Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

How much does a bad view devalue property prices?

Published On: January 19, 2017 at 11:21 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

Interesting research has revealed how much having a bad view can devalue the price of a property.

The analysis from DirectBlinds.co.uk reveals that 56% of the population believe a house with a poor view will be worth less. 27% said that they would look to spend between £15,000 to £25,000 less on a property with a horrible view.

Views

What’s more, the research found that a poor view does not only affect the value of a property but can also impact on mood. 59% of those questioned said they would feel down due to a bad view.

The poll found that the three worst views are:

An industrial site (23%)

Derelict building (21%)

Motorway (15%)

Those in Edinburgh and in London however should not worry, with the survey finding these cities to have the best views in the UK. On the other hand, Birmingham was found to have the worst views, with 20% of respondents saying they were unhappy with theirs.

How much does a bad view devalue property prices?

How much does a bad view devalue property prices?

David Roebuck, Managing Director of DirectBlinds.co.uk, said: ‘We were amazed to see how much a bad view could potentially affect what people are willing to pay for a property. The potential psychological effect is also concerning. Hopefully homeowners with terrible views will have some beautiful curtains or blinds to cover them up!’[1]

Favourites

Coming out of the city and into the country, it seems that the North is home to some of the best rural views. Lake Windermere was found to have favourite views, followed by the Yorkshire Dales and Ben Nevis.

The top 5 rural views were found to be:

Lake Windermere, Cumbria

Yorkshire Dales

Ben Nevis

The Cotswolds

Land’s End, Cornwall

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/property/how-much-could-a-bad-view-devalue-your-home-by.html

 

 

Will 2017 be the Year the London Property Bubble Finally Bursts?

Published On: January 19, 2017 at 10:18 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,,

A Times survey of leading economists has predicted that 2017 will be the year that the London property bubble finally bursts, almost a decade after the last market crash.

The worrying report prompted online estate agent eMoov.co.uk to analyse the loss in value a similar London property bubble burst would have on house prices across the capital, as well as elsewhere in the UK.

With house prices once again reaching a dangerously inflated level, eMoov looked at the decline in values between the end of 2007 and beginning of 2009 (21 months), when the last property bubble burst, across each region of the UK, before applying that percentage decrease to the current average house price in each area, highlighting the loss that property owners could experience if the London property bubble bursts again this year.

The UK as a whole

At the end of 2007, when the market was on the cusp of collapse, the average UK house price was £189,424. Property values then went into freefall until 2009, plummeting by an average of 16.7% (-£31,618).

If the same 16.7% drop in values was seen today on the current average house price of £217,928, property owners would lose £36,393 on their asset, taking the average value down to £181,535.

London property bubble

Will the 2017 be the Year the London Property Bubble Finally Bursts?

Will the 2017 be the Year the London Property Bubble Finally Bursts?

Of course, it’s the capital where property owners stand to lose the largest sum should the property bubble burst this year.

During the last market crash, those with properties in London saw their assets depreciate by an average of 16.3% (-£48,421). However, since then, the average house price in the capital has soared to £481,648. Therefore, the same percentage decrease would result in a loss of £78,267 today, taking the average value down to £403,381.

Outside the capital 

Although Londoners suffered the greatest monetary loss following the last crash, the capital didn’t see the largest percentage decreases during the last collapse.

Greater declines were recorded in the South East (-17.6%), the East of England (-17.4%), the South West (-17.2%), the East Midlands (-16.8%) and the West Midlands (-16.5%), with property owners in these regions seeing their house prices drop by between £24,000-£42,000.

Although a burst in the property bubble this year would mean a smaller monetary loss than in London, these property owners would still face a substantial hit. The lowest would be felt in the East Midlands (-£29,656), taking the average house price down to £146,868, climbing to a decline of £55,146 in the South East, where the loss would bring the average property value down to £258,188.

North of the border

While the ripple effect of the 2007 crash did reach north of the border, property owners in Scotland saw the smallest depreciation across the UK, at -7.4% (-£10,000).

With the current average house price, £143,033, only marginally higher than it was in 2007, the same decrease in 2017 would result in a similar drop in values, taking the average down to £132,449.

Across in Wales

When the last property bubble burst, Wales experienced the third lowest drop in house prices, behind the North East and Scotland. However, the 15% decline still caused £22,348 to be wiped off the average property value of £148,565.

The property market in Wales has struggled ever since, with the current average house price failing to reach the peak of 2007, at just £146,742.

As a result, it is the only region where a crash in 2017 would actually result in a lower monetary loss for property owners than in the previous crash. A 15% decrease today would see £22,011 taken off the value of the typical property, resulting in an average house price of £124,731.

The Founder and CEO of eMoov, Russell Quirk, comments: “Although the UK property market as a whole is faring very well, there are signs that the London market, particularly the prime central end, is running out of steam heading into 2017.

“Even so, it is unlikely that we will witness a market crash as monumental as the one we experienced a decade ago, so homeowners should rest assured that this research acts as a warning of what the worst case scenario might look like, with London homeowners losing £858 a week in property value.”

He cautions: “However, it is a warning nonetheless, and one that the majority of homeowners should heed. A turbulent year for the property market has seen many buyers and sellers back off from their sale or purchase, and baton down the hatches to wait out the storm.

“Whilst the market itself remains resolute, it will inevitably stutter to a halt without the buyer-seller activity it needs to operate. Those considering a sale now would be wise to act before it’s too late, as a reduction in asking price of a few hundred pounds in the current market climate is a lot easier to stomach than a loss of up to £80,000 a year or so down the line, should the market crash.”

Do you think that the London property bubble could burst this year?

Could the North East lose thousands of cheap rental homes?

Published On: January 19, 2017 at 10:00 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

It has been estimated that up to 26,000 of the North East’s cheapest rental properties could be lost by 2020. One property campaigner in particular feels that this gives more evidence that renters should be given better deals.

Figures

Official Government figures released last week indicated that the number of affordable homes available at social rent in Britain fell by 120,000 between 2012 and 2016. This was largely as a result of Right to Buy.

Forecasts from the Chartered Institute of Housing predict that this number will rise to 250,000 by 2020-which will be an overall drop of 10%.

Should these figures be replicated in the North East, it would leave 25,951 less cheaper homes in the region. By area, this would be a reduction of:

Newcastle-3485

Sunderland-3240

North Tyneside-2494

South Tyneside-2120

County Durham-4500

Northumberland-2584

Could the North East lose thousands of cheap rental homes?

Could the North East lose thousands of cheap rental homes?

Deals

Ajay Jagota, founder of sales and lettings firm KIS, said on the figures: ‘This is yet more evidence of the burning need to give renters a better deal.’[1]

‘It’s no secret that there has been a long-term shift in the UK away from social housing towards the private rented sector. The problem is that the private rented sector hasn’t necessarily evolved to meet the needs of that demand. The biggest example of that is tenancy deposits, which place a huge financial burden on some of our poorest tenants – leaving good people left priced out of good homes rented from good landlords,’ he continued.[1]

Mr Jagota feels that: ‘The easiest way to help them would be to abolish tenancy deposits and for the industry to use sophisticated insurance policies instead. Such a move could save the average renter £1400 while actually protecting property investors assets more effectively.’[1]

‘The craziest thing is that the majority of social landlords do not take deposits, and they seem to manage perfectly well without relying on an out-dated and draconian deposit system. If privately rented homes are the future, why is the privately rented sector stuck in the past?’ he concluded.[1]

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/landlords/thousands-of-the-north-east%E2%80%99s-cheapest-rented-homes-to-be-lost-by-2020.html

Conveyancing Portal Reports Strong End of Year Following Brexit

Published On: January 19, 2017 at 9:23 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

An award-winning conveyancing portal, SortRefer, has reported a strong end of the year following June 2016’s Brexit vote.

Conveyancing Portal Reports Strong End of Year Following Brexit

Conveyancing Portal Reports Strong End of Year Following Brexit

The firm witnessed an upward swing in conveyancing activity after the shock of the Brexit outcome had dissipated.

The number of users on the conveyancing portal rose by 4% by the end of 2016, following a dip caused by Brexit uncertainty. In the two months after the Brexit vote, conveyancing business dropped, but, by November, overall instructions had increased by 5% over the pre-vote figures.

In line with the latest data from the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML), SoftRefer reports a significant increase in remortgage instructions, which rose by 19% in the six months following the vote.

Buy-to-let instructions were up by 6% over the same period, suggesting that landlords are still keen to purchase investment properties ahead of the forthcoming reduction in mortgage interest tax relief.

According to the firm’s Kevin Tunnicliffe, 2016 was the year of surprises in the property market.

He says: “We should have realised that if Leicester City could win the Premier League title, then anything was capable of being overturned and so it transpired. The result of the Brexit vote, no matter on which side of the issue you stood, was a complete surprise. After the initial shock and the realisation that the world had not stopped spinning, activity came back to normal for us and, in fact, we ended the year very strongly.

“I think pundits will be very cautious about their predictions for 2017 after what happened in 2016. As the CML is suggesting, only a small percentage increase in likely lending levels this year, I think that is a clue to how we should all view the prospects for 2017.”

Indeed, it will be interesting to observe how the forecasts change and develop following Theresa May’s crucial speech on the UK’s Brexit strategy on Tuesday.

Is inflation a bigger threat than Brexit?

Published On: January 18, 2017 at 2:19 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,,

A leading estate agent has moved to express his view that inflation is a bigger threat to the confidence of the housing market than Brexit.

In a statement, former RICS residential chairman and London estate agent Jeremy Leaf, said: ‘If the cost of everything is going up, people feel poorer and less inclined to take on further debt. With the housing market it always comes down to confidence and if people see bad news, they tend to overreact, sit on their hands and do nothing.’[1

Announcement

The statement from Mr Leaf comes on the heels of an announcement that inflation has risen to 1.6%, the highest for 18 months. This increase was larger than expected and was attributed to the effects of the fall of Sterling since Britain decided to leave the EU.

Leaf’s comments also came after the ONS released its figures for house price rises over the year to November.

Is inflation a bigger threat than Brexit?

Is inflation a bigger threat than Brexit?

According to this report, prices increased by an average of 6.7%, up from 6.4% in October.

The average price of a property in the UK was £218,000, £14,000 greater than November 2015 and £2,000 more than in October. The average price of a property in England is now £234,000.

Wales saw prices increase by 4.1% in the same period to £147,000 and in Scotland, by 3.3% to hit £143,000.

‘The house price index findings are not too surprising because … they are a little bit historic. We expect to see some moderation in price growth in future as we have already seen on the ground in the past month or so. Shortage of stock and increased nervousness is showing itself in only slightly higher prices and lower activity,’ Leaf concluded.[2]

[1] https://www.estateagenttoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2017/1/inflation-bigger-problem-for-housing-market-than-brexit-claims-top-agent

New Buy-to-Let Lending Remains Flat, but Remortgages are High

Published On: January 18, 2017 at 11:16 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,,

New buy-to-let lending remained flat at the end of last year, but remortgages in the sector are high, distorting the outlook for the market, according to the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML).

Instead, home movers and first time buyers dominated mortgage lending in November 2016 – the latest month for which data is available.

House purchase loans

New Buy-to-Let Lending Remains Flat, but Remortgages are High

New Buy-to-Let Lending Remains Flat, but Remortgages are High

Lending to homeowners increased by 5% between October and November, to a total of £11 billion, up by 2% on an annual basis. Homeowners took out 60,800 loans, up by 5% on the previous month and 0.2% over the year.

First time buyers borrowed £4.7 billion, up by 4% month-on-month and 9% on November 2015. This equated to 30,100 loans, up by 5% on October and 8% annually.

Meanwhile, home movers borrowed £6.3 billion, up by 7% on the previous month, but down 5% compared with November 2015. This represented 30,700 loans, up by 6% on a monthly basis, but down 6% year-on-year.

Buy-to-let lending

Buy-to-let lending reached £3.2 billion in November last year, up by 10% on October, but down 9% on an annual basis. Landlords borrowed 21,000 loans in total, up by 13% on the month, but down 10% when compared to November 2015.

The CML reports that these figures make it look like buy-to-let lending has returned to times before the Stamp Duty rush, when 23,500 loans were recorded in March 2016 and 21,900 in April 2016, before dropping to around 18,000 each month for the rest of the year.

But the latest figures are slightly skewed by remortgages, as this type of loan actually made up 14,000 of the 21,000 loans lent in the buy-to-let sector.

The CML data also shows that the proportion of household income used to service capital and interest rates reached another historic low in November for both first time buyers and home movers, at 17.5%.

The Director General of the CML, Paul Smee, comments on the figures: “November lending reflected stable market conditions. Overall, 2016 did not match recent years in terms of house purchase lending growth, but lending remained resilient through regulatory and political change, and aspirations for homeownership remain strong in the UK.

“Our forecasts for 2017 may be less bullish than a year ago, as economic uncertainty weighs on the market, but we still predict 1.2m transactions and a slight increase in gross lending to £248 billion.”

He looks at the buy-to-let sector: “Buy-to-let lending, driven by remortgage activity, saw its strongest monthly lending level since the Stamp Duty changes on second properties introduced last April. Despite this, we expect buy-to-let lending levels in both 2016 and 2017 to prove lower than their 2015 recent peak, as further tax changes take effect.”