is believed that the property market will see a rush of buy-to-let investors and second home buyers purchasing property before the increase in Stamp Duty in April. However, experts also warn that existing landlords may sell their portfolios.

In his Autumn Statement, Chancellor George Osborne announced that buy-to-let investors and second home buyers will pay much higher Stamp Duty costs from April next year – they will be charged an additional 3% on existing rates.

For those buying a £400,000 property, Stamp Duty will rise from £10,000 to £22,000 and from £5,000 to £14,000 on a £300,000 house.

More expensive properties will incur tens of thousands of pounds in extra tax.

The Association of Residential Letting Agents (ARLA) believes the additional tax will have a disastrous effect on the private rental sector. It believes that the increase will deter new landlords from entering the market, worsening the shortage of properties to let and pushing up rent prices.

What Will Stamp Duty Changes Mean for London Landlords?

What Will Stamp Duty Changes Mean for London Landlords?

Head of Residential Research at Savills, Lucian Cook, claims that the areas of London already hit by Stamp Duty increases introduced a year ago will be among the most impacted by the latest rise.

He adds: “The likelihood is that this will further suppress transactions and prices in the prime central London market, given the extent to which this market has been supported by purchases from second homeowners and investor-buyers.”1

However, in the short-term, Cook says it is highly likely that some landlords will bring forward their planned purchases before the April deadline.

To avoid paying the additional tax, landlords and second home buyers must, in most cases, have to complete their purchase before 1st April 2016. However, off-plan buyers, which exchanged before the Autumn Statement and won’t complete until after 1st April, will not have to pay the extra charge, according to the Treasury.

Mortgage broker John Charcol’s Ray Boulger believes that with four months before the changes take effect, there could be a rush to buy, as “anyone already thinking of purchasing a buy-to-let or second home will start actively looking”.

However, he warns that this short-term rise in demand could temporarily drive up prices, before they drop again when the charge is enforced: “Buyers need to be careful that price falls after April don’t wipe out the 3% saving they make by rushing to buy now.”

The next few months could also experience a surge in landlords selling their portfolios, notes Rachael Griffin, of investment firm Old Mutual Wealth. The rise in Stamp Duty could be “the final nail in the coffin” for some investors, she warns, following the previous announcement to cut buy-to-let mortgage interest tax relief.

Unlike homeowners, landlords can offset mortgage interest against their rental income to reduce their tax bill. However, the summer Budget revealed that tax relief will be cut to the 20% basic rate, which will be phased in from April 2017.

Although this reduction is expected to raise more than £1 billion in tax by 2021, it could cause some landlords to make a loss.

Additionally, the wear and tear allowance is being revised from April and an earlier deadline for paying Capital Gains Tax (CGT) is due to be implemented.

Boulger comments: “Combining the other tax changes with the 3% Stamp Duty surcharge, it’s easy to see this is an attack on small landlords. Inevitably, some will sell out or not expand their portfolios.”

He also believes that there could be further tax changes for landlords in the future: “Chancellors rarely stop at the first bite of the cherry.”1 

The Treasury will now consult on the details of the Stamp Duty increase, including a possible exemption for firms with large portfolios of rental property.

Experts also hope for a number of grey areas to be clarified, such as the tax on those who temporarily own two properties because they are bridging and of unmarried couples that buy an investment property.

How will all of these financial changes affect your buy-to-let business? Use our Stamp Duty calculator to see how much you will be charged on a new property purchase: /calculator/ 

1 http://www.homesandproperty.co.uk/property-news/will-stamp-duty-hike-turn-buy-to-let-into-buy-to-fret-in-the-capital-a93436.html

Buy-to-let investors looking for lower value homes

Published On: November 26, 2015 at 3:53 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

New research indicates that buy-to-let investors are looking for lower-value properties, in an attempt to gain higher yields.

The latest Mortgage Search Tracker from the Mortgage Advice Bureau shows seven in ten landlords are actively searching for a mortgage on properties valued at less than £250,000. This indicated a sharp rise from the five out of ten recorded one year earlier.

Falling rates

A growing number of landlords are choosing higher loan-to-value (LTV) mortgages, with interest rates continuing to tumble. One in three landlords are looking for mortgages on properties with a value of less than £150,000.

This trend comes as house prices continue to rise, up by 5.2% over the last year. In London, the South East, South West and East of England, average property prices are more than £250,000.

Buy-to-let investors looking for lower value homes

Buy-to-let investors looking for lower value homes

‘As rental demand remains strong nationwide, opting for a cheaper property can result in more attractive yields,’ noted Brian Murphy, head of lending at the Mortgage Advice Bureau.[1]

‘It appears many landlords are looking to invest in areas outside the South of England, where property prices won’t hold them back from making a profit,’ he added.[1]

Murphy went on to say that buy-to-let investors are reaping the rewards of more competitive pricing. ‘Although higher LTVs generally mean more costly monthly repayments, falling rates mean landlords may find they can now afford higher-LTV products,’ he concluded. [1]

[1] https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2015/11/landlords-targeting-cheaper-properties

 

 

 

First Time Buyers Competing with Landlords for Small Homes

Published On: October 19, 2015 at 2:05 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,

A new asking price record has been set, as first time buyers compete with buy-to-let landlords for smaller homes, according to the latest report from Rightmove.

The average asking price of a property coming onto the market is now £296,549, up 0.6% on last month and 5.6% over the year.

The property portal states that first time buyers and investors are going head-to-head over homes with up to two bedrooms.

First Time Buyers Competing with Landlords for Small Homes

First Time Buyers Competing with Landlords for Small Homes

It reports that asking prices for these properties are up 4.9% on a monthly basis and 9.6% higher than last year.

However, supply of smaller homes has fallen by 8% on 2014 levels.

Nationally, excluding inner London, the average asking price of a smaller home is now £184,676.

The average second-stepper property coming onto the market costs £247,004, indicating a huge financial leap for second time buyers.

The typical top-of-the-ladder home has an asking price of £530,457.

Although new asking price records have been set, the rate of growth has slowed, marking the lowest October increase since 2010.

Rightmove has found that a “vicious circle” has formed, with high tenant demand fuelling buy-to-let investment.

The portal also reveals that many letting agents are observing same-day rentals, with little or no properties available to let.

It describes rental demand as “extraordinary”1, noting lack of supply from housing associations and local authorities.

Director of Rightmove, Miles Shipside, says: “Tenant demand is such that many letting agents are reporting viewings and tenancy applications on the same day as marketing properties.

“In some cases they’ve nothing left to rent until tenants move out or a new influx of investor landlords gives some short-lived respite to tenants-in-waiting.

“Both investor landlords and first time buyers looking to buy smaller homes are finding them in short supply. As they’re typically owned by potential first time sellers, the price gap and costs of moving to the second step on the housing ladder deter them from coming to market.

“Competition is most fierce in this sector, with first time buyers and buy-to-let investors going head-to-head for the same properties.”1

The report follows data from Your Move and Reeds Rains, which shows that rents around the UK have reached an all-time high.

The average rent in London is now £1,301 per month, up 11.6% on last year.

Nationally, the average rent has risen by 6.3% from last year, hitting £816 a month.

1 http://www.propertyindustryeye.com/first-time-buyers-asked-to-pay-the-price-as-they-go-head-to-head-with-investors/