Posts with tag: letting agents

MPs call for greater powers to crackdown on illegal London lets

Published On: March 22, 2017 at 10:37 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

As more buy-to-let landlords in London are beginning to utilise short-term letting platforms such as Airbnb, MPs are calling for more powers in order to crackdown on rogues.

A growing number of landlords are using these platforms to breach rules on letting properties, which only permit homes to be rented out short-term for up to 90 days.

Crackdown

Talking to Parliament yesterday, Westminster North Labour MP Karen Buck, along with nine other MPs, argued that landlords should have to notify councils of the dates that their property is being used for short-letting.

Buck notes that Westminster council alone is investigating over 1,100 properties which are believed to have breached the 90-day limit.

She said she welcomed, ‘freedom for homeowners to let their properties,’ but insisted that, ‘without excessive bureaucratic interference,’ it is hard for, ‘cash strapped councils to police the rules.’[1]

‘Alongside the responsible owner-occupiers are irresponsible ones, illegal sub-letters and an increasingly significant commercial operation, seeking to take advantage of potentially higher yields,’ she continued.[1]

MPs call for greater powers to crackdown on illegal London lets

MPs call for greater powers to crackdown on illegal London lets

Blocks

Earlier in March, the Mayor of London called on short-term agents operating in London to block hosts from renting out homes in the capital for over 90 days. These include Veeve, One Fine Stay, Wimdu, Booking.com, HomeAway and Airsorted.

However, until there is a change in the existing rules to analyze activity levels, Field thinks that a, ‘free-for all in short-term lets’ will keep, ‘causing misery for thousands of our constituents.’[1]

‘We want the local council to have effective powers to clamp down on this,’ she concluded.[1]

[1] https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2017/3/mps-call-for-greater-powers-to-clamp-down-on-illegal-lets-in-london

Landlords will Still use Letting Agents in Wake of Fee Ban, Shows Study

Published On: March 21, 2017 at 9:23 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,,

The majority of landlords (71%) that use letting agents to manage their properties will continue to do so in the wake of the proposed tenant fee ban, according to a new study.

The research, by UKALA (the UK Association of Letting Agents), shows that eight in ten landlords (79%) think their letting agents will increase their fees as a result of the ban on charging tenants fees, as announced in the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement last year.

However, just 9% of landlords say they will part ways with their agent if their premiums rise.

Landlords will Still use Letting Agents in Wake of Fee Ban, Shows Study

Landlords will Still use Letting Agents in Wake of Fee Ban, Shows Study

The fee ban has been criticised by UKALA, which argues that affordability in the private rental sector cannot be addressed by preventing agents from charging for legitimate business services, and that the costs will eventually be passed onto tenants in the long-term.

In response to a potential increase in agent fees following the ban, the landlords surveyed said:

  • 40% would increase rents to cover the costs.
  • 22% would look to shop around for a better deal.
  • 13% would attempt to negotiate or refuse to pay.
  • 9% would pay the additional fees.
  • 9% would leave their agent.
  • 7% were unsure.

The findings contrast with other research from UKALA, which shows that almost half of landlords (47%) would forego the services of their letting agent if their profits drop following the forthcoming changes to landlord taxes.

Both studies were undertaken by UKALA in conjunction with the National Landlords Association (NLA), in order to better understand the impact that recent Government policy decisions will have on the professional lettings sector.

The Executive Director of UKALA, Richard Price, says: “UKALA agents strive to provide a premium service which represents excellent value for money, but the ban on tenant fees could leave hundreds of professional businesses with no other option than to increase fees for their landlord clients.

“This research is reassuring for agents in some ways, as it shows the majority of landlords will retain their services even if they have to pay more, which is testament to the essential role that agents play.”

He adds: “However, one in ten landlords say they will turn their back on their agents if fees are passed on, and our previous research shows that a significant number will do the same if the impending tax changes take hold and erode their profits.

“It leaves a tricky path ahead to navigate for agents, as they’ll need to balance out the need to cover their costs in the wake of a ban on tenant fees, without alienating their primary customers and source of income.”

Landlords, would you be discouraged from using your letting agent if the fee ban is introduced?

NALS calls for Budget to end confusion in the PRS

Published On: March 8, 2017 at 11:18 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,

With the industry bracing itself for today’s Budget, the National Approved Letting Scheme (NALS) has called for the Government to ‘end the confusion and uncertainty’ in the market.

The organisation has forwarded multiple suggestions that it believes will assist the Government to provide a Private Rental Sector that works for everyone.

Fees

The NALS feels that all services provided to tenants should be paid for by them and not the landlord. It feels that the proposed ban of on letting agents fees charged to tenants will only lead to a series of ‘inevitable consequences’ for consumers.

This include:

  • reduction in services
  • more self-managing landlords which will lower standards
  • rogue agents charging fees
  • increased closures of smaller letting agencies

As such, NALS has reaffirmed its call for a Competition and Markets Authority review into lettings fees. It also feels that all agents should be regulated.

NALS calls for Budget to end confusion in the PRS

NALS calls for Budget to end confusion in the PRS

Funding

What’s more, the NALS has urged the Government to provide more money to local authorities in order to fund more effective reinforcement and policing of the private rental sector.

A NALS statement said: ‘Increased legislation is meaningless if there are not sufficient means to check it is operating correctly.’[1]

‘Simply, we want to make the Private Rented Sector a better, fairer place for all. While the recent Government focus on the PRS and its importance is welcome, there has been no real action,’ said Isobel Thomson, chief executive of NALS.[1]

‘We believe there are some immediate key areas, which must be addressed if we are truly to help improve the sector. Industry is waiting, it’s time for Government to act now,’ she added.[1]

[1] https://www.lettingagenttoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2017/3/budget-2017-nals-wants-a-prs-for-all

Buy-to-Let Expert Paul Shamplina Back for Third Series of Nightmare Tenants, Slum Landlords

Buy-to-let expert Paul Shamplina, the Founder of Landlord Action and a brand ambassador of Hamilton Fraser, is back for a third series of Nightmare Tenants, Slum Landlords.

Buy-to-Let Expert Paul Shamplina Back for Third Series of Nightmare Tenants, Slum Landlords

Buy-to-Let Expert Paul Shamplina Back for Third Series of Nightmare Tenants, Slum Landlords

The 12-part series starts this Sunday (5th March) on Channel 5. Once again, the programme will delve into the dark side of the buy-to-let sector, showing the complexities that landlords and tenants face on a daily basis.

The first episode, which starts at 8pm, highlights one lady’s desperate fight to win back the home she grew up in from a woman she once considered a family friend.

Wendy Rose, from Bristol, was forced to call in buy-to-let expert Shamplina to help evict her nightmare tenant, who didn’t pay the rent and owed almost £3,000.

Shamplina confirms that Wendy’s story concerns a common landlord issue – rent arrears: “Wendy’s mother was seriously ill and needed to be moved into a nursing home. A friend asked if she could rent the house, which Wendy was delighted about, as the rental income would help cover her mother’s care costs and the place would be looked after. Things didn’t quite go as expected for Wendy unfortunately, and she needed help to get her family friend evicted from her home.

“Renting to a friend or indeed a family member can cause problems if the correct procedures aren’t followed, like with any other tenant. Regardless of the relationship, landlords need to understand the risks upfront as well as their legal obligations, and have clear, methodical referencing in place.”

Commenting on the new series, the buy-to-let expert says: “This series sees me travelling up and down the country uncovering the struggles landlords are faced with when dealing with nightmare tenants, and vice versa in some cases. We also experience rogue letting agents – I even get locked in one of their offices!

“I believe this show really highlights the fact that there should be a centralised database that lists rogue tenants, in order to help safeguard landlords. It’s all well and good that the Government are trying to improve the industry by having a database of rogue landlords and letting agents available to local councils, but what about protection for landlords from bad tenants? Surely there needs to be similar safety measures in place for them also?”

Could Manchester be the next city to ban ‘To Let’ boards?

Published On: February 28, 2017 at 1:44 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

Manchester Council is the latest council to consider a city-wide ban on letting agents ‘To Let’ boards.

The local authority argues that the sheer number of these boards in some locations, particularly those with high-numbers of students, create not only an eyesore but an opportunity for burglars. The boards, the Council says, gives an indication of when properties are vacant at certain points of the year.

In addition, the authority notes that many boards remain up on an almost-permanent basis, despite the law stating that they should be removed within 14 days of a new tenancy commencing.

Proposals

Councillors are due to set out proposals that will ask letting agents to remove signs, with the promise not to erect new ones. This arrangement is set to be voluntary at first, but could be subject to more formal regulation moving forwards.

In recent months, restrictions have been imposed on ‘To Let’ boards in York, Durham, Brighton and Hove, Belfast, Leicester, Liverpool, Nottingham and other regions.

Could Manchester be the next city to ban 'To Let' boards?

Could Manchester be the next city to ban ‘To Let’ boards?

A Manchester council spokesperson told the Manchester Evening News: ‘The high concentration of these signs in some areas of the city creates an unsightly blot on the landscape and can be a real eyesore for local residents.’[1]

‘In addition, the signs may help identify properties rented by students, seen by criminals as easy targets. Many of the signs remain in place all year round despite properties being tenanted and only serve as advertising for rental companies,’ they added.[1]

Chief Executive of ARLA David Cox, also told the paper: ‘It is important to remember that ‘To Let’ boards are still, even in an internet age, vital for advertising rental properties. The traditional way of finding a property through a ‘To Let’ sign is still very popular among tenants.’[1]

[1] https://www.lettingagenttoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2017/2/to-let-boards-may-be-banned-across-one-of-uks-largest-cities

 

Brace of rogue agents and landlords fined

Published On: February 23, 2017 at 2:35 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

A brace of cases involving rogue letting agents and landlords have led to hefty fines for those culpable.

Two unscrupulous landlords in Reading have been fined nearly £9,000 for poor housing standards and a disregard for the welfare of their tenants.

Hazards

Broken toilets and inaccessible fire escapes were amongst the hazards found by council officers when they visited the property in Oxford Road last summer.

More health and safety hazards identified in the rental property included:

  • faulty fire alarms
  • damaged plug sockets
  • dangerous windows

The managers of the property, Abdullah Yaqubi and Said Kamel Hashemi, both admitted 14 offences at Reading Magistrates Court and were told to pay £8,800 in fines.

Councillor Richard Davies, Reading’s lead member for housing, noted: ‘HMOs are an important part of the housing market in Reading but they are subject to certain regulations for the safety and comfort of tenants.’[1]

‘Most landlords abide by these rules but those who do not and fail to respond to contact by the Council’s officers can expect to face the consequences. This is a good result for Reading’s Private Sector Housing and Legal teams and I hope it makes other property managers and landlords who are tempted to flout the rules sit up and take note,’ he added.[1]

Brace of rogue agents and landlords fined

Brace of rogue agents and landlords fined

Debts

Meanwhile, a convicted letting agent in Surrey who used his client’s cash to cover his business debts has been told to pay £25,000 in compensation to his victims.

Mr Chandra Patel, who was sentenced to 10 months imprisonment in April 2016, took rent and deposit payments which were held in a trust, while operating as Giraffe Properties Limited. Patel took £28,000 from this fund.

Over a dozen landlords were owed money by Mr Patel when the firm ceased trading. Some landlords were left to reimburse their tenants using their own funds.

An application made under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 for Confiscation and Compensation, saw Mr Patel appear before Kingston Crown Court earlier this month. Here, he was determined to compensate his victims and was told to do so within three months.

A council spokesperson said: ‘We have begun the process of contacting the landlords affected by Mr Patel’s illegal activities so that they can duly compensated.’[1]

[1] https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2017/2/rogue-landlords-handed-a-hefty-fine