Posts with tag: living in London

High London House Prices are Cutting Graduates Off from Best Jobs

Published On: September 17, 2015 at 4:58 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

The high cost of housing in the capital is pricing disadvantaged young graduates out of working in London, reveals research from the Sutton Trust.

Increasing rents are making it harder than ever for young people to move to London, says the report. It adds that those who can live in the capital are sharing accommodation and paying a high proportion of their income to a landlord.

The study indicates that there is a widening gap between those who can rely on their families for financial support to live in London, and those who cannot.

High London House Prices are Cutting Graduates Off from Best Jobs

High London House Prices are Cutting Graduates Off from Best Jobs

Figures released in the report show that there are now more graduates (15%) living with their parents than on their own (11%).

The firm studied data for the higher education rate of young people in certain areas, and found that those from educationally privileged neighbourhoods are most likely to be working in London.

Those that grew up in the most disadvantaged parts of the country are often priced out entirely, losing out on jobs in industries such as the media, law and finance.

The research shows that just 6% of new graduates moved to London from the most disadvantaged 20% of neighbourhoods, compared with 42% from the most advantaged 20% of areas.

It urges candidates in the 2016 London mayoral election to consider new housing schemes for young professionals, including short-term student-like accommodation and private rental developments, designed specifically for young people.

The study found that since 2001, London’s population grew by 12%, while the housing stock rose by just 9%. High housing demand has left many in a trap, where they are unable to save for a deposit for a home.

The amount of 25-34-year-olds living in shared housing in the capital has increased by 28% over the last ten years, and last year, there were just two boroughs – Bexley and Barking and Dagenham – where the average property prices were under eight times the average person’s income.

Chairman of the Sutton Trust and the Education Endowment Foundation, Sir Peter Lampl, says: “So many of our leading jobs are based in London, yet the current housing situation is making it increasingly difficult for graduates from less advantaged homes to move here.

“Our brightest young people deserve the same chances to reach the top of their professions or to be able to turn their talents into businesses, whatever their background.”1

The issue with unaffordable rents is so severe that accountancy firm Deloitte is setting up a new initiative for its graduate intake, housing them in the former Athletes’ Village in the Olympic Park.

New employees will be able to sign up for apartments without paying for credit checks or agency fees, also receiving two weeks’ free rent.

The company says that 5% of its graduate intake in 2014 had to share a bedroom because renting is so expensive, while others lived in homes where communal living space had been converted into additional bedrooms to make renting affordable.

1 http://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/sep/16/london-house-prices-cutting-off-graduates-from-best-jobs

The Worst Place to Live in the UK

Published On: August 11, 2015 at 4:57 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

It may be the most affordable borough to live in within the capital, but Barking and Dagenham is the least happy place to live in the country.

It has the cheapest property prices in London, but Barking and Dagenham scored the lowest in five of Rightmove’s 12 criteria to judge residents’ happiness. The area came at the bottom of a list of 130 spots.

Barking and Dagenham was voted the worst for community, area upkeep, safety, amenity and neighbourliness.

Separate research earlier this year also found that Dagenham is Britain’s most burgled town.

Darren Rodwell, Barking and Dagenham Council leader, says: “I find this report quite amusing, as we have just had tens of thousands of people coming to a series of events celebrating 50 years of our borough.

“This was the largest community celebration of its kind in London and as a result, we even had Her Majesty the Queen coming here a couple of weeks ago to see our fantastic borough and residents.”

He says the area is ready for growth and development, stating: “London is moving east and we are at the heart of it.”1

The north Yorkshire town of Harrogate was voted the happiest place to live for the third consecutive year, coming first for area upkeep, pride and safety.

At the bottom of the list were Hounslow, Brent, Harrow and Newham, indicating that high house prices in London have a negative impact on locals.

Of all London boroughs, Richmond was rated the happiest.

Traditionally, house prices are higher down south, but Barking and Dagenham’s average price of £225,455 is much lower than Harrogate’s £277,049.

Top 10 happiest places to live in the UK

Position

Area

1 Harrogate
2 Shrewsbury
3 Ipswich
4 York
5 Chester
6 Inverness
7 Llandrindod Wells
8 Hemel Hempstead
9 Watford
10 Blackpool

Top 10 unhappiest places to live in the UK

Position

Area

1 Barking and Dagenham
2 Hounslow
3 Brent
4 Harrow
5 Newham
6 Tower Hamlets
7 Greenwich
8 Luton
9 Hillingdon
10 Haringey

 

1 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/constructionandproperty/11785492/The-happiness-index-Where-is-the-worst-place-to-live-in-the-UK.html

London is the Third Most Expensive City to Live in

London is the third most expensive city in the world to live in, according to new research.

Beating London are wealthy cities in the Cayman Islands and Switzerland, revealed figures from Expatistan, which uses crowdfunded data to create a cost of living index for a number of world cities.

London came third in the study, behind Grand Cayman and Zurich.

The research also revealed that London has the second most expensive public transport in the world, the third highest utility costs and the fifth most expensive theatre tickets.

It is the second most expensive city in Europe, after Zurich, and the most expensive in the UK.

The most expensive cities to live in around the world

London is the Third Most Expensive City to Live in

London is the Third Most Expensive City to Live in

Position

City

Country/Area

1 Grand Cayman Cayman Islands
2 Zurich Switzerland
3 London UK
4 Geneva Switzerland
5 New York City USA
6 San Francisco USA
7 Washington DC USA
8 Bern Switzerland
9 Hong Kong China
10 Singapore Singapore

Contrastingly, Madras in India is named the least expensive city to live in in the world. The bottom of the list is predominantly made up of small cities in Eastern Europe.

The cheapest city to live in within Western Europe is Lisbon, Portugal, which has a cost of living index of 127 compared to London’s 308.

London has dropped down the list in the past year, from its number two spot in July last year.

Compared to other UK cities, London is significantly more expensive – 36% more than Manchester, 38% above Glasgow and 40% pricier than Belfast.

After London, the most expensive UK city is Aberdeen, which has high rents and house prices due to its position as a centre for Britain’s oil industry in the North Sea.

Although the data is not good news for Londoners, it comes as no surprise.

In June, London rents reached a peak, making them over double the national average. In May, Oxford Economics revealed that it expects the average London house price to be £1m by 2030.

A study by Liverpool Economics, on behalf of four London borough councils, has also found that if the Government implements its plans to extend the Right to Buy scheme to housing association tenants, rent prices will be pushed even higher.

 

Average First Time Buyer Home in London is £300,000

The average price paid for a property by a first time buyer in London has exceeded £300,000 for the first time.

In the rest of the UK, the average price for the same buyer is just £155,782.

First time buyers in the capital must also raise a deposit of over £67,000, compared with £25,890 elsewhere.

Average First Time Buyer Home in London is £300,000

Average First Time Buyer Home in London is £300,000

Data from Your Move and Reeds Rains indicates that although the average starter home in London is now £304,205, around 9,100 first time buyers purchased a home in the capital in the first quarter (Q1) of 2015.

This figure was 11,700 in Q1 2014, but the average starter home was £266,497 then. However, the amount of first time buyers is likely to grow again, as high-end buyers tail off.

The latest House Price Index from Land Registry reveals that property prices in the capital are beginning to steady, at a slight 0.2% rise in the last month.

However, this will not help aspiring buyers, who saw a huge increase last year, meaning the annual price rise is 11.3% and the average house price is £462,700. This is two and a half times the average value in England and Wales of £178,007.

London’s resilient prices mean that outer areas, which offer better value for money, are benefitting from more buyers. More expensive boroughs of the capital are barely seeing rises above inflation.

The best performing areas of the capital in the last year were Newham, up 19% to an average of £291,364, and Greenwich, up 18.8% to £353,926.

The worst area was Kensington and Chelsea, where average prices increased 5.2% to just under £1.3m.

The borough saw the highest property price growth during the coalition government, at just under 48% in five years. Two other Conservative areas, the City of London and the City of Westminster, experienced increases of over 40% in the same period.

Just three Labour constituencies were in the top ten property price performers, Tooting and Islington North, both up 38.2%, and Tottenham at 35.7%.

The only places surpassing London’s rises are the commutable and fairly inexpensive areas of Thurrock, Hertfordshire and Reading, which have all experienced increases of 13%.

 

Cheapest Place to Rent in London Revealed

Published On: May 7, 2015 at 4:19 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Plumstead in South East London has been named the most affordable place to rent in the capital, found property portal Rightmove.

Rightmove researched the average asking rents of two-bedroom properties in London and discovered that Plumstead is the cheapest, at £1,143 per month. This is a huge seven times cheaper than the most expensive in Mayfair. 

Cheapest Place to Rent in London Revealed

Cheapest Place to Rent in London Revealed

Demand for rental accommodation in the capital has reached record highs in the last year, with a 69% rise in email enquiries from home-hunters to letting agents.

The South East and East London feature strongly in the top 20 cheapest areas, with Middle Park the second most affordable at £1,192 a month and Eltham the third at £1,195.

In Greater London, the average asking rent for a two-bed is £2,216 per month, an increase of over 6% in the last 12 months from £2,086. This also rose faster than the previous annual growth of 3.7%.

It is believed that the Outer London market is fuelling these increases, as the average rent here has risen by 8.4% in the past year to £1,493, compared with the smaller growth of 2.3% the year before.

Head of Lettings at Rightmove, Sam Mitchell says: “Rental asking prices have been steadily increasing in the past few years, following a short lull post-Olympics.

“Those struggling to find a place they can afford could consider these more affordable areas, and visit them to see if they would suit their lifestyle. Factors like being close to a tube station or a good school will always come at a premium, but it will help if you’re looking in an area with a below average London rental price to begin with.”1

Lettings Manager at Robinson Jackson, Alexa Joyeux adds: “We started noticing an increased demand for Plumstead among tenants when the DLR opened in nearby Woolwich in 2009. As soon as work started on the Crossrail station, enquiries stepped up another gear.

“In fact, in the last 18 months, we have seen rental values rise in the region of 20% as tenants position themselves in Plumstead ahead of Crossrail’s opening.

“We’ve also noticed a change in the type of tenant applying for properties; they’re coming from further afield and many of those have been priced out of areas like Bow in East London and South West London boroughs.

“Plumstead, for the time being, retains a level of affordability mixed with a good housing stock – lots of pretty Victorian terraces – wide open spaces that include Plumstead Common, Winn’s Common and Oxleas Woods, plus a very short journey to the revived and regenerated Woolwich town centre.”1

1 http://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2015/5/plumstead-named-most-affordable-rental-spot-and-in-london

Which City is Better than London for Young People?

Published On: May 6, 2015 at 11:01 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

London has risen from seventh to second place in the Youthful Cities Index, but one city still beats it.

The British capital is the most popular place in Europe for young people to live, but New York City is the global winner for youth desirability. NYC rose two places in this year’s survey.

The index was introduced last year, in which London ranked seventh. This year, the capital came first in the areas of safety, health and travel, pushing Berlin down to third. 2014’s winner Toronto fell below San Francisco and Paris to sixth place. But London did not compare to NYC in the music, film and fashion categories.

Which City is Better than London for Young People?

Which City is Better than London for Young People?

London is also the second most sustainable city in the world, behind Frankfurt, due to high house prices.1

In the Youthful Cities Affordability Index from October London came sixth, behind Paris, Toronto, Los Angeles, Chicago and Berlin, because of expensive rent, pricey public transport and high sales tax. NYC, however, came tenth.

Toronto-based strategic consultancy Decode conducts the index by surveying over 10,000 young people in 55 countries on topics such as safety, affordability, diversity and food.

Nine cities in North America, five from Europe and three in Asia came in the top 20, with Tokyo in 12th place.

Mexico City is the highest ranking of Latin American cities, in ninth place, with Tel Aviv in the Middle East in 14th place. Africa was included at 35th place with Johannesburg.

Cofounder of Youthful Cities, Sonja Miokovic, says: “Half of the world’s population is under 30-years-old and half now live in cities. Youth and cities, especially the largest ones, will together shape the future of the planet. That’s why it is essential for cities to appeal to youth and actively find ways to unlock their potential.

“We are at a time of unprecedented opportunity to transform the places we live, work and play by engaging the world’s largest untapped resource: youth!”1

Data revealed that Tehran is the most affordable city to live, followed by Detroit. San Francisco and Mexico City have the best employment prospects, and San Francisco is also the best place for environment and entrepreneurship. Toronto is the best city for diversity, Madrid for digital access, Warsaw for education, and Tokyo for food and nightlife.

Moscow won in three areas: public space, sports and financial services.

The city with the highest youth population, the percentage of the total population aged between 15-29, is Dar es Salaam in Tanzania.

1 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/11574377/Only-one-city-in-the-world-is-better-than-London-for-young-people-to-live.html