Posts with tag: tenants

More than a Quarter of Letting Agents Seeing Rents Rise

Published On: July 3, 2017 at 9:07 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

More than a Quarter of Letting Agents Seeing Rents Rise

More than a Quarter of Letting Agents Seeing Rents Rise

Over a quarter of letting agents saw rents rise in May – the highest level since last July, according to ARLA Propertymark (the Association of Residential Letting Agents).

The organisation’s May Private Rented Sector Report found that 27% of letting agents saw rents rise for tenants in May, which is the highest level recorded since July 2016, when 28% experienced growth in rents.

For the second consecutive month, just 2.8% of tenants successfully negotiated a rent reduction. This figure had increased to 3.6% in March, but it appears that their bargaining power is now decreasing.

Meanwhile, the supply of rental stock increased to an average of 189 per member branch in May – up by 11% on last year, when this figure stood at 171.

The increase in rental stock is owed in part to the drop in the number of landlords selling up in May, with agents reporting three sales per branch, down from four in April.

The Chief Executive of ARLA Propertymark, David Cox, comments on the latest report: “Private rents rose by 1.8% in the 12 months to May 2017, and the last thing tenants need is for them to get even higher.

“With the new Government confirming a Tenants’ Fee Bill in the Queen’s Speech, we can expect them to rise by up to £103 a year, hitting loyal tenants looking for long-term agreements hardest. This is on top of any natural organic rent growth as well.”

He adds: “The only thing which could offset this would be to significantly increase rental stock, but, until this happens and supply and demand meet in the middle, rents will only become more and more unaffordable.”

A cap of one month’s rent on tenants’ security deposits was also announced in last month’s Queen’s Speech, which followed the controversial General Election result.

Homebuyers Need to Save for 10 Years to Afford a Deposit in 34 Local Authorities

Published On: June 30, 2017 at 9:25 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

Prospective homebuyers will need to save for ten years to be able to afford a deposit for their own home in 34 local authorities across the UK, according to a study by MoneySuperMarket.

The price comparison website analysed average house prices and typical salaries, in combination with data from its mortgage affordability calculator, to work out the average deposit needed to buy a house in the UK’s 441 local authorities.

In 20% of local authority areas, the average minimum deposit is greater than £50,000.

In Camden, the average deposit figure is 56.5% of the property’s value, which equates to homebuyers saving for 27 years – the longest of any area in the UK.

Unsurprisingly, London dominates 16 of the top 20 UK boroughs with the highest average deposit requirements.

While many prospective homebuyers will want to buy a house in the area that they currently live, many will find that affording a home in their own area could well be an impossible dream.

Using Land Registry and Office for National Statistics (ONS) house price data, MoneySuperMarket worked out the average minimum deposit for all local authorities across the UK. This is the minimum deposit that an average salaried couple would need to put down to buy a typical home in their own area. The size of the deposit is determined by how much the couple could borrow on a mortgage, given what they earn.

The results show just how difficult it can be to buy locally, with deposits reaching as much as £688,772 in Kensington and Chelsea and £490,737 in Camden.

The graphic below highlights the highest average minimum deposit in every region, along with the top 50 across the UK.

Landlords can use these figures to determine where they should be investing in private rental homes; areas with high deposit requirements will mean that many prospective buyers are priced out of purchasing a home, so will be forced to rent instead. You will likely find high tenant demand in these locations.

If you do decide to invest, remember to target the right tenants and provide safe, secure and comfortable homes to those renting from you.

Homebuyers Need to Save for 10 Years to Afford a Deposit in 34 Local Authorities

Homebuyers Need to Save for 10 Years to Afford a Deposit in 34 Local Authorities

 

London’s Greenest Boroughs for Properties Costing Under £500,000

Published On: June 30, 2017 at 8:13 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,,

Although it may appear that summer has come and gone already, sun seekers will always be looking to catch the rays whenever possible. For that reason, gardens and public green space are essential to some house hunters. Landlords looking to target this market should check out London’s greenest boroughs for properties costing less than £500,000…

In a major city like London, properties near outdoor space, not to mention with a private garden, can come at a premium price. But having these on offer can really make your property stand out in a competitive market.

That’s why online estate agent eMoov.co.uk has found London’s greenest boroughs where the average house price is under £500,000.

Using data on the land use of each London borough, eMoov looked at the locations across the capital that are cheapest for investors, but boast gardens and outdoor space.

The London Datastore provides data on the land use of every borough. This includes the percentage of the borough covered by domestic buildings, domestic gardens, non-domestic buildings, roads, railways, pathways, green space, water, and other areas of land use or unclassified land. For this research, the figures for domestic gardens and green space were used.

eMoov used the latest Land Registry house price figures for average property values in each borough.

Gardens

London's Greenest Boroughs for Properties Costing Under £500,000

London’s Greenest Boroughs for Properties Costing Under £500,000

A private garden in London is a very sought-after feature, especially if you’re marketing your property during summer.

Topping the list with the highest percentage of land use allocated to domestic gardens is Harrow, with 34.7%. The northwest London borough not only has the largest percentage of boroughs with homes costing less than £500,000, but also the highest across the whole of the capital. Although this abundance of garden space comes at the upper end of the £500,000 bracket, at £473,019, it still offers a typical house price below the London average.

Sutton, where garden space stands at 34.5%, closely follows Harrow. This is the second highest of the capital as a whole, but with a more appealing average house price of £371,383.

Staying in southwest London, the borough of Croydon has 32.8% of land use allocated to domestic gardens – the third highest in the capital – with an average property value of £367,160.

Green space

Unfortunately, not every London home comes with a garden, so being near outdoor public spaces is the next best option for many Londoners wanting to get out of the house and escape the city life.

When it comes to the largest percentage of land use where green space is concerned, Havering takes the lead, with 59.4% and an affordable average house price of £362,983.

Heading south of the river, Bromley offers 57.8% of green space, but the average property value jumps to £433,008. Both Havering and Bromley are also the boroughs with the largest areas of public outdoor land use across the whole of London.

Although Richmond upon Thames has the third largest amount of green space in the capital, at 50.8%, its average house price of £675,435 means it doesn’t quite make the cut.

Instead, it’s west London’s Hillingdon, with the fourth largest percentage of green space, at 49.2%, and with a more affordable average house price of £415,716.

Overall

The list remains similar when it comes to combining both the amount of domestic garden area and green space in a borough, with Bromley and Havering swapping places, at 81.1% and 78.8% respectively.

Again, Richmond is home to the third largest percentage of both garden and outdoor space, but Croydon takes third place, with 69.9% of combined land use and an average property value of just £367,160.

Alternatively, if price is the deciding factor for you, the capital’s two most affordable boroughs are still an attractive proposition for outdoor living.

Both Bexley and Barking and Dagenham have an average house price below £335,000, and both sit mid-table for overall green space, at 56.8% and 56.3% respectively.

The average property in Barking and Dagenham goes for £277,508, with 22.8% garden area and 33.6% green space, while Bexley’s average house price is £334,053, with 25.1% of the borough covered by domestic gardens and 31.7% by green space.

The Founder and CEO of eMoov, Russell Quirk, comments: “Having accessibility to outdoor areas in your community can be equally as important as other amenities, such as good schools, transport links and supermarkets. Often these amenities will come at a cost, particularly in central London, which is helping drive the trend of London homebuyers moving further outward to be able to have more space, outdoor living and the important conveniences that make for a better quality of life.

“It is often those second and third rung buyers who will place a larger importance on a garden or nearby outdoor space, as they invest in a home for a growing family or to support a particular lifestyle. This research shows that although green space can be costly, there are many boroughs where it comes in abundance, without having to pay above the odds.”

Landlords, head to London’s greenest boroughs to offer your tenants plenty of green space at an affordable price for you.

Landlords Should Beware of No Deposit Insurance, Warns White Paper

Published On: June 29, 2017 at 9:18 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,,

Landlords should beware of no deposit insurance, warns a new white paper from mydeposits, as tenancy deposit schemes celebrate ten years since their introduction across England and Wales.

Tenancy deposit schemes provide landlords with greater protection during the lettings process, should the tenant breach the terms of the tenancy agreement, such as causing damage or not paying the rent, as they allow landlords to make appropriate deductions from the deposit.

Landlords Should Beware of No Deposit Insurance, Warns White Paper

Landlords Should Beware of No Deposit Insurance, Warns White Paper

It is also a legal requirement for landlords to protect any deposits they take from a tenant in one of the three Government-approved schemes.

However, tenancy deposits have come under fire recently, with the Government announcing plans to cap security deposits at one month’s rent.

Some landlords are now seeking alternative no deposit insurance, which offers a deposit-free solution, in order to protect themselves and their tenants.

But Eddie Hooker, the CEO of Hamilton Fraser, which is the parent company of mydeposits, is not entirely convinced by some of the products on offer.

His firm has compiled a 14-page white paper that reviews how these no deposit insurance products operate versus traditional cash tenancy deposits.

Read the full white paper here: https://www.mydeposits.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Deposit-or-no-deposit-insurance-What-we-need-to-know-1.pdf

Hooker says: “There are now several no deposit insurance products that offer a solution whereby a tenant can rent a property without having to put down a deposit. Despite the initial attraction, I have been unable to find clear answers to some pertinent questions. Landlords and tenants entering into such contracts should do so with their eyes wide open.”

More than four million individual deposits are now protected by tenancy deposit protection schemes, and dispute levels have dropped to less than 2% of all tenancies.

“The no deposit products use the 2% dispute levels as proof that they can keep their claims and premiums low, but they are misusing the statistics,” Hooker explains. “In fact, more than 40% of deposits are returned to the tenant with an agreed deduction. That means at least 40% of landlords will have to make a claim on their insurance to cover costs.”

He says that he can see the merits of an alternative to deposits, but points out that processing claims costs money and these costs get added to the overall premium.

Hooker concludes: “Like most insurance products, the no deposit options reserve the right to subrogate their losses from the party responsible, so does that mean the tenant will be pursued for a claim that they may or may not be responsible for? Will tenants start to receive red letters, black lists and court judgments for missing payments?”

Let us know what you think of alternative no deposit insurance.

Government Plans will Outlaw Tenants with Pets, Believe Landlords

Published On: June 27, 2017 at 9:48 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,,

The recently confirmed Government plans to ban letting agent fees charged to tenants – announced in the Queen’s Speech – and a cap of one month’s rent on deposits will outlaw tenants with pets, among other vulnerable renters, believe landlords.

Government Plans will Outlaw Tenants with Pets, Believe Landlords

Government Plans will Outlaw Tenants with Pets, Believe Landlords

The Tenants’ Fees Bill will implement the policy to ban landlords and letting agents from taking any payments from tenants, with the exception of rent, a security deposit, a holding deposit and tenant default fees.

In the initial consultation on the fees ban, where the Government announced its intentions to look at putting a cap on security deposits, the National Landlords Association (NLA) attempted to argue that it was unnecessary.

Although it is not the intention of the tenancy deposit cap, the Government’s plans will inevitably reduce landlords’ willingness to accept tenants with pets, by removing their flexibility to take a higher deposit to cover any damage caused by the pets.

Previous research from the NLA shows:

  • 47% of landlords were unwilling to allow tenants with pets
  • 41% of those cited the reason as potential property damage
  • The average deposit taken by a landlord was 4.92 weeks’ rent

Furthermore, The Dogs Trust’s Lets with Pets scheme advises landlords to either take a higher deposit from tenants or include a “professional cleaning on move-out” clause in the tenancy agreement, to mitigate the financial risk of property damage.

Not only do the Government plans discourage tenants with pets, but they would also affect tenants with bad affordability status, bad credit, those without a guarantor, families with children and those in receipt of benefits – often the highest risk tenants who are usually required to pay higher deposits.

Veteran landlord and spokesperson for the Midland Landlord Accreditation Scheme (MLAS), Mary Latham, comments on the plans: “I have accepted tenants with pets for years, because a home is not a home without a pet. I have never had to withhold monies from deposits because of issues caused by those pets, and my tenants stay longer because they feel more at home.

“I am so angry that this will force many landlords to rethink the risk and prevent pet owners from renting nice homes. Government are so out of touch with the reality of the lives of those who they are meant to represent.”

Will the Government plans discourage you from letting to tenants with pets?

More younger tenants likely to vote in future Elections

Published On: June 26, 2017 at 1:22 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

Following criticism of young voters supposedly not turning out to pledge a vote during the 2016 EU Referendum, new analysis suggests that more youngsters voted during the recent General Election.

Analysis from tenant referencing firm Rent4sure suggests that the size of the 18-24 age group currently not on the electoral roll has dropped by half during the last four years. In percentage terms, this was a drop from 4.9% to 2.5% -with this figure still falling.

Electorate

The analysis from Rent4sure looks at UK national referenced to rent property and shows that 98% of those in this category are now on the electoral roll. This was a rise of 2% from 2013.

Of this 98%, nearly one quarter are aged between 18-24, with over half aged between 25-39. Almost one fifth are aged between 40-64, with just 1.4% aged 65% or over.

More younger tenants likely to vote in future Elections

More younger tenants likely to vote in future Elections

Luke Burton, director at Rent4sure, observed: ‘New housing minister Alok Sharma would be wise to sit up and take note of the growing influence of the ‘renting youth.’[1]

‘Generation Rent is growing with an anticipated 24 per cent of households predicted to be living in private rental accommodation by 2021, according to recent research by Knight Frank. What’s more the under 40’s make up the largest proportion of private renters,’ he continued.[1]

Concluding, Mr Burton said: ‘The rental generation is looking for appropriate housing and this demand is growing. Mr Sharma has a challenge ahead to ensure appropriate housing is available to meet demand, with investment in Build To Rent being a large factor.’[1]

[1] https://www.lettingagenttoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2017/6/younger-private-tenants-increasingly-likely-to-register-to-vote