Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Just 2.3% of Landlords have made Voluntary Disclosures to HMRC under Scheme

Published On: March 18, 2019 at 11:00 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,

Just 2.3% of landlords targeted by HM Revenue & Customs’ (HMRC’s) Let Property Campaign have voluntarily disclosed their taxes under the scheme, according to new data obtained by accountancy firm Saffery Champness through a Freedom of Information request. 

In its original announcement for the campaign in 2013, the Government estimated that up to 1.5m landlords had underpaid or failed to pay up to £500m in tax between 2009-10.

Those originally targeted included landlords who own more than one property, specialist investors who let to students, those with holiday lets, and landlords of Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs).

In the five years since the campaign began, 35,099 individuals have made voluntary disclosures to HMRC, which is just 2.3% of the landlords originally identified. Meanwhile, of the estimated £500m in underpaid taxes, the campaign has so far recovered approximately 17.1% (£85m) of that overall amount.

The Freedom of Information request also revealed that the vast majority of reasons given for disclosures was due to either a ‘failure to notify HMRC’ or ‘taken reasonable care’.

James Hender, the Head of Private Wealth at Saffery Champness, says: “From the outset, the Let Property Campaign was always looking much more widely than just traditional landlords. It also targets those who may have become accidental landlords – such as those with holiday lets or multiple occupations.

HM Revenue & Customs sign incised into the wall outside their headquarters in Whitehall, City of Westminster, London

“The tax system is becoming more complex and the burden is shifting further towards the taxpayer: this inevitably means individual mistakes and misunderstanding can happen. Looking at the data from the Freedom of Information request, of the large number of taxpayers who stated that they had either failed to notify HMRC of their original liabilities or hadn’t taken reasonable care, many would likely have been unaware that they owed anything at all.”

He continues: “According to HMRC’s estimates, there are clearly many more landlords who have additional tax to pay, but have yet to come forward.  If this is the case, then these people would be well advised to contact the taxman sooner rather than later. HMRC have been tightening the net on non-compliance and there are increasingly few opportunities for taxpayers to mitigate the risk of an investigation. This campaign is one of the few that remains open, but, with the Common Reporting Standard online and the Failure to Correct penalty system in place (both of which will affect owners of properties overseas), it is likely to remain that way for only so long.”

Lucy Brennan, a Partner at the firm, adds: “We are picking up signals from the Treasury that their long-term forecasting for tax revenues shows that some of the biggest money spinners for the last century, including tobacco, alcohol and fuel duty, are due to decline, due to changing lifestyle habits.

“There seems to be a pattern emerging of HMRC targeting other sources of tax revenues, with property being an asset that they could look to levy additional taxes on. This is already in motion, with a raft of tax changes set to hit second home owners and accidental landlords over the next year or so.”

She concludes: “You only need to look at countries such as France and the US to see that, in comparison, UK property is a relatively lightly taxed asset. The difficulty with bringing in new property taxes is that it is political dynamite and any significant reform could provoke a backlash from property owners of all stripes.”

Chancellor’s Latest Housing Plans “Don’t Go Far Enough”

Published On: March 18, 2019 at 10:30 am

Author:

Categories: Law News

Tags: ,,

Last week (Wednesday 13th March), Chancellor Philip Hammond delivered the Spring Statement 2019, in which he announced his latest housing plans for the UK market. 

Despite Hammond’s claims that the Government is “determined to fix the broken housing market”, property expert Phil Spencer insists that the latest housing plans “do not go far enough”.

The Government reiterated that it is committed to building more homes in the right places, in order to unlock productivity growth and make housing more affordable. 

In the Autumn Budget 2017, it set out a comprehensive package of new policies to raise housing supply by the end of this Parliament to its highest level since 1970 – on track to reach an average of 300,000 per year. 

The latest housing plans contained within the Spring Statement set out further steps to deliver this ambition:

  • Through the Affordable Homes Guarantee Scheme, the Government will commit up to £3 billion of borrowing by housing associations in England to support delivery of around 30,000 affordable homes.
  • £717m from the £5.5 billion Housing Infrastructure Fund will unlock up to 37,000 homes at sites including Old Oak Common in London, the Oxford-Cambridge Arc and Cheshire.
  • Further progress was made on delivering growth in the Oxford-Cambridge Arc, including £445m from the Housing Infrastructure Fund to unlock over 22,000 homes, and a joint declaration with local partners, affirming the Government’s shared vision for the Arc.
  • £260m for the Borderlands Growth Deal, which, on top of the £102m announced recently for Carlisle from the Housing Infrastructure Fund, means up to £362m UK Government funding into the Borderlands area.
Chancellor’s Latest Housing Plans “Don’t Go Far Enough”

Spencer, who is the Co-Founder of Move iQ, reacts to the latest housing plans: “Any boon to Britain’s chronic housing shortage is, of course, not to be sniffed at — but the Chancellor’s plans simply do not go far enough.

“Britain needs a long-term, apolitical and impartial plan to build the homes we so desperately need, and not short-term sound bites to keep prospective voters happy.”

He believes: “Sorting out Britain’s housing crisis will not be a quick-fix; and certainly won’t be accomplished over any one Government’s time in power. 

“It’s time that housing experts were brought into the process of developing a strategic housebuilding plan — one that can’t be with tinkered with for the purpose of gaining votes every time a general election is on the horizon.”

The Managing Director of online letting agent MakeUrMove, Alexandra Morris, believes that there’s a wider issue to address: “We welcome the recognition that something needs to be done about the housing market, but it isn’t enough. Society is broken on many levels and housing is but one part of that.

“A strategic approach to infrastructure on a national level is absolutely required to help understand the requirements across the UK. The outcome would hopefully lead to tailored solutions regionally, which identifies the needs on a local level and goes further on the provision of resources to support local authorities in delivering what is needed to support their communities.”

She argues: “We need a higher target for the build of affordable and social housing. We also need to understand if existing schemes are actually delivering this. The build to rent sector is far too centralised, and the effect has been to push up inner city pricing across both sales and lettings. It hasn’t helped vulnerable people in need of quality housing get what they need.”

Morris adds: “Smaller landlords running good quality portfolios are in need of support. Encouragement to grow this sector should also be considered.” 

What Difference have the HMO and EPC Changes Made?

Published On: March 18, 2019 at 10:00 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

By Ian Boden, the Sales Director of LendInvest

Every year, it seems that landlords and property investors have new pieces of legislation to get their heads around, and 2018 was certainly no exception.

Back in April of last year, the rules around Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) were adjusted to make it illegal for landlords to rent out properties that had an F or G rating for energy efficiency in new tenancies.

Just a few months later, we also had the extension of licensing for HMO properties. Previously, homes only required a licence if they were occupied by five or more individuals and the property was over at least three storeys. However, the property size clause was removed, meaning any HMO with five occupants needs a licence.

In addition, new rules covering the minimum sizes of any bedrooms were introduced.

Why these changes matter

LendInvest welcomed both the EPC and HMO licence changes, for the simple reason that both will lead to the raising of standards within the rental market. There is no reason for tenants to have to get by in cold, non-energy efficient homes, nor should they be stuck in overly cramped, poor-quality HMOs. The private rental sector plays a key part in providing for national housing needs, and it can only properly fulfil this function by operating responsibly and professionally.

While it may have been difficult for some landlords to adjust to the ever-shifting requirements they face, the truth is that these sorts of changes will ensure that the properties available to tenants in the future are of a much higher quality, and encourage landlords to treat their rental properties in a more professional manner.

What Difference have the HMO and EPC Changes Made?

The impact so far

The EPC changes may have had a somewhat limited impact thus far, simply because they only apply to new tenancies. This is being extended to all tenancies from 2023, however, so the full impact is really still to come.

There is some evidence that increasing numbers of properties that you might class as doer-uppers are going onto the market because the owner is a landlord of a property that doesn’t meet the EPC requirements – opting to sell up rather than do up.

With the adjustments to the HMO requirements, we have already seen a host of fines levied by local authorities, with those penalties running into the tens of thousands in some cases. 

As such, these legislation changes may not simply drive up standards among rental properties, but also push out some of those non-professional landlords for whom property was simply a lucrative sideline.

It’s no secret that the dinner party landlord, who speculated on property investment during the boom years, has been turned off by various regulatory and taxation changes in recent years, such as the stripping back of tax relief and the additional Stamp Duty charges on second homes. 

The EPC and HMO requirements will simply continue this trend, leading to a rental market dominated by professional landlords who see property as their sole business.

Local authorities need more help

There is no doubt that these legislative changes are aimed at increasing the professionalism of the rental sector, delivering a higher quality of property for tenants across the country, and that’s an attitude that LendInvest strongly supports.

But, if they are to deliver lasting change, legislation is not enough. Local authorities need to be provided with adequate resources to ensure they are able to properly monitor the HMO situation in their area and ensure that requirements are being met.

There are some doubts that this will happen, though. A month after the new rules were introduced, a landlord insurance provider submitted Freedom of Information requests to a host of local authorities in densely populated areas. 

It found that as many as two-thirds of authorities had no idea how many unlicensed HMOs were operating in the area, while a third were unsure how many properties now fell within the scope of the legislation and so required a licence. 

While the Government has promised a £2m fund for councils to use on enforcement work, there is a danger that this will be spread so thinly across England that it will really make very little difference to already stretched local authority teams.

Clearly more needs to be done. If we are to drive up standards in the rental market, then it’s not acceptable for HMO enforcement to be subject to effectively a postcode lottery.

Brokers Report Strong Levels of First Time Buyers Completing

Published On: March 18, 2019 at 9:00 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,

The number of first time buyers completing on mortgages through brokers remained strong at the end of 2018, according to the Intermediary Mortgage Lenders Association (IMLA).

The trade body reports that 89% of offers to first time buyers in the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2018 ended up completing. This was up from 81% in Q3 and is the highest rate for three years.

As well as strong first time buyer levels, mortgage intermediaries also saw stronger completion rates across the board in Q4 2018.

Overall completions were up by five percentage points on the previous quarter, to 87%, which is the highest overall completion rate recorded by the IMLA.

The organisation predicts that mortgage lending via intermediaries will rise to £169 billion this year, but warns that broker confidence has ebbed, with the percentage of intermediaries who claimed to be “very confident” about their own business falling from 60% to 54% at the end of 2018. 

Kate Davies, the Executive Director of the IMLA, says: “It is encouraging to see that, when an intermediary does apply for a loan on their client’s behalf, they are being accepted and completed at growing rates. Mortgages going from offers to completions are at more than three-year highs, as intermediaries and lenders continue to find solutions for clients.

“It’s significant that intermediaries are able to demonstrate such a high success rate, especially when helping first time buyers to navigate the complexities of an increasingly competitive and complex mortgage market. This is particularly true for those taking out Help to Buy equity loans, who may need even more expert guidance.”

She forecasts: “IMLA predicts that mortgage intermediaries will account for a growing share of the mortgage market this year and into 2020. These figures underline our firm belief that, during times of uncertainty, people still seek out a seasoned expert to help guide them through complex financial decisions.

“That said, even in the face of such strong evidence about brokers’ effectiveness, it’s not surprising that brokers themselves share the current general uncertainty about the future.”

Davies concludes: “But, whatever the outcome of the current Brexit negotiations, we are confident that brokers will continue to play an essential part in guiding borrowers through the market.”

First Time Buyers Borrowing More than Buy-to-Let Landlords

Published On: March 13, 2019 at 11:08 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,

More first time buyers are borrowing for home purchases than buy-to-let landlords are, according to the latest Mortgage Lenders and Administrators Statistics from the Bank of England (BoE).

The report shows that 21.2% of lending for home purchases went to first time buyers in the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2018, compared to 12.5% for buy-to-let landlords. On an annual basis, both of these figures were broadly unchanged.

However, the percentage of lending to home movers dropped by 0.9 percentage points in the 12 months to Q4, to 29.7% of gross advances. On the other hand, the share of lending for remortgage was up by 1.4 percentage points higher year-on-year, at 31.1%. 

Overall, the proportion of lending for home purchases (including home movers, first time buyers and buy-to-let landlords) was down by 1.0 percentage point, to 63.5%.

The outstanding value of all residential mortgages in Q4 2018 was £1,442 billion, which is up by 3.3% on the same quarter of the previous year.

The value of gross mortgage advances rose by 5.5% over the year, to reach £72.9 billion. Meanwhile, the value of new mortgage commitments (lending agreed to be advanced in the coming months) was £68.0 billion, which is 4.6% higher than in Q4 2017.

First Time Buyers Borrowing More than Buy-to-Let Landlords

4.4% of mortgages advanced in Q4 had loan-to-value (LTV) ratios exceeding 90%, compared to just 3.8% in the same quarter of the previous year.

The proportion of high loan-to-income (LTI) lending (loans greater than four times the value of the annual income of a single buyer, or greater than three times the annual income of joint buyers) remained at 46.9% in Q4, which is its highest value since records began in Q1 2007.

The value of outstanding balances with some arrears fell slightly in Q4, to £14.4 billion. As a proportion of total balances, it remained at 1.0%.

Shaun Church, the Director at mortgage broker Private Finance, comments on the data: “The mortgage market is playing a crucial role in helping buyers make their first step onto the property ladder, with as many as one in five mortgages advanced to first time buyers in the last quarter of 2018. Affordability and deposit criteria have long been the main sticking points for new buyers. However, with high LTI lending at its highest point since 2007, and high LTV lending continuing to grow, the industry is alleviating the primary financial obstacles faced by the next generation of homeowners.

“The fact that high LTI lending now represents almost half of overall lending should not be cause for concern. Rigorous stress testing remains in place, which ensures no borrower will be granted a loan they cannot afford in the long-term. The stress testing rates applied are much higher than the likely increase in interest rates, so, even when today’s low rate environment ends, borrowers should be able to afford higher repayments (assuming they haven’t seen a dramatic change in their circumstances).”

He adds: “As the number of product options available to first time buyers continue to grow, borrowers must shop around to choose the right product that matches their financial needs and ambitions.”

Help to Buy is Dying in London, New Report Shows

Published On: March 13, 2019 at 10:48 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,

The Government’s Help to Buy scheme appears to be dying in London, according to a new report from Project Etopia.

The modular homes provider has found that the number of properties available in the capital under Help to Buy has plummeted by 64.3% since 2017.

First time buyers sprang into action when the Government’s housing scheme was first launched in 2013, making the most of the equity loan, which, in the capital, covers up to 40% of the cost of a new build home worth up to £600,000.

However, homes available under the scheme are swiftly disappearing. The number of properties for sale under Help to Buy in London has dropped to 1,619, from 4,535 in December 2017. Houses available under the scheme have also been vanishing at an alarming rate; at the end of 2017, Help to Buy houses were extinct in a quarter of all boroughs, but that has now risen to nearly half (15 boroughs).

The borough worst affected by a shortage of Help to Buy homes is Hammersmith & Fulham, where, at the time of the study, there was just one property left – a £595,000 one-bedroom flat.

Among the boroughs with the lowest number of Help to Buy homes available, Kensington and Chelsea has three, while Westminster has four.

Housebuilding statistics appear to show that the Help to Buy drought is purely due to developers not being able to keep up with demand. The number of homes completed in London by private developers remained stable in the past 12 months, at 17,430. This was only marginally down on the 17,770 completions in the previous year.

Over the same period, the amount of homes purchased in the capital under Help to Buy rose by 23.7%, to 5,156.

In total, 20 of the 32 London boroughs have fewer than 50 Help to Buy homes for sale, compared to seven in 2017. Houses make up just 5.4% of the overall stock across the capital, declining form 13.3% of all Help to Buy properties in December 2017.

Joseph Daniels, the CEO of Project Etopia, says: “It’s all very well giving buyers a leg-up, but it’s no good if the properties aren’t there in the first place.Building rates in the capital are relatively stable, but the popularity of Help to Buy is surging, and developers just cannot keep up with demand.

“The gradual extinction of Help to Buy homes in London demonstrates that interest-free Government loans are not the answer to the housing crisis. Only rapid housebuilding on a large scale and innovative ideas, including modular construction, will prove to be a lasting antidote.”

He adds: “Families are being particularly hard hit, with houses available under Help to Buy now extinct in half of London boroughs, pushing overwhelming demand into other boroughs or forcing people out of the capital altogether.”