Posts with tag: tenants

Tenants Could Save £64 for Each Extra Commuting Minute by Moving out of London

Published On: November 29, 2018 at 9:56 am

Author:

Categories: Tenant News

Tags: ,,

Families renting homes in London could save up to £64 for each extra commuting minute by moving out of the capital, according to research by AnyVan.com.

The study has used the average price of renting a three-bedroom family home in the capital, against a similar property in a commuter town.

The cost of renting in London is particularly high, especially for families. For those who work in central London, adding just a few minutes to a commute can save hundreds of pounds each month.

So, where could you move to that gives you a similar commute time, plus a similar sized home?

Tenants Could Save £64 for Each Extra Commuting Minute by Moving out of London

Tenants Could Save £64 for Each Extra Commuting Minute by Moving out of London

Woking offered the greatest saving per minute. There are a number of rental properties close to Woking station and, with its quick train link to Waterloo, the commute time from your front door could be as little as 28 minutes. There are decent savings to be made – roughly £191 per month in comparison to living in Colliers Wood, which can have a 25-minute journey into Zone 1. This means a saving of £64 for each minute added to the commute time.

St Albans is another known commuter hotspot, with a non-stop service into the capital. Commuting from a property close to the main station to Kings Cross takes just 23 minutes, which is actually only five minutes more than if you lived up the Victoria Line in Walthamstow. This switch could see tenants save £31 per minute, with a monthly saving of £157.

The highest potential monthly saving was £589, found by moving from South Clapham to Berkhamsted. A similar saving could be gained by switching homes in southwest London, such as Gunnersbury, to Reading. If you’re looking at Reading, be sure to check out Caversham, which offers a village feel, but is just a few minutes’ walk from central Reading and the mainline station. A short walk and direct train into London will take just 31 minutes, and could save commuters £39 a minute, or £545 per month.

A lesser-known option is Haddenham, a small village close to Thame on the border of Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire. Haddenham offers a direct fast train service, which gets you into Marylebone in less than 40 minutes. This commute would add just seven minutes to your journey when compared to travelling in via the Bakerloo Line from Kenton. This switch would save £45 per minute, or £315 a month.

Other locations highlighted in the research include Bedford, against Edgware, which had a saving of £45 per minute. Seven Oaks was just four minutes longer than Tooting Bec, with a saving of £39 a minute. Kings Langley offers a commute of 29 minutes into Euston, versus West Finchley, at 22 minutes. This seven-minute difference could save tenants £41 per minute.

Angus Elphinstone, the CEO of AnyVan.com, says: “Our research highlights just how much money families who are renting in London could save by moving to a commuter town. Locations like Reading, St Albans and Woking offer rapid direct train links, and give movers an option to save money by adding just a couple of minutes to their journey time, in comparison to living in Zone 3 or 4.

“Commuter train tickets can cost upwards of £500, which might seem a bit steep for some, but, even with the additional travel costs, families can easily save £500 a month by switching London to a commuting hub.”

He adds: “Our advice before you move anywhere is: always do your homework and research the area. We’ve selected areas with available rental properties within a few minutes’ walk to the train station, as using a car park could add a further £100 per month to a commute.“

Landlords, you can use this research to inform your decisions when looking at property investments outside of the capital.

Councils are Failing Tenants and Good Landlords, the RLA Insists

Published On: November 29, 2018 at 9:00 am

Author:

Categories: Lettings News

Tags: ,,

Councils across England and Wales are failing tenants and good landlords, according to a study by the Residential Landlords Association (RLA).

Two-thirds of councils in England and Wales brought no prosecutions against private landlords in 2017/18, the research found.

Almost a fifth of councils didn’t even issue any improvement notices during this period, which order a landlord to conduct certain repairs or improvements to a property.

Following the introduction in April 2017 of new powers for councils to issue civil penalties against landlords failing to provide acceptable housing, in 2017/18, 89% of local authorities did not use these powers. Half reported that they did not even have a policy in place to use them.

Analysis of the results from 290 local authorities replying to Freedom of Information requests from the RLA’s research platform, PEARL, shows that there is no clear link between a council operating a licensing scheme for landlords and levels of enforcement.

As MPs prepare to debate the private rental sector today, the RLA is arguing that the results of its study show that tenants and good landlords are being failed by a system that is unable to root out rogue landlords.

The RLA is calling for a renewed focus on enforcing the powers already available to councils. This includes: sustainable funding for enforcement departments; using Council Tax returns to help identify landlords; and councils doing more to find and take action against criminal landlords.

David Smith, the Policy Director of the RLA, says: “These results show that, for all the publicity around bad landlords, a large part of the fault lies with councils, who are failing to use the wide range of powers they already have. Too many local authorities fall back on licensing schemes, which, as this report proves, actually achieve very little except to add to the costs of the responsible landlords who register.

“Instead of policing licensing schemes, councils need to focus on finding and taking action criminal landlords.”

It’s been a Positive Autumn for the Lettings Market, Reports Your Move

Published On: November 28, 2018 at 11:22 am

Author:

Categories: Lettings News

Tags: ,,,

It’s been a positive autumn for the lettings market, according to the latest figures in Your Move’s Rental Tracker, which covers the month of October.

The South West led the way in October, with rent prices in the region rising faster than anywhere else. The average rent rose by 4.4% in the year to October, which is well above the average for England and Wales (2.2%).

Rents were down in just two regions in October – the East of England and London.

The average rent price in England and Wales was £861 on a seasonally adjusted basis, and £934 on a non-seasonally adjusted basis.

Rent prices

The standout performer in October was the South West, where a combination of strong local economic growth and high housing demand saw rents rise faster than any other region on an annual basis. A typical rent in the region was £686 in October.

But, despite the increase, the South West is still some way behind other parts of southern England. London remains the most expensive region to rent a property, at an average price of £1,271 per month.

However, rents in the capital are falling, by an average of 0.9% in the 12 months to October.

Rent prices in the East of England dropped by an average of 0.4% over the same period, with a typical property now let for £890 per month. It is the third most expensive region to rent.

Just ahead was the South East, which was the only one of the three most expensive regions to record annual rent price growth. Rents in this region – containing many London commuter hotspots – were up by 1.6%, to hit an average of £895 in October.

It's been a Positive Autumn for the Lettings Market, Reports Your Move

It’s been a Positive Autumn for the Lettings Market, Reports Your Move

At the other end of the scale, the cheapest region to rent a property in the country was the North East. Prices here rose by 0.8% in the 12 months to October, to reach an average of £535.

Elsewhere, prices in Wales were flat compared to October 2017, with rents standing at an average of £588 a month.

Month-on-month, the North East and West Midlands saw the greatest rent rises. Both regions recorded growth of 0.4% between September and October.

The North West was not far behind, and was the strongest performer of properties along the west coast. The region recorded growth of 0.3% on a monthly basis.

The East of England was the only region to record a decline in rents between September and October.

Rental yields

Each of the ten regions included in Your Move’s index posted the same average rental yield in October as it did in September.

Landlords in northern regions once again enjoyed the highest percentage returns, with average yields much higher than in southern areas.

The average landlord in the North East saw an annual yield of 5.0% in the year to October, while, in the North West, this figure stood at 4.8%.

London recorded the lowest percentage returns, at an average of 3.2%.

Across all of England and Wales, the average rental yield was 4.3%, which was the same as in September.

Rent arrears 

Between September and October, there was a decline in the number of households in rent arrears, according to the Rental Tracker.

In a boost to tenants and landlords alike, just 8.6% of tenancies had fallen behind with their rent payments in October, which is down on the 10.1% recorded in September. It is also lower than August’s total of 9.7%.

The proportion of tenants in arrears remains well below the recent and all-time highs recorded by Your Move. The all-time high of 14.6% was seen in February 2010, while the most recent high of 13.7% was recorded in July 2017.

Martyn Alderton, the National Lettings Director of Your Move, says: “The focus of the rental market has now well and truly shifted away from London. Prices in other regions are growing much faster and offering higher percentage returns for landlords.

“The South West was the star region this month, posting faster rent growth than anywhere else.”

He goes on: “Investors in the North East and North West continued to enjoy higher percentage returns than other areas, with some areas looking at a 7.5% yield. Properties by the North West coast prove to be very popular. And, with the area ideal for those who enjoy outdoor activities such as running, biking and walking, it’s understandable why tenant demand is high and why landlords are choosing to buy here.

“All in all, there are positives across much of England and Wales, including the fact that tenant arrears are falling.”

Tenants in Camden Spending Most on Rent of any London Borough

Published On: November 28, 2018 at 9:51 am

Author:

Categories: Tenant News

Tags: ,,

Tenants in Camden are spending the highest proportion of their salaries on rent of any London boroughs, according to a new study by OnTheMarket.com.

The property portal found that, when renting a one-bedroom property in Camden, 61% (£1,944,28) of the average tenant’s salary is spent on rent. For a two-bed, this drops to 46% (£1,471,05), while a three-bed eats up 51% (£1,614,44). Four-bed homes will eat up 60% of a tenant’s rent (£1,911,65). These percentages are based on one tenant per bedroom.

The average gross salary of tenants in Camden is £3,181.17 per month.

However, the data shows that Camden does not, in fact, boast the highest average rent price in London. Instead, it is the borough where private tenants are spending the highest proportion of their wages on rent, in relation to the average salary for that specific borough.

Tenants in Camden Spending Most on Rent of any London Borough

Tenants in Camden Spending Most on Rent of any London Borough

Kingston upon Thames is the borough with the lowest percentage of earnings spent on rent across the capital. The average gross salary of a tenant in the borough is £4,352.78 per month.

When renting a one-bed property in Kingston upon Thames, the percentage spent on rent is 25% (£1,099.15), while a two-bed is 17% (£740.65). A three-bed is 15% (£648.55) and a four-bed is 14% (£627.40). This also assumes one tenant per bedroom.

Vikki Bennett, the Spokesperson for OnTheMarket.com, says: “Costs within the London rental market have been driven up in recent years, as first time buyers have battled to enter the housing market and second steppers have struggled to trade up while prices have risen.

“While it’s no surprise that cost remains the most likely primary factor when considering a new home, our analysis shows some stark variations across each borough of salary percentages being spent on rent. So, while London rents remain high across the board, considering all available options, such as moving to a nearby borough just a few miles away, can prove to have significant cost savings.”

She points out: “Hampstead, within the borough of Camden, is likely to be of high significance as to why Camden comes out with the highest percentage, due to the exceptionally high rental prices within this particular area.”

Mark Birch, the Director of Lettings at estate agent Jackson-Stops in Teddington, looks at Kingston: “Kingston upon Thames is an ancient market town located on the banks of the River Thames and nestled between London’s two largest Royal Parks. It’s an attractive place to rent for many people, offering many things such as great shopping and leafy walks in beautiful parkland. It is also cheaper than neighbouring areas, such as Richmond.

“It’s easy to see why so many commuters might choose to settle here and benefit from being outside the hubbub, while remaining close enough to connecting transport links into London.”

And Charlie Benn, the Director of Lettings at Bexley estate agent Anthony Martin, also comments: “It takes around 45 minutes to an hour to get from Bexley into central London. This is ideal for city workers, especially at a time where two-hour commutes are on the rise.

“City workers living in Bexley are in easy reach of central London, while also benefitting from the affordable rental prices.”

They add: “This makes Bexley attractive to those working in the City who want to keep a higher percentage of their salary for disposable income!

“Next year, the borough will be within an easy commute to the highly anticipated Crossrail Link (at Abbey Wood), providing even more time saving commutes.”

Will PPI Companies Start Chasing Tenancy Deposits?

Published On: November 28, 2018 at 9:00 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

As the PPI deadline looms, could these companies switch their business models to chasing tenancy deposits that weren’t properly protected?

A new study of more than 1,000 Britons in the UK’s private rental sector has uncovered a worrying lack of knowledge surrounding tenancy deposit laws and tenants’ rights when a landlord does not comply with the rules.

As such, our sister company, Just Landlords, which commissioned the research, believes that PPI companies may latch onto this naivety and chase the substantial rewards that tenants can claim when their landlord is non-compliant.

Under the Housing Act 2004, landlords in England and Wales must protect their tenants’ deposits in one of the three Government-approved schemes. If they don’t, they could be liable to pay the tenant up to three times the amount of the initial deposit, plus the full deposit amount.

Will PPI Companies Start Chasing Tenancy Deposits?

Will PPI Companies Start Chasing Tenancy Deposits?

When respondents were asked how much of the original deposit the tenant could claim for when they leave the property, if the landlord has not complied with the law, just 2% could correctly identify the right answer – three times the amount, plus the deposit. This means that a staggering 98% of those involved in the private rental sector do not understand tenants’ rights.

We remind all involved in property to read our helpful guide to understanding tenancy deposit law, and why it’s important to comply with it: https://www.landlordnews.co.uk/guides/a-landlords-guide-to-tenancy-deposits-2/

Perhaps even more worrying is the fact that, of those aged 55+, 70% thought that the maximum amount available to a tenant was the full amount, plus their deposit. This age group includes some of society’s most vulnerable renters, so they may be at risk of being taken advantage of by rogue landlords.

Landlords, too, must be aware of the law, as they could face large fines and significant payouts to their tenants if they do not comply.

Just Landlords’ study also asked respondents where a tenant’s deposit should be kept during a tenancy. The majority (66%) could not identify the correct answer – with a Government-approved deposit protection scheme – and, amongst those aged 18-24, the number of correct responses dropped to just 16%.

This should ring major alarm bells, as most 16-24-year-olds (65%) live in rental accommodation. Worryingly, they may be missing out on money that they are legally entitled to.

8% of respondents believed that the deposit was held in the landlord’s personal bank account, while almost a quarter (24%) thought that the letting agent looked after it.

Following the PPI scandal of recent years, the survey also looked at whether or not attitudes to consumer rights, particularly tenants’, had changed, and whether or not Brits are more or less likely to look into which processes should be followed.

37% said that it had not made any difference to their attitude towards their consumer rights, with just under three-quarters (74%) saying that the PPI scandal hadn’t changed their awareness when it came to reading the terms and conditions of a signed agreement.

Rose Jinks, the Spokesperson for Just Landlords, comments on the findings: “It’s shocking that so few people understand their rights when it comes to tenancy deposits, especially as more people than ever rent from a private landlord. We believe that the companies currently seeking PPI compensation for consumers may turn to unclaimed tenancy deposits when the deadline comes into force in August next year.

“Tenants may find that they could claim back three times their deposit, plus the original deposit amount, if their landlord didn’t comply with the law, while landlords could be faced with a significant bill. We urge all of those in the private rental sector to understand their rights and responsibilities surrounding tenancy deposits.”

The Challenges and Opportunities for Enforcing the Lettings Fee Ban

Published On: November 27, 2018 at 10:00 am

Author:

Categories: Tenant Fees Ban

Tags: ,,

As part of the Government’s plans to enforce the upcoming lettings fee ban, a new lead enforcement authority will be established for the private rental sector.

According to the draft Tenant Fees Bill, which is currently moving through the House of Lords, Trading Standards will be responsible for enforcing the ban, while local authorities will be able to retain money raised through fines for non-compliance.

But, as has been proven in the past, new laws are only as good as their enforcement. So, what are the challenges and opportunities for enforcing the lettings fee ban?

The challenges for enforcement 

With thousands of letting agents operating across the country, it may be difficult for authorities to fully enforce the lettings fee ban and make sure that all companies are compliant.

Enforcement of existing legislation, such as the requirement for all agents to display their fees, has been, at times, problematic.

According to research in 2017 by the National Approved Letting Scheme (NALS), 93% of local authorities had failed to issue a single financial penalty for non-compliance with compulsory fee disclosure rules.

The Challenges and Opportunities for Enforcing the Lettings Fee Ban

The Challenges and Opportunities for Enforcing the Lettings Fee Ban

Almost two-thirds of councils surveyed admitted that they did not consider displaying letting agent fees a high priority. Furthermore, a third of councils said that they hadn’t allocated staffing resources to this work in 2016/17.

At the same time, 64% of local authorities said that they were yet to assess the impact that the fees ban could have on enforcement.

The Chief Operating Officer of proptech firm PayProp UK, Neil Cobbold, says: “The extra resource of a lead enforcement authority is welcome, but policing the fees ban will continue to be a challenge.

“Consumer awareness will be a key factor. More informed tenants and landlords would be highly likely to notify the relevant authority when agents continue to charge upfront fees or do not cap tenancy deposits.”

Enforcement being taken seriously

In September, it was found that funding for the National Trading Standards Estate Agency Team (NTSEAT) has been doubled. The team, which aims to protect consumers from rogue estate agents, has had its funding raised to £500,000 per year.

Cobbold points out that increased funds for regulating the sales sector may be a sign that more money could be made available to enforce the lettings fee ban over the next few years.

Introduction of the fees ban 

The Government has stated that the fees ban will be introduced in spring 2019 at the earliest, but, since its introduction to Parliament in May 2018, there have been no further announcements regarding the date of implementation.

“This has led people to assume an April start date,” Cobbold says. “Bearing in mind that there are still several steps for the draft Bill to pass through – including a report stage, third reading and amendments stage – we need to keep an eye on the movement of the Bill.”

He continues: “However, the fact that there has been no opposition and that, currently, there are no legal instruments required once the Bill becomes an act, the Secretary of State could look to sign the act into law as soon as the process is due to complete at the end of the year.

“It has always been advised that the CMP [Client Money Protection] legislation would be implemented first (April 1st 2019), so the fee ban being introduced at some point in April 2019 still seems the most likely outcome.”

Cobbold advises: “At this stage, agents should continue to monitor the news for Government announcements and prepare their businesses accordingly.

“Companies that take a positive approach to the fees ban and look to benefit from a more efficient business model are likely to thrive in the years to come.”

We remind all property professionals that we have a dedicated page for all news relating to the tenant fees ban: https://www.landlordnews.co.uk/category/tenant-fees-ban/