Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Buy-to-Let Still Profitable in Major UK Cities

Due to the Government’s recent so-called attack on buy-to-let, you would be forgiven for believing that property investment is no longer a viable option. But if you invest in major UK cities, excluding London, it still could be…

Combined with Brexit, stricter lending criteria and an unaffordable property market, the Government’s tax changes are making buy-to-let seem like a broken market.

But investing in buy-to-let could still be a lucrative option if you choose major UK cities, explains Paul Mahoney, the Managing Director of Nova Financial, a property investment and finance advisory company.

Speaking to CityAM, Mahoney explained how the buy-to-let sector is changing:

Paul, we’ll start with the big question, is buy-to-let dead?

“Great question, and certainly a topic of hot debate at present. When considering the tax changes and higher rental coverage rates for lending, there are certainly some areas where buy-to-let property investment is becoming a lot less viable. London and the South East are the main areas that stand out, given lower rental yields that average circa 3.5% that restrict the maximum borrowings in most cases to less than 60%, so a lot more cash needs to be applied.

“And given the average property price in London is now well over £500,000, the average cash investment is well over £200,000 including costs. Due to the low yields available in these areas, properties that are leveraged at 60% loan-to-value (LTV) are barely breaking even and, therefore, landlords are exposed to interest rate rises and potential negative cash flow situations. Add to this the tax changes which will reduce the tax efficiency of an investment for anyone earning more than £50,000 if the investment is in their personal name, and you have quite a few reasons to not be investing now.”

Buy-to-Let Still Profitable in Major UK Cities

Buy-to-Let Still Profitable in Major UK Cities

Well that all sounds quite negative with regards to London. Are there other areas worth looking at?

I’m glad you asked. Many of our clients have been investing in other major UK cities such as Birmingham, Manchester and Liverpool. The most interesting trend affecting the property market currently is North Shoring, which is the movement
of employment from London to 
the North West. Net migration is strongly positive from London to the Midlands and the North West, which is being driven by strong job growth. Manchester alone has benefitted from over 60,000 new jobs since 2011, and major companies, such as Ernst & Young, Price Waterhouse Cooper and Deutsch Bank, to name a few, are contributing. This is driving strong population growth to cities such as Birmingham, Manchester and Liverpool, and changing the dynamics in a very positive way.”

That’s very interesting. I suppose the general consensus has been that London is more stable and will provide more growth – what are your thoughts on that?

Well, if we look at the changes that have occurred in Liverpool over the past 12 months, job growth year-on-year to June 2016 was 38.1% and the economy grew by 15%, which is incredible. There is also over £10 billion of infrastructure spending currently underway in central Liverpool, which is expected to create over 100,000 new jobs over the next decade. That will affect the property market in a positive way.

“Each of the cities on average have outperformed London over the past 12 months for capital growth and are providing circa double the yields, so there seems to be a swing coming about in the UK property market.”

How do the tax and lending changes affect cities like Birmingham, Manchester and Liverpool?

Given that yields generally range from 6-8%+, there is no problem with rental coverage at all and, although the tax changes may slightly impact upon some investors’ cash flow, there is a stronger buffer given the difference between interest rates and the yield is greater.

“These changes
 are therefore far less likely to impact the above mentioned cities and, in
 fact, have already started to impact them positively as the shine comes off London, and investor interest is shifting to each of these cities from both domestic and international investors.”

So where have most of your clients been investing and what returns are they getting?

The vast majority of our clients have been investing in the Liverpool and Manchester city centres renting to young professionals. With the ability to borrow up to 75% LTV at interest rates of circa 2.5% and generate yields of 7%+, the net return on investment is mostly 10%+, excluding growth.

“A fairly average growth rate of 5% per annum offers a 20% return on your deposit, as you’ve leveraged four times, so when you 
add that to cash flow, that is 30%+ per annum. This may seem very high, even too high to be true, but it is due to the borrowings which accelerate returns on your cash deposit four times.”

Is there any way that people can avoid the tax changes?

Yes, many of our clients have been investing through limited company structures or in a spouses’ names, but you should seek advice before doing either.”

UK residential property prices up by 5.1% year-on-year

Published On: March 7, 2017 at 12:55 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

Property price growth in the UK rose by 0.1% in February to reach an average of £219,949, according to the latest figures released by the Halifax.

Year-on-year, values are 5.1% greater, however this rate is down from the 5.7% seen in January. It is also the slowest year-on-year growth recorded since July 2013.

Demand/Supply Imbalance

Martin Ellis, housing economist at the Halifax, believes that prices will continue to move upwards if the current supply/demand imbalance carries on. He suggests that housing demand is being supported by an improving economy and increased employment.

Ellis noted: ‘Meanwhile, the supply of both new homes and existing properties available for sale remains low. This combination is pushing up prices.’[1]

Alex Gosling, Chief Executive Officer of online estate agents HouseSimple, noted that despite annual house price growth slowing, this could be due to the rush to purchase before Stamp Duty changes twelve months ago.

‘The continued supply shortage is still playing a significant role in price stability. The general consensus is that price growth will be low digits in 2017, but the critical Spring market often sets the tone for the rest of the year,’ Gosling observed.[1]

‘Early indicators suggest that we could see a healthy Spring as buyers as starting to make offers rather than simply window shopping and stock levels are creeping up. Also, the Chancellor may want to play a strong hand tomorrow and if he announces further changes to Stamp Duty, this could breathe new life into the market,’ he added.[1]

UK residential property prices up by 5.1% year-on-year

UK residential property prices up by 5.1% year-on-year

Price is right

A number of buyers are committed to purchasing property, but only at the right price, according to Jonathan Hopper, Managing Director of Garrington Property Finders: ‘The ongoing chronic lack of supply is a significant factor currently underpinning prices. Despite renewed focus on house building by the Government, there doesn’t appear to be a quick fix solution that will change the demand/supply imbalance any time soon, although tomorrow’s budget announcements may help make a step towards this.’[1]

‘Despite total UK home sales continuing to push up, we anticipate more sedate price growth in 2017, as rising house price to earnings ratios start to bite in parts of the country and restrict overall affordability. On the ground, there is a pervasive sense of caution. Astute vendors are increasingly prepared to reduce their asking price in exchange for the guarantee of a sale,’ he explained.[1]

Rob Weaver, director of Investments at property crowdfunding platform Property Partner, believes record low interest rates, coupled with the supply/demand imbalance, will put upwards pressure on prices.

‘If the UK is to fix its broken housing market, it needs radical solutions. There was a lukewarm reception for the recent housing white paper so all ears will now be on tomorrow’s Spring Budget in eager anticipation of any incentives to get Britain building affordable homes,’ Weaver said.[1]

[1] http://www.propertywire.com/news/uk/prices-uk-residential-market-continue-upward-trend-5-1-year-ago/

 

RLA calls for changes to tax relief proposals in Budget

Published On: March 7, 2017 at 10:32 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Tomorrow sees another important Budget announcement that is sure to have implications for the UK property market.

The Chancellor Phillip Hammond is being encouraged to use the Budget to change upcoming alterations to mortgage interest tax relief.

Tax Relief Changes

Existing rules permitting landlords to offset all of their mortgage interest against tax is being phased out from next month. The process will take until 2020/21 to complete.

Once the relief has been fully withdrawn, Section 24 will mean that landlords can only claim back basic rate of tax at 20% from their tax bill. Of course, this will impact on their rental returns.

The Residential Landlords Association has again called for changes to the proposals ahead of tomorrows Budget. The trade body is challenging the Government over suggestions that buy-to-let investors are taxed more favourably than homeowners. This claim has been highlighted as the main reason that the controversial interest relief changes have been suggested.

RLA calls for changes to tax relief proposals in Budget

RLA calls for changes to tax relief proposals in Budget

Hardships

Chairman of the RLA, Alan Ward, said: We are now weeks away from a tax change that risks investment in new homes and will cause considerable hardship for tenants. It is troubling that Ministers have not published any evidence to back up their assertions that landlords are taxed more heavily than home owners. This is no way to make policy.’[1]

‘We call on the Government to use the Budget this week to halt its planned tax changes which will do a little to provide the new homes to rent they claim to want,’ Mr Ward added.[1]

In addition, the RLA is writing to the Office for Budget Responsibility to give clarification on the extra burden on landlords in comparison to homeowners

[1] https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2017/3/government-challenged-on-tax-changes-that-will-cause-considerable-hardship-for-tenants

Should You Set Up a Limited Company for Your Buy-to-Let Business?

Published On: March 7, 2017 at 10:04 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Landlords across the country will be considering setting up a limited company for their buy-to-let businesses, in order to mitigate the forthcoming tax change – but is this a profitable option?

Portico London estate agent has put together some worked examples and has called in experts to share their thoughts on whether they believe landlords should set up a limited company to pay less tax.

Tax relief changes

Richard Blanco, a multi-property landlord, says: “According to NLA research, one in four landlords are considering setting up limited companies. This is largely because, as of April, landlords with mortgaged properties owned personally will no longer be able to get the higher rate tax relief on all of their finance costs. Within a corporate structure, however, landlords can continue to set their finance costs against rental profits.”

Currently, landlords are able to claim tax relief on their monthly mortgage interest repayments at the top level of tax that they pay of 45%. From April, however, mortgage interest tax relief is being restricted to 75%, and, by 2020/21, only basic rate tax relief will be able to be claimed, regardless of your income level. This restriction is only for individual landlords; limited companies can still benefit from the full interest deduction.

Why use a limited company?

Companies benefit from favourable tax treatment on profits.

If you hold an investment property personally, your rental income is combined with your other earnings, such as wages from your job, and then taxed as Income Tax up to 45% (depending on your tax bracket). If instead you hold a property in a limited company, your profits are liable for Corporation Tax at 20% – potentially halving your tax bill.

Of course, you’ll still pay tax on dividend when you draw profits from a company, but this is generally quite a tax-efficient method.

Worked example 

Portico asked Accounts & Legal for a worked example for a high rate taxpayer, using a £500,000 buy-to-let property with a 4% yield, a 75% loan-to-value (LTV) interest-only mortgage, and an interest rate of 3%.

Should You Set Up a Limited Company for Your Buy-to-Let Business?

Should You Set Up a Limited Company for Your Buy-to-Let Business?

As you can see on the graph, a company takes home £1,798 more cash in 2017/18 at £6,485, compared with £4,688 as an individual.

Furthermore, the tax on dividends (Dividend Tax) is only paid if the cash is withdrawn from the company. If it is retained in the company and reinvested, the company would be an extra £715 better off again than the individual in terms of value.

By 2021, however, when the individual is only receiving basic rate tax relief on mortgage interest, there’s quite a big difference in take home cash. As a company, you’ll pay Corporation Tax rather than Income Tax on the profit you’re left with after deducting all mortgage interest, which will leave you with substantially more cash after tax. And, furthermore, the rate of Corporation Tax is set to decline by a further 1% to 17% in 2020, which will widen the gap even further.

So surely incorporating is the better option?

From the examples so far, a company structure certainly seems more tax efficient.

But not everyone will benefit from holding their properties in a limited company structure – especially not those who are already only paying the basic rate of tax (20%) or those without a mortgage.

The Managing Director of Accounts & Legal, Chris Conway, says: “For landlords without another source of income or who are not high rate taxpayers, retaining the rental property personally allows them to utilise their annual tax-free personal allowance and basic rate tax bands, which may well be more tax efficient.”

If you’re thinking of selling in the near future

Incorporating your property portfolio also may not be the best decision if you are thinking of selling in the near future, as any gain will be subject to Corporation Tax when you come to sell.

The distribution of the post-tax retained profits in the limited company will then be subject to either Income Tax or Capital Gains Tax (CGT), depending on how the funds are distributed, incurring an effective total rate of tax between 42-44.7% for a high rate taxpayer. An individual, on the other hand, will only suffer CGT on disposal of an investment property of up to 28%.

You also need to consider the cost of incorporating and ensuring the ongoing compliance of the new company. This includes filing annual accounts, an annual return at Companies House, and filing Corporation Tax returns with HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC), which typically costs £500-£1,000 per annum.

The cost of buy-to-let mortgages for limited companies 

Blanco also makes a good point regarding the cost of commercial mortgages: “It’s important to remember that buy-to-let mortgage rates start from 1.59% with a £1,995 fee, and commercial rates start from 3.29% with a 1.25% fee, but are more typically close to 4%, so you would be paying considerably more interest if you incorporate.

“They are often repayment mortgages rather than interest-only too. And remember, whilst corporate structures might offer some tax benefits now, the rules can be changed at the whim of the Chancellor. You should put together a spreadsheet to calculate the difference in costs and make a decision based on actual figures and not a hunch.”

Richard has his own worked example:

“A £300,000 mortgage at 1.59% would cost £4,700 in interest per year and, at 4%, it would cost £12,000 per year. That results in £7,300 more per year. You might find that this extra cost is more than the additional tax you will pay under the new regime if you own the property personally.”

In conclusion, it depends on the individual landlord 

Though holding your properties in a limited company structure can help guarantee your monthly tax bill, it may not benefit those who are lower rate taxpayers or those with only one rental property.

A better idea may be to cut your interest costs by remortgaging and getting an up-to-date rental valuation on your property. Your lender will therefore have to recalculate your LTV, and a lower LTV ensures a better interest rate and a larger selection of lenders.

London the second most expensive city in the world to rent a property

Published On: March 7, 2017 at 9:39 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

A new study has revealed that London is the second most expensive city in which to rent a property in the world.

The English capital stands only behind San Francisco in the expense stakes, according to a new report from Barratt London.

Rising Rents

Tenants in the capital are now paying on average, half of their monthly salary to rent a one-bedroom flat. On average, the price of this kind of accommodation in London is £1,250pcm.

Despite this falling below the £2,532 seen in New York and £1,558 in Sydney, Londoners are paying more based on average salary and average rental prices. Typically, Londoners spend 45% of their wages on rent, second only to the 47% paid by those in San Francisco.

A Barratt London spokesman said: ‘Rental prices in London continue to demand too much of the occupier, to the extent of almost half of their monthly pay cheque. Renting must remain a viable option for those looking to move home, but residents might want to consider a buying market that offers plenty of incentives for first-timers.’[1]

London is the second most expensive city in which to rent in the world

London is the second most expensive city in which to rent in the world

‘The London Help to Buy scheme, for example, is helping first-time buyers get on the property ladder more affordably, with just a 5% deposit and an equity loan that is interest-free for the first five years,’ the spokesperson added.[1]

[1] https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2017/3/london-crowned-second-most-expensive-city-to-rent-in-the-world

 

Property Market Predictions for Tomorrow’s Spring Budget

Published On: March 7, 2017 at 9:14 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,

Tomorrow, Chancellor Philip Hammond will deliver his first full Spring Budget – the first since the EU referendum. So what are the property market predictions for the announcement?

As the nation waits to see what new measures will be pulled from the red briefcase, the CEO of online estate agent eMoov.co.uk, Russell Quirk, has noted that little has been talked about regarding property.

He explains: “As always, there are many predictions around what Wednesday may bring for the UK economy going forward, but, disappointingly, the current property crisis doesn’t seem to feature very heavily. It says a lot when the most traction leading up to this Budget has been gained by a petition started by a member of the UK public, not the Government themselves.

Property Market Predictions for Tomorrow's Spring Budget

Property Market Predictions for Tomorrow’s Spring Budget

“We wait in hope that Mr. Hammond is keeping his cards close to his chest and that he has something up his sleeve for UK buyers, in particular. That said, based on the initial handover of the baton from his predecessor George Osborne, it would seem the head-in-the-sand mentality remains prevalent within this Government where the UK property market is concerned.”

He adds: “As we have come to expect from politicos, much of the property flavour of Wednesday’s Budget is likely to be regurgitated announcements that they hope will continue to grab a headline or two despite being old news. It is this kind of initiative recycling that we saw in the recent Housing White Paper and is seemingly housing market de-rigueur these days.”

He looks into the different areas that may be brought up in tomorrow’s Spring Budget:

£1.5m+ market

“It is looking likely that a slight reprieve to the top end of the market where Stamp Duty tax is concerned may be the only real implementation of something new. The UK market has remained strong through testing times since the last Budget, but the high-end sector has taken a real kicking where buyer demand is concerned. Whilst the Government is making more in Stamp Duty tax on each sale, the sharp decline in transaction volumes above £1.5m have resulted in the Government actually making less money, and Mr. Hammond should adjust his housing policies based on this post-Brexit evidence.

“In light of this significant reduction in high-end transactions, there is a real danger of a trickle down issue within the market in that, if buyers of £1.5m+ homes are disincentivised, then they won’t sell to begin with. This then congests the market at the £1m bracket and so on, preventing homeowners at all stages progressing up the ladder.

“This Government is a Conservative Government and should be promoting aspiration rather than penalising it, and they must realise those that have attained the ability to buy a six-figure home are no longer the property elite in their luxury mansions, but the average family in many London areas. It is time the Chancellor understood this and the mechanics of the fragmented UK market in order to make a meaningful change to aid them.”

Stamp Duty

“What he needs to do is turn Stamp Duty on its head or eradicate it altogether. It is an archaic tax introduced to help fund a war against France many moons ago. Now that the Anglo-French relations are back on good(ish) terms, the anti-homeowner tax only heightens the mountain faced by aspiring UK buyers when trying to get on the ladder.

“Pivoting Stamp Duty so that it is paid by the seller would assist those beleaguered first time buyers, particularly those in the South East, who currently pay nearly £6,000 just for permission to jump onto the housing ladder in one of the UK’s most expensive areas.”

Right to Buy

“Finally, as already mentioned, it is likely that a fresh set of bells and whistles will be added to an existing initiative to help first time buyers, probably via the Right to Buy initiative. Anything hailing from the ‘to buy’ family seems to materialise from the best intentions, but soon fade into insignificance when it comes to making an impact.

“Help to Buy has been woeful in addressing the housing crisis and, if anything, has helped to fuel demand in a supply constricted environment, which in turn has pushed prices further out of reach from would-be buyers. Now it would seem councils are also being skittish, to say the least, when it comes to the transparency around how many homes they are actually building with Right to Buy money.”

What do you want to see in tomorrow’s Spring Budget announcement?