Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Living Near a Park will Cost you 70% More than the UK Average

Published On: February 23, 2017 at 10:19 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

Buying a property near a park will cost you a whopping 70% more than the UK average, according to the latest research by online estate agent eMoov.co.uk.

The agent looked at eight major cities across the UK and the average cost of purchasing a property in each, compared with the price of homes surrounding each city’s best and biggest parks.

Although living in the city has many upsides, lots of green space isn’t one of them. Therefore, buying near a park, for both homeowners and landlords, can come with a premium.

eMoov found that properties surrounding 24 of the UK’s best city parks cost an average of 70% more than the average UK house price of £206,909.

Despite this, there are affordable options within these cities for those looking to live or let near green space.

England

Across England, properties surrounding the 13 major parks are 67% more expensive than the English average.

Liverpool

Average house price: £153,646

Park average: £215,061

Liverpool’s park house prices are 39.9% higher than the city’s average property value. A home surrounding the picturesque Calderstones Park costs £249,876. However, there are more affordable options, with Sefton and Otterspool Parks both costing £197,653 on average.

Manchester 

Average house price: £167,284

Park average: £180,110

Properties near Manchester parks aren’t as expensive as Liverpool’s, at 7.6% higher, but a park-side property can still set you back a fair bit. The average property near Prestwich Forest Park costs £193,904, while Heaton Park homes cost £198,202. Nevertheless, Wythenshaw Park is £19,059 below the city’s average, at £148,225.

Living Near a Park will Cost you 70% More than the UK Average

Living Near a Park will Cost you 70% More than the UK Average

Birmingham

Average house price: £176,012

Park average: £168,721

Topping the list for affordable park-side properties is Birmingham, where homes around the city’s parks are actually cheaper than the city average (-4%). Despite Cannon Hill Park’s higher than average price tag of £227,204, both Sutton Park and Sheldon Country Park have cheaper property values of £118,500 and £160,459 respectively.

London

With the high cost of buying London property in general, it is no surprise that living close to a park will demand a higher budget – 83% more to be precise. The London average of £603,422 soars to £1,105,366 if you want to purchase near some green space.

Camden

Average house price: £1,063,292

Park average: £1,320,985

Unsurprisingly, Hampstead Heath Park is £257,693 above the borough’s average, and a huge £717,563 above the average house price in the capital.

Richmond 

Average house price: £801,978

Park average: £810,279

Property values surrounding Richmond Park in southwest London are £8,301 above the borough’s average, and £206,857 higher than London as a whole.

Kensington and Chelsea

Average house price: £2,005,744

Park average: £1,831,411 

The area around Hyde Park is the best place for high-end homeowners to look for park-side properties, as homes bordering the park are lower than the borough as a whole. But at more than £1.8m, it’s hardly an affordable option.

Bromley

Average house price: £478,378

Park average: £458,788

There is a silver lining for those looking to invest in homes close to green spaces in London, and that is Bromley. Property surrounding Crystal Palace Park is £144,634 less than the capital’s average and £19,590 below the borough’s average price. Therefore, it is the most affordable part of the capital for urban and green living.

Scotland 

The average house price surrounding six of the best parks in Scottish cities is £236,010 – a 39.8% increase on the average value across the country.

Edinburgh 

Average house price: £246,275

Park average: £300,920

Living near Edinburgh’s Holyrood Park is a cheap option, at £198,270, although park-side properties typically boast a 22.1% premium. Prices in Inverleith Park (£286,361) and Princes Street Garden (£418,129) jump drastically.

Glasgow

Average house price: £160,096

Park average: £171,099

Linn Park in Glasgow is £5,548 below the city’s average, while Pollock Country Park and Kelvin Grove Park come at a much higher price, resulting in a premium of 6.8% more the average.

Wales 

Park-side properties in cities across Wales cost 24.1% higher than the average.

Cardiff

Average house price: £216,083

Park average: £220,723

Bute Park homes cost £196,286, while Victoria Park has an average property value of £202,477. But property surrounding Roath Park is well above Cardiff’s average, at £263,407.

Swansea

Average house price: £161,144

Park average: £201,209

In Swansea, the average house price surrounding three of the city’s biggest and best parks is 28.8% higher than the city average.

The Founder and CEO of eMoov, Russell Quirk, says: “When considering a property purchase, it is easy to get wrapped up in the important factors, such as commuter links and the standard of education in the area, but this research shows that even the more social amenities, such as parks and open spaces, can push up the price of a property.

“For families looking to have all the amenities that a city offers but still have green space for their children, Birmingham is an excellent choice, with the most affordable options across the city. With the rising prices across London, affordable property surrounding parks is becoming almost impossible to find, although Crystal Palace offers a slight ray of light.”

He adds: “Places like parks and other green areas are becoming of greater importance to buyers, particularly those with children or animals, so they can escape the confines of their homes. As a result, it is no surprise that living next to a large, spacious park, as with a Tube station, can persuade buyers to part with more cash than they might elsewhere.”

Agency forced to pay out as students win deposit case

Published On: February 23, 2017 at 9:56 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

A group of students in Bristol have been successful in a court case, after a letting agency acting on behalf of a landlord took money from their deposit.

The six students in question received a letter from Digs letting agency, telling them that a total of £756 would be taken from their deposit. This included £200 for redecoration and more than £500 for cleaning costs.

Evidence

However, one of the students gave photographic evidence proving that the apartment was left in a better condition than when they moved in. What’s more, the same student also found that only some of the promised redecoration had been carried out.

This further highlights the importance of a comprehensive inventory at the beginning of a tenancy agreement.

The Independent reports that these students also questioned charges made for removal of rubbish and mattress covers, for which Digs could not provide receipts.

Steven Harris, managing director of Digs, said on the matter: ‘We’re extremely disappointed that the deductions charged to Ed Straw and his fellow tenants led to him taking the landlord to court, and in all instances we work towards a more amicable solution. Whilst the court system is there to be used Digs hope that their tenants do not feel the need to go down this route. Having managed 8,000 tenancies in total it is the first time this has happened and we firmly believe it will be the last.’[1]

Agency forced to pay out as students win deposit case

Agency forced to pay out as students win deposit case

National Union of Students president Malia Bouattia has pledged support for a series of rent strikes across different locations of Britain. In addition, she slammed what she coined as ‘extortionate fees’ being levied on some students.

[1] https://www.lettingagenttoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2017/2/agency-hands-over-865-after-students-win-deposit-court-case

 

 

Romford Knocks Luton off the Top Buy-to-Let Locations

Published On: February 23, 2017 at 9:28 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Romford Knocks Luton off the Top Buy-to-Let Locations

Romford Knocks Luton off the Top Buy-to-Let Locations

Romford has knocked Luton off the number one spot in LendInvest’s rankings of the top buy-to-let locations in England and Wales.

The UK’s leading online property lending and investing business has released its latest quarterly research index on the top buy-to-let locations.

The LendInvest Buy-to-Let Index ranks each postcode area around England and Wales to find the top buy-to-let locations. The ranking is based on a combination of four critical metrics: Capital value growth, transaction volumes, rental yield and rent price growth.

Romford in east London has taken the top spot, climbing six places thanks to an 8% jump in rent price growth.

Northampton remains the only postcode in the top ten to be located outside the South East, while Stevenage ranked tenth overall, despite recording the highest rent price growth, at 10.2%.

The Co-Founder and CEO of LendInvest, Christian Faes, comments: “Consistency is clear here: suburban parts of the South East of England continue to offer the best opportunities for investors, while inner London continues to underperform.

“The absence of a large shake-up in the top ten buy-to-let postcodes this quarter shows some stability in the market following a year of market-moving uncertainty and geopolitical shocks. This can only be good news for property professionals; there is nothing to wait for to start investing, renovating and building.”

He advises: “Landlords and investors must remember that considering rental yield isn’t enough; it’s critical to find a property that impresses across all metrics. In the quarter ahead, we’ll be watching closely a number of areas that could edge towards the top ten, like Bristol (ranked 15th), Milton Keynes (16th) and Manchester (21st).”

The top buy-to-let locations 

Position

Location Average rental yield Average capital gain Average rent price growth

Transaction volume growth

1 Romford 5.24% 16.55% 8.33% -7.84%
2 Luton 4.73% 15.19% 7.94% -6.06%
3 Dartford 4.74% 17.75% 6.25% -12.44%
4 Rochester 4.71% 13.96% 6.94% -7.09%
5 Watford 4.24% 17.17% 6.36% -15.78%
6 Enfield 4.60% 16.97% 4.53% -11.97%
7 Southend-on-Sea 4.50% 14.41% 5.95% -9.40%
8 Northampton 4.77% 8.11% 8.33% 0.85%
9 Colchester 4.44% 12.21% 4.38% -2.61%
10 Stevenage 4.06% 9.39% 10.20% -11.00%

The worst buy-to-let locations 

Position

Location Average rental yield Average capital gain Average rent price growth

Transaction volume growth

1 Galashiels 3.80% -9.57% 0.91% 1.00%
2 Cleveland 4.66% 1.24% -3.51% -11.26%
3 Northwest London 3.82% 5.40% -5.03% -13.01%
4 Carlisle 4.16% 0.61% 0.00% -14.23%
5 Western central London 3.46% 1.50% 4.44% -27.90%
6 Llandrindod Wells 3.49% -1.20% -1.24% 0.57%
7 Hull 4.64% 5.61% -3.51% -11.39%
8 Newcastle upon Tyne 4.74% 1.53% 0.00% -9.30%
9 Llandudno 4.73% 0.77% 0.00% -4.99%
10 Swansea 4.67% 1.24% 0.00% -5.76%

 

Demand from investors leads to rise in bridging loans

Published On: February 22, 2017 at 2:20 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,,

Demand for short term loans continued to rise in the last quarter of last year, with more property investors turning to bridging finance in order to fund their property acquisitions.

Figures compiled by The Association of Short Term Lenders from its members show that the value of bridging loans written rose by 26% in the final quarter of 2016, in comparison to Q3.

The year as a whole saw more modest growth, with value of loans written 9.4% greater in 2016 than they were in 2015. Lending in the year totalled £2.83bn, up from £2.59bn in 2015.

Finance

Benson Hersch, CEO of the ASTL, noted: ‘While lending by ASTL members didn’t quite hit £3bn, there are a number of bridging loans that fall under the radar, made by lenders that many people do not know exist, as well as those lenders who are not members, so the actual size of the bridging market is far larger.’[1]

The speedy nature of bridging finance is a main reason for its continued use. Unlike mainstream lenders, which have been wary of increasing short-term and commercial lending after the recession, a bridging lender can provide a real time solution to a funding gap. It does this by making funds available to acquire property in just 24 hours.

As such, investors chose short-term finance in order to avoid delays with their long-term mortgage, which could see a possible lucrative investment opportunity missed.

Demand from investors leads to rise in bridging loans

Demand from investors leads to rise in bridging loans

Increases

Continuing, Hersh said: ‘After a dip in volumes almost across the board in Q3 last year following the referendum, the size of the increase both in the quarter and across the year has overshot even my most optimistic expectations.’[1]

‘I do expect volumes to rise again in the first quarter of this year, however I expect the percentage increase to be lower compared to Q4, as this quarter’s figures very much contrast with the Brexit blues that affected people looking for bridging loans between July and September last year,’ he added.[1]

[1] https://www.propertyinvestortoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2016/5/lenders-helping-investors-bridge-the-finance-gap

Short-Term Lettings Industry Vows to Stop Landlords Turning Homes into Hotels

Published On: February 22, 2017 at 11:15 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

The short-term lettings industry, which includes Airbnb, joined local authorities and community groups at City Hall yesterday to discuss growing concerns about landlords turning homes into hotels.

Short-Term Lettings Industry Vows to Stop Landlords Turning Homes into Hotels

Short-Term Lettings Industry Vows to Stop Landlords Turning Homes into Hotels

Around a quarter of London homes listed on Airbnb are believed to have been let for more than 90 days last year – many illegally and in breach of an act designed to prevent landlords turning much-needed housing into what have been described as hotels by Labour’s London Assembly housing spokesperson, Tom Copley AM.

According to Airbnb, 4,938 of its entire London home listings – 23% of the total – were let for three months or more last year, despite a law requiring anyone doing so to apply for planning consent.

But the firm is among those that yesterday reaffirmed its commitment to enforcing the 90-day limit during a meeting hosted by Tom Copley AM, which focused on the need to stop landlords letting their properties beyond the limit set by the Government.

Speaking after the meeting, Copley said that there is “clear consensus over the need to collaborate to stop short-term lettings sites being abused by professional landlords”.

Guidance issued by the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) in 2015 removed the need for planning permission to rent out a room or property as temporary accommodation for less than 90 days per year. While the 90-day limit remains in place, local authorities say it is difficult to enforce.

Copley continued: “We know that some landlords are essentially transforming long-term homes into hotels without planning permission. This meeting showed that there is clear consensus over the need to collaborate to stop short-term lettings sites being abused by professional landlords.

“Local authorities just don’t have the resources they need to enforce the 90-day limit and so it falls to providers to step in. It’s hugely welcome that Airbnb have stuck their heads above the parapet. We need others in the industry to now follow suit and to work together on enforcing the 90-day limit, including sharing data with boroughs where necessary.”

He said: “There is no disputing the many economic benefits to Londoners of tourism that Airbnb and their counterparts create. We must ensure the costs don’t outweigh the benefits, by preventing commercial landlords from taking advantage of the system and putting even more pressure on our housing supply.

“It’s also crucial that hotels and the hospitality sector don’t face unfair competition from professional landlords setting up as hotels by the back door, avoiding taxes and regulations.”

He added: “Yesterday’s meeting was a positive discussion about the need to ensure hosts cannot break the law by letting out properties short-term for more than 90 days per year. However, effective enforcement hinges upon effective legislation from Government, and we need them round the table for any future discussion. I look forward to continuing this work with platforms, boroughs, community groups, the GLA and central Government to ensure short-term lettings are effectively regulated.”

Importance of inventories highlighted by AIIC

Published On: February 22, 2017 at 10:30 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,,

The Association of Independent Inventory Clerks has moved to further underline the importance of professional inventories.

In light of the host of tax changes, the AIIC says inventories can save landlords money at an expensive time for investors.

Costly

From April, mortgage interest tax relief for landlords is to be phased out and with letting agents’ fees to be banned in 2018, the next two years could be extremely costly for landlords.

Chair of the AIIC, Patricia Barber, noted: ‘ It’s clear that while the private rental sector remains a strong investment option-with high tenant demand and the opportunity to generate strong yields-Government intervention in recent years has made the prospect of being a landlord more expensive.’[1]

Barber stresses this is why it is so important that landlords ensure they are covered when it comes to damage to their property caused by tenants.

In addition, she reminds landlords and agents acting on behalf of them that an inventory is vital in confirming the condition of a property at the conclusion of a tenancy. This will make it clear if any deposit deductions will have to be made.

Importance of inventories highlighted by AIIC

Importance of inventories highlighted by AIIC

Difficulties

Those without an inventory at their disposal at the end of a tenancy will find it difficult to claim back funds should there be any damages or lost items.

Concluding, Barber said: ‘During a period when letting property is becoming more complicated, not providing an inventory could prove damaging to the landlord’s investment.’[1]

[1] https://www.lettingagenttoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2017/2/fees-ban-highlights-need-for-professional-inventories–claim