Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

House Prices Continue Steady Rise in February, Reports Nationwide

Published On: March 1, 2017 at 10:03 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

House prices rose steadily in February, up from average annual growth of 4.3% in January to 4.5%, according to the latest House Price Index from Nationwide.

House Prices Continue Steady Rise in February, Reports Nationwide

House Prices Continue Steady Rise in February, Reports Nationwide

On a monthly basis, the average house price increased by 0.6% in February, up from just 0.2% in the previous month.

This growth takes the average house price in the UK to £205,846, up from £205,240 in January 2017.

The Nationwide data also shows that more households in England now own their homes outright than with a mortgage.

Robert Gardner, the Chief Economist at Nationwide, comments on the figures: “Recent data suggests that the UK economy has continued to perform relatively strongly. The economy accelerated slightly in Q4, expanding by a healthy 0.7% quarter-on-quarter, and the unemployment rate remained stable at an 11-year low of 4.8%.

“The outlook is uncertain, but we, along with most other forecasters, expect the UK economy to slow through 2017 as heightened uncertainty weighs on business investment and hiring. Consumer spending, a key engine of growth in recent quarters, is also likely to be impacted by rising inflation in the months ahead as a result of the weaker pound.”

However, he adds: “Nevertheless, in our view, a small rise in house prices of around 2% is more likely than a decline over the course of 2017, since low borrowing costs and the dearth of homes on the market will continue to support prices.”

The Founder and CEO of online estate agent eMoov.co.uk, Russell Quirk, also says: “The UK market has come out of the blocks slow but steady for 2017, and has continued to see upward price growth, shaking off January’s lowest rate of increase in 14 months. This was almost certainly seasonal and, as spring approaches, UK buyers seem to be emerging from hibernation, albeit tentatively.

“Despite the doom and gloom predictions, we should start to see an increase in market activity over the coming months, which should further strengthen this upward price trend.”

He continues: “It will be interesting to see where we stand after this month’s Budget announcement. With an overall air of hesitation in the market, it is likely that many savvy buyers will be holding out to see what the Chancellor has in store, whereas the previous bulletproof nature of the market may have seen them proceed with a purchase regardless.

“It is likely that Mr. Hammond will loosen his stranglehold on the top end market where Stamp Duty is concerned, which could breathe new life into the market to an extent, particularly in London. The severity of the property market storm in 2017 could well hinge on next week’s announcements, so it will be interesting to see where we stand this time next month.”

Where are UK renters most satisfied?

Published On: March 1, 2017 at 9:59 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

A new survey has revealed whereabouts in the UK renters are most and least satisfied.

According to data from the report carried out by Intus Lettings, the North East of England is the best region for tenants. Here, 52% of the 2,000 tenants questioned said that they were happy with their landlord.

Capital Pains

On the other hand, Londoners were found to be least satisfied, with only 20% saying that they were satisfied.

The main tenant irritations were found to be the level of customer service given by landlords, time taken to respond to maintenance issues, availability, inspections and fees.

Some specific issues highlighted included a ‘lack of communication and ‘lack of competence’ when dealing with repairs.

Hope McKendrick, letting manager at Intus Lettings, said: ‘We’re always hearing about the best and happiest places to live in Britain in terms of wellbeing, job satisfaction and availability of good schools, but there’s little research about how happy our renters are and which are getting the best service from UK landlords.’[1]

Where are UK renters most satisfied?

Where are UK renters most satisfied?

‘The survey results give us a different perspective on where is the best and it appears that our Geordie neighbours are winning in this case!’ she continued.[1]

Concluding, McKendrick noted: ‘High fees and costs will clearly contribute to the dissatisfaction of renters in the capital. However, as the property market in London becomes more and more demanding and saturated, landlords may be overstretched and even less able to respond to tenant needs as well as other regions, adding to their frustrations.’[1]

 

[1] https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2017/2/every-landlord-wants-a-happy-tenant-as-it-makes-it-more-likely-that-they-will-live-in-the-property-longer-pay-their-rent-on-time-and-keep-the-property-in-good-condition–but-where-in-the-country-are-the-most-satisfied-tenants-found-according-to

Only a Minority of Tenants want Longer-Term Tenancies, Claims ARLA

Published On: March 1, 2017 at 9:39 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Only a minority of tenants want longer-term tenancies, claims the Managing Director of ARLA Propertymark, David Cox.

Only a Minority of Tenants want Longer-Term Tenancies, Claims ARLA

Only a Minority of Tenants want Longer-Term Tenancies, Claims ARLA

Speaking at the Paragon Great Buy-to-Let Debate, Cox insisted that the minority of tenants shouldn’t harm the majority that are seeking short-term contracts.

Panellists at the event discussed the recent Housing White Paper from the Government, which included proposals for longer-term tenancies.

Cox said: “If tenants wanted longer-term tenancies, the market would have reacted to it. Tenants don’t ask for three to five-year tenancies, they ask for six to 12-month ones.

“There is probably a tiny percentage that want longer-term. Should the majority be penalised by the minority?”

However, he did back the longer-term tenancies being introduced as a condition of Build to Rent funding, as outlined in the Housing White Paper.

He also addressed the issue of the impending letting agent fee ban for tenants, comparing the fees to what a buyer would pay when applying for a mortgage or getting a property survey.

He added: “If the Government wanted to make renting cheaper, tenant fees are the tiniest slice of it. This is just a populist policy that won’t assist anybody.”

Audience members echoed Cox’s views, with one shouting out that the Government had decided on its policy on banning lettings fee despite not even consulting on it yet.

As a landlord, have you noticed that tenants don’t want longer-term tenancies, or are you receiving requests for terms between three to five years?

In addition, do you agree that the Government should consult on the lettings fee ban before implementing the measure? And how do you think this will affect your lettings business and ability to carry extra costs if charges are passed onto you instead of your tenants?

We will continue to keep you up to date with changes to landlord law and lettings policy.

Could Manchester be the next city to ban ‘To Let’ boards?

Published On: February 28, 2017 at 1:44 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

Manchester Council is the latest council to consider a city-wide ban on letting agents ‘To Let’ boards.

The local authority argues that the sheer number of these boards in some locations, particularly those with high-numbers of students, create not only an eyesore but an opportunity for burglars. The boards, the Council says, gives an indication of when properties are vacant at certain points of the year.

In addition, the authority notes that many boards remain up on an almost-permanent basis, despite the law stating that they should be removed within 14 days of a new tenancy commencing.

Proposals

Councillors are due to set out proposals that will ask letting agents to remove signs, with the promise not to erect new ones. This arrangement is set to be voluntary at first, but could be subject to more formal regulation moving forwards.

In recent months, restrictions have been imposed on ‘To Let’ boards in York, Durham, Brighton and Hove, Belfast, Leicester, Liverpool, Nottingham and other regions.

Could Manchester be the next city to ban 'To Let' boards?

Could Manchester be the next city to ban ‘To Let’ boards?

A Manchester council spokesperson told the Manchester Evening News: ‘The high concentration of these signs in some areas of the city creates an unsightly blot on the landscape and can be a real eyesore for local residents.’[1]

‘In addition, the signs may help identify properties rented by students, seen by criminals as easy targets. Many of the signs remain in place all year round despite properties being tenanted and only serve as advertising for rental companies,’ they added.[1]

Chief Executive of ARLA David Cox, also told the paper: ‘It is important to remember that ‘To Let’ boards are still, even in an internet age, vital for advertising rental properties. The traditional way of finding a property through a ‘To Let’ sign is still very popular among tenants.’[1]

[1] https://www.lettingagenttoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2017/2/to-let-boards-may-be-banned-across-one-of-uks-largest-cities

 

The Buy for Uni Mortgages Turning Students into Landlords

Published On: February 28, 2017 at 11:21 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,,

The last thing students graduating from university expect to have in this day and age is a mortgage – the student loan debt they have and difficulty in raising a deposit mean that most will have to wait years before they can get onto the property ladder. Unless, of course, they are homeowners already.

That’s where the new Buy for Uni mortgages come in. Lenders are now looking to students as customers for early mortgages, which effectively turn them into landlords.

The new Buy for Uni mortgage from the Loughborough Building Society promises up to 100% financing for a property purchase, as long as close relatives provide security. A similar product has been on offer through Bath Building Society for some years, although both have been met with caution from student representatives.

Under Loughborough Building Society’s deal, students who are over 18 and in higher education in England and Wales can acquire a loan for up to £300,000, as long as the property is within ten miles of where they study.

Supporting them must be members of their immediate family – parents, step-parents or grandparents – who can provide security in cash or equity in a property, such as the family home, if the loan is for more than 80% of the property’s value. Interest rates range from 4.54%-4.74%, depending on what security is provided and the term of the mortgage.

Gary Brebner, the Chief Executive of the building society, believes the mortgage is a gateway product to get on the property ladder. After the three or five-year term, when the student will have graduated, it is expected that the loan will change into a more traditional mortgage.

As it’s unlikely that a student’s income will cover the repayments, the student instead becomes a landlord, earning money from the spare rooms by renting them out.

Brebner explains: “What you want is that the rental income covers more than the commitment, so if there is a rise in interest rates, it will cover it. Or that the guarantor says: ‘Well, yes, if interest rates did go up, or there was a void in rent, I the guarantor will pay that rent instead.’”

He adds that there has been substantial interest in the offer, but no money has yet been lent.

In Bath, however, the model has been in operation for nine years. Bath Building Society reports that the loans now account for around 10% of it mortgage business.

Again, a guarantee is needed from parents to bring the loan-to-value (LTV) ratio down to 75%. This means that if a student wants to take out a 100% mortgage to buy a £200,000 property, the parent must provide a £50,000 charge.

Chief Executive Dick Jenkins says that, in most circumstances, the rental income goes “a long way towards” covering the repayments, working better in some towns than others.

“We do come across the occasional person who thinks that we are offering them an enormous amount of beer money, but we obviously disabuse them of that notion quickly,” he says. “Most people are pretty serious and switched on and tend to come from reasonably well-off families, because we do need to take a collateral charge over mum and dad’s property to make that product work, so there has to be some equity in the parents’ property.”

However, he admits: “In some senses, that defines you as approaching more middle-class households than working-class, but that does not mean it is not a valid product for a given segment of the population.”

Student representatives have moved to ensure that undergraduates are aware of what they are getting themselves into when signing up for the mortgages at a potentially very young age.

The Buy for Uni Mortgages Turning Students into Landlords

The Buy for Uni Mortgages Turning Students into Landlords

The Vice President for Welfare at the National Union of Students, Shelly Asquith, insists: “Students should be careful of offers that seem too good to be true. Buying a house will usually involve significant hidden costs for deposits, agents and surveyors, even if the monthly payments seem to compare well with rented properties.”

Jenkins acknowledges that the Buy for Uni mortgage is not for everyone and recognises the criticism: “This is not a product that is available to all, because not everybody has got the parental equity to put into the equation. But that is no reason not to help those who have. We do get a little bit of flak about whether it is an elitist product. I don’t think it is.

“But certainly it works best for students who are probably on long courses, who can get the best benefit out of it over a longer period.”

However, while students may not be famous for their devotion to personal finance, Jenkins says that default rates on loans are much lower than on standard mortgages.

“We have found that the student-parental bond – that understanding that the parents and students have – means that if there is a payment problem, we tend not to see it because it gets resolved before it gets to us,” he explains. “They sort it out between themselves. I can honestly say that, in nine years, we have never had a problem case.”

But are the Buy for Uni mortgages saddling students with heavy debt at too young an age?

Brebner further maintains that they are not for everyone: “When we meet someone, we want to be sure that they know what they are doing. It might be that their circumstances are not quite right. It might be their guarantor circumstances are not quite right.

“There are going to be a number of things which we will explore as part of this to make sure that anyone who takes this as an alternative to renting, or as an alternative to student accommodation, understands what they are getting into.”

He adds: “We are not encouraging people to take on debt that they don’t understand or they wouldn’t understand their responsibilities towards. We are quite a cautious lender.”

Two mortgage experts, however, have given their views on the Buy for Uni loans:

David Hollingworth, of London & Country Mortgages, says that, as the loans are niche products, the interest rates are higher than would normally be expected: “The rates are higher than would typically be available to a first time buyer, even where parental security is being used, such as the Barclays Family Springboard deal that offers a three-year fixed rate of 2.99% up to 100% LTV with no fee where 10% parental cash is locked down as additional security.

“Both lenders offer the product on variable rates, so there is less stability on offer, but, nonetheless, these deals could offer a very practical and smart solution to the right person.”

Alistair Hargreaves, the Executive Mortgage Protection Consultant at broker John Charcol, isn’t convinced that rental income will cover the stress tests: “If somebody doesn’t have any capital to go down on this and they have to put a charge against their property and someone is going to be at university for three or four years, I can see it making sense. I just think rents are not going to be enough to sustain it, so mum and dad are going to have to have a decent income to back it up.”

One benefit, however, is that the property will be in the child’s name, points out Hollingworth: “That avoids any potential Stamp Duty Land Tax surcharge on the purchase of additional property, assuming that the parent already owns their own home.”

Regardless, parents need to understand the impact of providing security, he emphasises: “If everything went horribly wrong – the property was repossessed and sold for less than the outstanding debt – the lender could claim the shortfall from the parental cash or equity.

“In addition, where the parent is using their property as the additional collateral, it could have an impact on any future borrowing against their own home. Where using cash as security, the funds will remain in the parental names, but will not be accessible while they remain as security.”

What do you think of the new Buy for Uni mortgages – are they a good idea?

More calls for brokers to advise clients on BTL tax changes

Published On: February 28, 2017 at 10:44 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,,

First Complete and Pink are calling on brokers to make sure that any landlords that they have on their books are talking with a qualified accountant, to ensure they are up to speed with the implications of upcoming tax changes.

From April 2017, the Government will start to phase out the higher rate of tax relief over a period of four years. This means that buy-to-let investors will no longer be able to claim 45% tax relief on their monthly interest payments. Instead, they will only be able to have the basic rate of 20%.

Add to this harsher underwriting standards for landlords and it looks like another tough few months for the buy-to-let market.

Workshops

First Complete and Pink recently hosted seven buy-to-let workshops, which gave brokers the chance to speak with experts on how the changes will impact on them and their clients.

Brokers were given an overview of the new tax regime and talked about HMOs and limited companies.

More calls for brokers to advise clients on BTL tax changes

More calls for brokers to advise clients on BTL tax changes

Toni Smith, sales operations director for First Complete and Pink, noted: ‘The specialist buy-to-let workshops are one of many events that First Complete and Pink runs to support its advisors. Events like these demonstrate our commitment to continually offering a market leading network proposition to brokers in an evolving marketplace.’[1]

‘Brokers have a vital role to play in flagging the impact of the tax changes to clients, and to point them in the right direction of a qualified accountant. It is equally important that brokers avoid giving further detailed commentary or debate around the topic of tax treatment of BTL portfolios – as this could be constructed as advice and relied on by the client,’ he added.[1]

Concluding, he said: ‘There are challenging times ahead for landlords and they will need all the help and support they can get. Mortgage brokers – as ever –  will be a key point of contact as new complexities continue to emerge for landlords.’[1]

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/landlords/calls-for-brokers-to-upd4te-landlords-and-clients-on-btl-changes.html