Posts with tag: tenants

Proposed ban on agent fees continues to split opinion

Published On: June 26, 2017 at 9:08 am

Author:

Categories: Property News,Tenant Fees Ban

Tags: ,,,

The proposed ban on letting agent fees charged to tenants by landlords and letting agents continues to split opinion within the industry.

Many experts suggest that if the fees are banned, these costs will subsequently be passed on to landlords, who will need to reclaim these fees from elsewhere – probably through increased rents.

Gains

This said, there is little doubt that some agents have previously overcharged their tenants for financial gain. Now, the Government has chosen to act, with the proposed ban being welcomed by some leading industry figures.

Alex Harrington, group lettings managing director at Dexters, noted: ‘Dexters supports the ban on tenants fees being brought forward and the limiting of any additional charges to tenants.’[1]

‘We have always kept any charges to tenants as low as possible, making sure any financial contribution from a tenant has been transparent before they consider renting through us and that it is wholly relevant to the work carried out on their behalf,’ he continued.[1]

Charlie Woods, senior lettings director at Russell Simpson, also welcomed the plans.

Proposed ban on agent fees continues to split opinion

Proposed ban on agent fees continues to split opinion

Mr Woods said: ‘From our point of view it’s business as usual, for quite a while now we haven’t charged the standard administration fee, because we simply don’t see the need. We also don’t charge the landlord their portion as they are paying us a fee already so we’ve always felt it was unjustified to ask for anything else on top.’

‘There has been talk of some agents pushing the fees onto the landlord, who could subsequently increase the rent to cover the additional costs. However, I feel this is unlikely, as with the sales market, overly high prices in the rental market stand out and the properties will simply not let, so all-in-all this will be a very positive move for tenants.’[1]

Leap Forwards

Calum Brannan, CEO of No Agent, sees the new Tenant’s Fees Bill as a ‘huge leap forward for the letting market.’ Brannan suggests that the industry, ‘has been double dipping and making profits from both tenants and landlords simultaneously for too long.’[1]

However, Tim Wright, product director at KeyAGENT, observed: ‘With the Tenants Fee Bill now firmly on the horizon, agents will be under increasing pressure to deliver exceptional service in tougher conditions.’[1]

[1] https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2017/6/some-agents-welcome-the-governments-plans-to-cut-tenants-fees

 

London has the 9th Least Affordable Rental Market Among the World’s Best Cities

Published On: June 26, 2017 at 8:17 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

Being a tenant is becoming increasingly common, but in which cities of the world are renters’ needs most catered for? Well it turns out that it’s not London, which has the ninth least affordable rental market among the world’s top cities of opportunity…

A great city must present a good deal of opportunities to its residents, which means that it shouldn’t hurt to live there.

Apartment search platform RENTCafé has already analysed rent prices in the top global financial centres, but it is now looking at the world in a wider angle – not just restricted to cities with outstanding activity in the financial sector. It’s also bringing the affordability of local rents into the equation.

In its latest Cities of Opportunity report, global professional services firm PwC shortlisted the world’s best cities to work and live in. Its top-30 ranking is the result of an in-depth analysis of the most prosperous global business, finance and culture capitals, which looks at ten different indicators – including, but not limited to: infrastructure, intellectual capital, sustainability and ease of doing business. All of these factors are essential for a great environment.

With this list in its hands, RENTCafé found out how much money people earn in these cities and whether these salaries are high enough to afford a rental property.

Firstly, let’s look at PwC’s best Cities of Opportunity:

  1. London, Great Britain
  2. Singapore, Singapore
  3. Toronto, Canada
  4. Paris, France
  5. Amsterdam, Netherlands
  6. Manhattan (New York City), USA
  7. Stockholm, Sweden
  8. San Francisco, USA
  9. Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  10. Sydney, Australia
  11. Seoul, South Korea
  12. Berlin, Germany
  13. Chicago, USA
  14. Los Angeles, USA
  15. Tokyo, Japan
  16. Madrid, Spain
  17. Dubai, UAE
  18. Milan, Italy
  19. Beijing, China
  20. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  21. Shanghai, China
  22. Moscow, Russia
  23. Mexico City, Mexico
  24. Johannesburg, South Africa
  25. São Paulo, Brazil
  26. Bogotá, Colombia
  27. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  28. Jakarta, Indonesia
  29. Mumbai, India
  30. Lagos, Nigeria

RENTCafé then checked out the average rents in these markets, as well as their median incomes, and calculated the rent-to-income ratios.

Traditionally, housing costs exceeding 30% of a household’s income are viewed as a red flag, so this became RENTCafé’s first threshold. Thus, it considered the cities where the average rent was 30% or less of the local median household income to be burden-free.

It then divided the remainder of the list into two – moderately (31-50% rent-to-income) and severely (51%+) rent-burdened cities.

Here’s how the PwC list swapped around when these rent-to-income ratios were applied:

London has the 9th Least Affordable Rental Market Among the World's Best Cities

London has the 9th Least Affordable Rental Market Among the World’s Best Cities

The twist on the data puts these cities into a completely different perspective.

Granted, London sliding back 21 places when ranked by rental affordability was unsurprising, but what’s more shocking is that seven of the top ten most affordable Cities of Opportunity came straight from the lower third of the initial ranking.

Kuala Lumpur, Moscow and Johannesburg were named the most affordable Cities of Opportunity.

The trio launched from 20th, 22nd and 24th places in the original ranking, respectively. Still, the two South American markets of the 4th and 5th places – Bogotá and Rio de Janeiro – have moved the farthest from their original positions – 22 places, up from 26th and 27th respectively.

RENTCafé believes that great cities must obviously come with price tags to match – but paying the rent in these Cities of Opportunity isn’t always so painful…

In 13 of these cities, the rent-to-income ratio is comfortably below the 30% threshold. And although Tokyo, Hong Kong and Madrid technically fall into the moderately rent-burdened category, people in these cities still spend less than a third of their income to pay the rent. If you look at it this way, renting a property in more than half of the world’s Cities of Opportunity shouldn’t be too difficult.

Then again, these are Cities of Opportunity, and what would be the point of these opportunities if only a lucky few could afford to utilise them?

Which brings us to the lower end of the list…

Mexico City, Manhattan and Lagos are the least tenant-friendly Cities of Opportunity in 2017.

Although opportunities are plentiful in these cities, no amount of amenities can overlook the rent burden issue. Renters in Mexico City, Manhattan and Lagos face severe rent burdens, meaning that rent takes up more than half of a household’s income each month (60%, 59% and 57% respectively).

In other words, in an average family with two earners, one of them works only to pay the rent – and even that’s not enough. Tenants in Los Angeles also cash out 47% of their income each month on rent, and the situation isn’t much better in Paris (46%) or Singapore (44%).

Access to the great opportunities these cities offer clearly requires some form of compromise – rental affordability isn’t always their best charms. However, the good news is that there are plenty of other great cities around the world where renting a property isn’t an issue; they’re just not the best ones.

UK rental market bounces back in May

Published On: June 20, 2017 at 8:56 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

Rental market activity recovered during May – putting an end to fears of a prolonged slowdown in the market.

The most recent report from Agency Express shows that after slower market conditions throughout Britain last month, activity improved during May.

Improvement

Agency Expresses’ Property Activity Index shows that national figures for properties ‘let’ in May increased by 13.8% month-on-month. New listings ‘to let’ rose by 15.8%.

Across the UK, 11 out of 12 regions recorded by the Index saw a rise in new listings to let, alongside those actually let.

The top performing region in May was the South East of England, where homes to let rose by 29.2% month-on-month. Properties let increased by 31.4%.

Other strong performing regions included the North East, London, Wales and the South West, where properties to let rose by 25.6%, 23.7%, 23.5% and 21.6% respectively.

In addition, the West Midlands, East Midlands and the South West saw a rise of 23.4%. 21.8% and 17.9% respectively in the number of homes let.

UK rental market bounces back in May

UK rental market bounces back in May

Falls

The largest falls in this month’s Index were recorded in the West Midlands and East Anglia. In the West Midlands, figures for new listings to let fell to stand at -2.4%, while a dip in East Anglia saw the number of properties let sit at -0.9%.

However, a slowdown in May is certainly not uncommon for these regions – with both faring better than they did 12 months earlier.

Stephen Watson, managing director of Agency Express, observed: ‘The Property Activity Index historically reports a decline in activity throughout May for many regions. This month however we have witnessed a good level of activity across the UK lettings market with some regional pockets recording record bests. Moving in to June and July we would expect a further increase in activity.’[1]

[1] https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2017/6/uk-rental-market-bounces-back-with-greater-activity-anticipated-over-summer

 

Retiree renters paying much more than one decade ago

Published On: June 12, 2017 at 9:39 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

A new report from Countrywide has revealed that retiree tenants are paying a lot more in rent than they were ten years ago.

During the last twelve months, retiree renters paid a total of £3.7bn in rent – a rise of 216% on the £1.2bn paid in 2007.

This rise means that £1 in every £14 paid by tenants in the UK comes from a pensioner. In fact, the total amount of rent paid by private tenants in Britain during the last year hit £50.6bn.

Rent Rises

In 2017, pensioners paid an average of £810 per month – a rise of 0.3% on last year and 19% since 2007. However, the typical retiree actually paid 12% less than the average tenant, as they were likely to rent a smaller property.

75% of retiree tenants rent a one or two-bedroom home, in comparison to 66% of all tenants.

Pensioners now make up 8% of the total number of tenants, in comparison to 5.2% in 2007. The greatest proportion of retiree tenants can be found in Wales, where almost 1 in 5 tenants are of pensioner age. The South West and North East have the next greatest proportion.

However, London has the fewest, with just 3.5% of retiree tenants.

In Britain as a whole, 53% of tenant pensioners live alone, while 81% are over 65.

Retiree renters paying much more than one decade ago

Retiree renters paying much more than one decade ago

Slow Growth

During May, the cost of renting a home was just 0.1% higher than it was in May 2016. In the capital, rents fell for the seventh straight month.

Johnny Morris, Research Director at Countrywide, observed: ‘The rental market can no longer be typified by the image of carefree, young professionals.  More than half of tenants are over 30 and the number of pensioners renting has reached record levels.  And with younger generations growing up much less likely to be homeowners, tenants are getting older with an ever more diverse group of people calling the rented sector home.’[1]

‘Seven consecutive months of falling rents in the capital are starting to show signs of rippling out across the country with rents down in over half of regions outside London. The number of homes on the market remains well up on last years’ levels, softening rental growth,’ he added.[1]

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/landlords/retirees-rent-triples-in-10-years.html

 

Homeowners more content than renters

Published On: June 8, 2017 at 8:50 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

The majority of property owners in the UK are pleased with their property – with those aged over 55 most content.

However, tenants are not as pleased generally with where they live, according to new research from TheHouseShop.

Happiness

In all, 83% of home owners said that they were content with their property, in comparison to 54% of tenants renting a property from a private landlord.

What’s more, tenants were more likely to be more unhappy with their property. 21% of tenants asked said that they were either fairly or very unhappy with their current dwelling, as opposed to 8% of owners.

Nick Marr, co-founder of TheHouseShop, believes that the findings are not overly surprising, given groups such as Shelter and Generation Rent have long called for better standards and protection for tenants.

Homeowners more content than renters

Homeowners more content than renters

Marr observed: ‘For home owners, the commitment to a property is much more permanent than it is for renters, and buyers will spend a lot of time and effort choosing their ideal property and carrying out improvement works over the years to perfect it.’[1]

‘Tenants, on the other hand, are rarely allowed to make even superficial changes or improvements to their homes, so it is highly unlikely that they will ever achieve the same level of happiness as home owners,’ he added.[1]

Divide

The research uncovered a clear divide between the young and old age groups. The over 55’s were by far the happiest, with 85% happy with their property.

On the other hand, 25 to 34 year olds were least likely to be very happy with their properties, with only 16% stating that this was the case. Only one in twenty over 55’s said that they were unhappy with their home.

[1] http://www.propertywire.com/news/uk/owners-uk-happy-home-private-rented-sector-tenants/

Calls for £30,000 fine for larger agents who flaunt proposed fees ban

Published On: June 6, 2017 at 1:17 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

The more larger letting agents found to be in breach of the proposed ban on letting agent fees should receive fines of up to £30,000 to ensure compliance.

That is the view of the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health, which has revealed what was in its submission under the Government’s consultation process around the ban.

Ban on Fees

The proposed ban on fees was outlined in last year’s Autumn Statement. The CIEH has given its backing to the ban on all letting agent fees, arguing that this would get rid of some barriers facing tenants in moving out of a sub-standard home.

Representing the workforce of environmental health professionals that undertake inspections in the private rental sector, the CIEH has recommended fines of up to £30,000 for big property managing agents.

In addition, the membership body has recommended that holding deposits should not be exempt from any ban, as this could cause issues with loopholes to exploit tenants. An example of this could be agents holding onto more than a single tenant’s deposit for the same property.

It notes that holding deposits pose an extra barrier to tenants wishing to move home, as they heighten the amount of money required to secure a new tenancy. Should these be allowed, the CIEH wants to see them registered under a mandatory client money protection compensation scheme in order to avoid any abuse.

Tenant Rights

Also in its submission, the CIEH suggests that tenants should be given accessible information surrounding their rights and obligations on letting agents. These should include information on how to lodge a complaint with the correct enforcement body.

CIEH believe that the ban on agent fees should apply to landlords and third parties, in order to avoid any additional charges to the tenant through a different route. It suggests that premium sections of the market should not be exempt.

The only reason for exclusions to the ban, the organisation suggests, should be due to malicious tenant actions.

Calls for £30,000 fine for larger agents who flaunt proposed fees ban

Calls for £30,000 fine for larger agents who flaunt proposed fees ban

Standards

Tamara Sandoul, CIEH policy manager, feels that the underlying point behind the suggestions is to help improve standards and conditions in the sector, while protecting tenants at the same time.

Sandoul said: ‘The private rented sector is such an important part of the housing market, providing homes for people who otherwise cannot afford to buy their own, especially the vulnerable and those on low incomes.’[1]

‘While the vast majority of letting agents are responsible, there are those who exploit tenants by charging them extortionately high fees. A comprehensive ban on letting agents’ fees is a very positive step forward. It will give tenants greater freedom to move out of properties that are hazardous and in poor condition, which in-turn should drive up standards and quality of rented housing,’ she continued.[1]

Concluding, she noted: ‘We do not expect to see higher rents because of the ban as the cost of referencing new tenants is likely to be small in comparison to the costs of maintaining a property to a good standard. At the moment managing agents are charging both the landlord and the tenant fees, but this ban should help to increase competition between letting agents and help to drive the total costs down.’[1]

[1] http://www.propertywire.com/news/uk/call-fines-30000-flout-upcoming-lettings-fee-ban-england/