Posts with tag: council homes

May Pledges Additional £2bn for Affordable Housing

Published On: October 5, 2017 at 9:04 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

Theresa May has pledged an additional £2 billion to build affordable housing, in a bid to “get Government back in the business of building houses”.

Speaking at the Conservative Party Conference yesterday, the Prime Minister said that councils and housing associations will be able to bid for the funds, and some homes will be built for social rent below market levels.

She said that the budget for affordable housing is now almost £9 billion, which will help to build a new generation of council houses.

May vowed to take “personal charge” of the issue, and called for housebuilders to do their bit by building on land made available, adding: “It won’t be quick or easy, but I will make it my mission to solve this problem and will take personal charge of the response by reigniting homeownership in Britain once again.”

Commenting on the announcement, the Parliamentary Affairs Manager at the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), Lewis Johnston, says: “It is over 65 years since a Conservative conference committed the party to delivering 300,000 homes a year. With today’s housing challenge no less urgent, the Prime Minister’s plan to unleash the first major Government housebuilding programme in decades indicates the kind of ambition we need to tackle the housing crisis.

May Pledges Additional £2bn for Affordable Housing

May Pledges Additional £2bn for Affordable Housing

“In 1968, councils accounted for 40% of all housebuilding and today’s plan is an acknowledgement that councils are an important part of the solution to the supply crisis, although it will be interesting to see how this announcement works with the recent expansion of Right to Buy.”

He adds: “The success of the plan depends on the Government’s willingness to tackle the other obstacles to building. Alongside the already announced measures, we need bold reforms of the planning system and a deep-seated resolve to unlock the potential of modern methods of construction.”

The CEO of the National Landlords Association (NLA), Richard Lambert, also comments: “The majority of landlords would agree that more social housing should be built, and it’s about time that the Prime Minister set aside a significant pot of money to do so.

“Government, society and indeed taxpayers will get better long-term value from investing in building than in subsidising rents.”

He continues: “Today’s announcement should not only provide more available housing for those most in need at rents they can afford, it should also relieve the pressure on the private sector, and choke off the breeding-ground for the minority of rogues and criminals who get away with providing substandard housing and neglecting their tenants”.

Meanwhile, Dan Wilson Craw, the Director of tenant lobby group Generation Rent, has also responded: “Under Theresa May, the Conservatives have made a welcome shift towards more state support for affordable housing and private renters, including today’s pledge on social rents. But this trickle of incremental announcements does little to address the urgent need that renters have for lower rents and stronger protections.

“Compared with the £10 billion being ploughed into the wasteful Help to Buy scheme, only £2 billion for social housing suggests the Government is still focusing too much on the symptoms of the housing crisis rather than its causes.

“Investment in social housing would mean permanent homes for the 75,000 families in temporary accommodation and lower market rents, whereas Help to Buy will get a small minority of renters into homeownership, while pushing up prices for the rest of us.”

Lindsay Judge, the Senior Policy Analyst at the Resolution Foundation, offers her thoughts: “The commitment of an extra £2 billion for affordable and social housing is a very welcome first step towards tackling Britain’s housing crisis. With over a million people on local waiting lists for social housing, it is a timely and necessary intervention.

“We are facing a huge social housing shortage. Back in 1981, three out of every ten families rented their home from the council or a housing association. Today, that figure has halved.

“But the size of the challenge is huge. During the Macmillan years, more than 100,000 council homes were built each year. Last year, there were just 1,840 new council homes built by local authorities, with housing associations adding another 25,000 affordable homes. Today’s announcement could mean a further 5,000 homes a year. That is welcome, but it’s equally clear more action will be needed.”

She concludes: “If Theresa May wants to lead the way on facing up to our housing challenge, she will need to ensure building happens on a scale we haven’t seen for a generation, with councils backed all the way to do so. And, in the meantime, families in the private rented sector should get the greater security they deserve.”

Trade Union Backs Labour in Election as House Price to Earnings Ratio Hits 8.2

Published On: June 6, 2017 at 9:13 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

Trade union GMB has backed Labour in Thursday’s (8th June) General Election, following its pledges to build more council homes, after research showed that average house prices in England have hit 8.2 times typical earnings.

Trade Union Backs Labour in Election as House Price to Earnings Ratio Hits 8.2

Trade Union Backs Labour in Election as House Price to Earnings Ratio Hits 8.2

The analysis by the London division of the GMB, based on Land Registry house price figures and Office for National Statistics (ONS) earnings data, showed that in the East of England, the average house price in March 2017 was £277,127, which is a huge 9.2 times the average full-time earnings for the area, of £30,000.

The situation was worst in Three Rivers, where average house prices are 15.9 times typical wages, followed by 15.1 in Hertsmere, 13.6 in Cambridge, 13.4 in St Albans and 12.9 in Epping Forest.

Across England as a whole, house prices were 8.2 times average earnings.

Warren Kenny, the London region secretary of GMB, insists that these statistics show that voters should back Labour in the General Election, due to its pledges to build one-million homes in the next parliament – half of which would be council houses.

Kenny explains: “GMB London region analysis of average house prices to average earnings in the East of England shows that the aspirations of working people on average earnings and below to own their own homes is no longer achievable.

“The Labour Party election manifesto pledges to build one-million homes in the next parliament, with half of them council housing. These figures show that more council homes for rent in all council areas are absolutely essential.”

He urges: “GMB is calling on the electorate in the East of England to get behind their Labour Party candidates in the area to realise this manifesto commitment.

“We have been talking about this problem for far too long. There can be no excuses for not providing housing to people that they can afford to live in on average wages.”

If you’re still contemplating who to vote for, this analysis by eMoov shows which political party has been best for house price growth since 1970: /best-political-party-house-price-growth/

House Building Must Grow Fivefold to Meet Right to Buy Promise, Warns NAO

House building to replace homes sold through the Right to Buy scheme must grow fivefold to meet the Government’s one-for-one promise, MPs have been warned.

The National Audit Office (NAO) also explains that the Government pledge to replace homes sold through the scheme “does not necessarily mean like-for-like”. It says that replacement properties can be “a different size, and built in a different area, compared to those that have been sold”.

House Building Must Grow Fivefold to Meet Right to Buy Promise, Warns NAO

House Building Must Grow Fivefold to Meet Right to Buy Promise, Warns NAO

The warnings are included in an NAO report prepared for the Public Accounts Committee (PAC). MPs on the committee are analysing what impact the Housing and Planning Bill will have and whether it will achieve value for money.

The bill, currently going through the House of Lords, plans to give 1.3m housing association tenants the right to buy their homes at discounted prices. The extension of the current scheme would be financed through the sale of high value council homes when they become vacant.

The Government has also vowed to replace each home sold by housing associations, as well as additional properties for those sold by councils, with at least two additional affordable homes for each one sold in London, where there is a chronic shortage of housing. Councils will have three years to replace homes sold to fund the scheme.

However, the NAO report warns MPs that the “pace of replacement will also need to accelerate to keep pace with the target in subsequent years”.

It states: “To meet the target of replacing the roughly 8,512 homes sold in 2014/15 by the end of 2017/18… would require quarterly housing starts to reach around 2,130, a fivefold increase on recent figures of approximately 420 per quarter.”

The NAO also criticises the Department for Communities and Local Government’s (DCLG) assessment of the impact of the policy. It claims the DCLG assessment, “when reviewed against good practice… has weaknesses”.

The NAO says that the DCLG’s assessment fails to give alternative options for achieving its aims, or a summary of other options considered at an earlier stage. It adds that while it identifies a number of groups that may be affected by the bill, “it does not seek to quantify the costs or benefits, and it omits some potential impacts”.

The NAO concludes: “Additionally, though dependent on certain assumptions, the impact assessment does not state those assumptions clearly, use evidence to justify them, or sensitivity analysis to consider the potential impact of uncertainties relating to them.”1

The Government has confirmed that secondary legislation will define what high value is when determining how much each council will pay to fund the sale of housing association homes.

The extension of the Right to Buy scheme to housing association tenants has been continuously criticised. Many believe that it will restrict the availability of affordable housing.

Also, it was recently claimed that many homes sold through the current Right to Buy scheme for council tenants are now being rented out by private landlords.

1 https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Memorandum-extending-the-right-to-buy.pdf

Council Tenants Lose Right to Live in Their Home for Life

Published On: December 11, 2015 at 1:52 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

Council tenants will lose their right to live in their homes for life under plans to impose a five-year limit on new tenancies.

Council Tenants Lose Right to Live in Their Home for Life

Council Tenants Lose Right to Live in Their Home for Life

The proposal has been condemned by the Labour Party, which believes the move will break up communities. However, the Government has quietly tabled an amendment to the Housing and Planning Bill that sets a maximum of five years for new tenancies.

The new rule removes the standard of lifetime council tenancies. In some cases, tenants are even allowed to pass on the right to live in the property to their next of kin. Despite the new policy not applying to current tenancies, those that inherit a council house tenancy will be subject to the new system.

Explaining, Housing Minister Brandon Lewis states: “A secure tenant can currently live in a property for life. This amendment phases out lifetime tenancies.”1

David Cameron first proposed the move in 2010 when he argued that it could help increase social mobility.

He admitted that “not everyone will support this and there will be quite a big argument”. However, he said: “There is a question mark about whether, in future, we should be asking when you are given a council home, is it for a fixed period? Because maybe in five or ten years you will be doing a different job and be better paid and you won’t need that home, you will be able to go into the private sector.”1

The coalition government never enforced the plan, with the then housing minister, Grant Shapps, revealing plans to allow tenancy limits to be set in each local area.

The new legislation forces local authorities to offer all new tenants contracts of between two and five years. At the end of the fixed term, councils must conduct a review of the tenant’s circumstances and decide whether to grant a new tenancy, move the tenant to another more appropriate social rental property or end the tenancy.

If the council decides to terminate the tenancy, they must offer advice to support the tenant into homeownership or help them access other housing options, whichever is suitable.

Labour’s Shadow Cabinet Minister for Housing, John Healey, has criticised the plan, saying people will be “astonished that ministers are legislating to deny families a stable home”.

He continues: “Councils are already able to decide on the length of tenancy they want to offer according to local needs. Margaret Thatcher passed the law to give council tenants secure tenancies, which David Cameron is now tearing up. This generation of Tory ministers seem to have a vendetta against council tenants and council homes.”1 

A Department for Communities and Local Government spokesperson insists the changes will “improve local authorities’ abilities to provide social housing for those who need it most, as long as they need it”.

They add: “This is about ensuring we make the best use of our social housing and that tenancies change as needs change. We want to support households to make the transition into homeownership where they can.”1

It is believed that the Government changed the law as ministers feel that councils are not making effective use of their powers to offer fixed-term tenancies.

The law does not currently apply to housing association tenants.

1 http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/dec/09/council-tenants-lose-lifetime-right-to-live-in-property

Third of Councils Selling Homes Under Right to Buy Haven’t Replaced Properties

Published On: September 21, 2015 at 6:00 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

A third of councils that have sold homes through the Right to Buy scheme have not replaced a single property, according to new figures.

Of the 166 councils in England to use the initiative, just two have replaced every home sold since 2012.

The Department for Communities and Local Government insists: “If councils do not deliver one-for-one replacements the Government will.”1

1 Shaw, V. (2015) No title, Metro, 21 September, p.32