Posts with tag: landlord taxes

Landlords Rushing to Avoid Buy-to-Let Tax Changes

New research suggests that landlords are rushing to invest in the sector ahead of key buy-to-let tax changes.

As the 1st April Stamp Duty surcharge deadline approaches, many property investors are seeking to avoid the hike.

Landlords Rushing to Avoid Buy-to-Let Tax Changes

Landlords Rushing to Avoid Buy-to-Let Tax Changes

Meanwhile, more individual investors seem to have turned their lettings businesses into limited companies in order to be exempt from Chancellor George Osborne’s clampdown on the buy-to-let sector.

Limited companies accounted for 43% of all buy-to-let deals in January, up from 38% in December, according to specialist broker Mortgages for Business.

The total number of buy-to-let mortgage applications – by both individual investors and limited companies – increased by 27% in January from the previous month.

From 1st April, buy-to-let landlords and second homebuyers will be subject to a 3% Stamp Duty surcharge when they purchase a property worth over £40,000.

The Managing Director of Mortgages for Business, David Whittaker, explains how this is changing the market: “The increase is due to landlords trying to get as many purchases as they can completed before the Stamp Duty surcharge comes into effect on 1st April, after which I would expect transactions to return to more considered levels.”

Additionally, landlords face the forthcoming change to buy-to-let mortgage interest tax relief, which will be cut to the basic rate. However, limited companies operating lettings businesses are exempt from this change.

Whittaker comments: “Landlords have woken up to the fact that transacting via a corporate vehicle is a feasible option, and in many cases, the most prudent route going forward.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if the percentage continues to rise as landlords, especially those paying the higher tax rate, prepare for the forthcoming changes to relief on finance costs.”1

Have the planned changes affected the way you are investing in the buy-to-let sector?

1 http://www.mortgageintroducer.com/ltd-buy-to-let-takes-43-share-in-january/#.VrHGmFtLH8s

Extra 3% Stamp Duty Charge Comes Under Attack

Published On: February 1, 2016 at 12:53 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,

The extra 3% Stamp Duty charge to buyers of buy-to-let properties and second homes has come under attack, as the consultation on the proposal comes to an end.

A consumer group, the HomeOwners Alliance, says the additional tax will bring “massive unintended consequences”.

Today, the official consultation on the extra Stamp Duty ends, after just seven weeks.

If the charge is approved, it will apply from 1st April this year.

The HomeOwners Alliance calls the measure “dangerously flawed” and insists the Government goes “back to the drawing board”.

It says it supports the charge on second homes, but believes the way the Government plans to introduce the surcharge is “overly complex and flawed”.

The group is especially concerned over the surcharge’s 18-month window; those buying a new home before selling their first must pay the extra 3% Stamp Duty, then, they have an 18-month window to sell their first home in order to receive a refund.

If they do not sell within 18 months, they lose the right to a refund.

The policy would also affect people relocating, for example for work, and who might normally rent out their first home while buying in a new area. If they do this, they must pay the surcharge.

Extra 3% Stamp Duty Charge Comes Under Attack

Extra 3% Stamp Duty Charge Comes Under Attack

The Chief Executive of the HomeOwners Alliance, Paula Higgins, states: “It is great the Government is trying to use Stamp Duty to help homeowners, but they have made a real hash of it.

“The ridiculously complex way they are planning to introduce the scheme will end up harming many of the very homeowners it is meant to help, and lead to widespread confusion among homebuyers.”

She continues: “We are already being contacted by distressed homeowners who have worked out they will be caught by it and not be able to buy the home they want to.

“Rather than push ahead with a well-intentioned but dangerously flawed scheme, it should go back to the drawing board and put it right.”1

Meanwhile, the Intermediary Mortgage Lenders Association’s Peter Williams has criticised the short consultation period, which is too short by the Government’s criteria.

He believes the Government has “no view about how this tax will impact on the market as a whole, let alone the buy-to-let market.”

He says that buyers will eventually be able to absorb the extra tax, but it will push rent prices even higher.

“It doesn’t seem at all sensible,”1 he adds.

Furthermore, the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) has also voiced its concerns.

Paul Smee, the CML’s Director General, says: “There is a risk of overkill in dampening investor sentiment to the extent that the flow of available private rented property could be disrupted, without any necessarily corresponding increase in the ability of households to become homeowners.

“In addition, with around a fifth of households currently renting in the private sector, there is the perverse risk that the SDLT increase could cause landlords to charge higher rents, and so actually make it harder for tenants who want to buy to save the deposit needed to do so.

“We urge the Government at least to move away from a position where people will have to pay and then potentially claim back to one where payment is deferred, and only triggered if the buyer genuinely falls into the intended target category.”1 

For further information about landlord finances, here is a round up of forthcoming changes to buy-to-let: /contrary-to-popular-belief-buy-to-let-is-not-dead-insists-finance-firm/

1 http://www.propertyindustryeye.com/stamp-duty-surcharge-comes-under-savage-attack-ministers-told-to-turn-back/

Contrary to Popular Belief, Buy-to-Let “is Not Dead”, Insists Finance Firm

Published On: January 27, 2016 at 2:58 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,,,

Despite Government efforts to “take the shine off buy-to-let” through major tax changes for landlords, the sector is still “a very attractive investment opportunity”, according to an independent finance and property advisory firm.

Paul Mahoney, the Managing Director of Nova Financial, insists that the property sector “will remain resilient and continue to provide strong returns”, despite the changes.

Over the next few months and years, landlords will face numerous changes to the way they operate their lettings businesses, particularly financially.

Mahoney explains what’s in store for you in the near future if you’re a buy-to-let investor.

Contrary to Popular Belief, Buy-to-Let "is Not Dead", Insists Finance Firm

Contrary to Popular Belief, Buy-to-Let “is Not Dead”, Insists Finance Firm

He starts with the Wear and Tear Allowance: “As of 1st April 2016, furnishings will no longer be depreciated at a flat rate of 10% per annum. However, a positive change is that replacements of furniture will be deducted against the income of the investment for that year.”

Additionally, many landlords will see reductions in mortgage interest tax relief. Mahoney says: “From 2017 to 2020, the ability to offset mortgage interest against the income of the investment at the landlord’s own marginal tax rate will be reduced to the basic rate.

“This will be phased in using proportions of the landlord’s tax rate versus the basic rate as follows: 2017 = 75%/25%; 2018 = 50%/50%; 2019 = 25%/75%; and in 2020, all mortgage interested will be deductible at the basic rate of 20%. There are solutions to this scenario for those that may be negatively affected.”

He continues: “Lastly, as of 1st April 2016, there will be a 3% Stamp Duty premium for second homes and buy-to-let properties.”

Mahoney believes that the measures were proposed in order to crack down on the sector. He states: “The Government is trying to take the shine off buy-to-let, which has been, and will remain, a very attractive investment opportunity.

“They are using the proceeds to fund first time buyer incentives, which will have a positive impact upon the property market overall.”

But he insists: “Potential investors and current landlords need to be aware of these changes, how they relate to their investments and therefore account for them in making decisions moving forward. The key to doing this right is to seek professional advice.”

And while some landlords may be contemplating leaving the sector, Mahoney thinks the market is robust enough to handle the changes.

“These changes may negatively affect the sentiment of buy-to-let in the minds of some, but given the long-term nature of property and the fact that prices do not tend to move up and down quickly, like they do in stocks, the property market will remain resilient and continue to provide strong returns,” he claims.

“The buy-to-let sector is certainly still an attractive investment,” he maintains. “Contrary to what many journalists are saying, buy-to-let is not dead.”

However, Mahoney does acknowledge that landlords will see changes to their personal finances: “There will undoubtedly be some landlords that currently hold portfolios that are in a post-tax positive cash flow position, that will potentially be pushed into a negative cash flow position following the reduction in the ability to offset mortgage interest at their own marginal tax rate.

“These landlords may need to downsize their portfolios and rethink their strategy moving forward, but there are options.”

He reassures investors: “This is by no means the majority of landlords though, and the simple law of economics will prevail in property; when there is a lack of supply of housing and a growing demand for housing, prices in general will increase, both from a rental and capital appreciation perspective.”

Mahoney offers his advice to investors: “So when investing in areas where there are very strong reasons for people to live, such as employment, infrastructure, facilities and amenities, strong socio-economic levels and low vacancy rates, and where land is a limited commodity, you can have confidence in positive outcomes.”

He concludes: “The old cliché of property doubling every ten years no matter where you buy may be over, but by selecting very carefully, ideally with the help of an independent advisor, great opportunities exist.”

For all of the latest buy-to-let updates and landlord advice, remember to check LandlordNews.co.uk.

Mark Carney Expresses Yet More Buy-to-Let Concerns

Published On: January 27, 2016 at 9:24 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

The Governor of the Bank of England (BoE), Mark Carney, has yet again expressed concern over the boom in the buy-to-let market.

Mark Carney Expresses Yet More Buy-to-Let Concerns

Mark Carney Expresses Yet More Buy-to-Let Concerns

He reports that further analysis of the sector has begun, in response to the growth in loans to private landlords.

Responding to questions from MPs about possible risks to the economy, Carney said: “We think developments in the buy-to-let market have warranted heightened scrutiny and have done so for some time.

“As a general rule, any time you see a very sharp and sustained increase in activity in one area… it at least bears heightened scrutiny.”

Data from the BoE reveals that lending to landlords has surged from 8.8% of all new loans eight years ago to 14.5% last year.

In its December financial stability report, the Bank warned that its Financial Policy Committee (FPC) “stands ready to take action if necessary”.

Carney then told the Treasury Select Committee that the Bank would study the impact of changes to landlord taxes proposed by George Osborne.

“We want to assess the implications of those in assessing the overall implications for stability of developments in buy-to-let,”1 he stated.

From 1st April, landlords will see a reduction in mortgage interest tax relief, a change to the Wear and Tear Allowance, and a 3% extra Stamp Duty charge on investment properties. Find out more about the financial changes here: /landlords-and-agents-warned-that-buy-to-let-mortgages-could-crash/

An external member of the FPC, Martin Taylor, reinforced Carney’s statement: “We are expressing mild concern about buy-to-let.”1

Carney also told MPs that he will decide by the end of this year whether to extend his time as the Bank’s Governor.

1 http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/bank-boss-alarm-at-buy-to-let-housing-boom-a3165351.html

 

RLA Seeks Legal Advice on Challenging Osborne’s Tax Changes for Landlords

Published On: January 20, 2016 at 9:46 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,,

The Residential Landlords Association (RLA) is seeking legal advice on whether to challenge Chancellor George Osborne’s proposed tax changes for landlords.

In the summer Budget last year, Osborne announced plans to cut mortgage interest tax relief for buy-to-let investors.

The change will mean that landlords will be taxed on turnover, not profit, and targets smaller investors.

RLA Seeks Legal Advice on Challenging Osborne's Tax Changes for Landlords

RLA Seeks Legal Advice on Challenging Osborne’s Tax Changes for Landlords

The RLA is taking advice on whether the change will breach the Human Rights Act and EU law on free movement of capital.

Separately, two landlords have crowdfunded to fund a judicial review. Read more: /angry-landlords-hope-to-tackle-george-osborne/

The RLA also believes that the Government’s policies are encouraging overseas property investors.

The additional 3% Stamp Duty charge for buy-to-let landlords and second homebuyers, announced in the Autumn Statement, will, similarly to the change on mortgage interest tax relief, be imposed on smaller landlords.

Landlords with smaller portfolios will be subject to the extra tax, while those buying 15 or more properties in one transaction will be exempt.

The RLA says that this will favour larger investors, “many of whom are likely to be from overseas”.

The Chairman of the RLA, Alan Ward, comments: “It is astonishing that a Conservative Chancellor is leaving the way open for foreign investors and cutting opportunities for individual UK landlords.

“This additional assault on private landlords coming on top of changes to the taxation of rental income will only lead to reduced supply and higher rents.”

He continues: “The Chancellor’s planned changes to Stamp Duty came as a bolt out of the blue. Regardless of the Government’s plans for homeownership, demand for rented housing is only set to increase.

“The Government needs to understand that not everyone will be able to afford to buy a house or indeed want to, even if more houses are built. Its whole policy towards the private rented sector needs to change. If it does not, it will only make the housing crisis worse.”1

The Chair of the Treasury Select Committee asked the Chancellor yesterday whether the Stamp Duty charge would aid or hinder mobility in the jobs market.

Osborne responded: “I think that it will help to promote homeownership, because it will mean that there is a more level playing field between an owner-occupier who wants to buy a house, a first time buying family and a buy-to-let landlord.

“There is nothing wrong with people investing in property, but there should be a level playing field so that we reverse the decline in homeownership in our country.”2 

1 http://news.rla.org.uk/government-discrtment-in-housing/

2 http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201516/cmhansrd/cm160119/debtext/160119-0001.htm#16011944000005

Buy-to-Let Tax Changes will Push Rents Up

Published On: November 26, 2015 at 1:10 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,

Buy-to-Let Tax Changes will Push Rents Up

Buy-to-Let Tax Changes will Push Rents Up

Over two thirds of landlords believe that changes to buy-to-let mortgage interest tax relief will cause rents to rise, according to a survey by the Deposit Protection Service (DPS).

In the summer Budget, Chancellor George Osborne revealed plans to cut the amount of tax relief available for interest on buy-to-let mortgages.

The study, of 4,480 landlords, found that 69% believe the changes will push rents up, with more than a third stating that they are considering leaving the private rental sector. 35% said they might sell their rental properties.

Managing Director of the TDS, Julian Foster, comments on the findings: “Many landlords are currently facing a double-whammy of tax changes that could lead to increased rent for tenants – forcing them to sell or leave the rental market.

“Many landlords are small businessmen and women or accidental landlords, and taxation increases can affect their livelihoods and financial wellbeing.

“With many commentators predicting an interest rate rise next year, landlords are facing a series of financial challenges over the next few years.”1 

A future interest rate rise is also likely to have an impact on landlords’ finances, with 33% of respondents saying that they would pass on these costs to their tenants.

Around two thirds (62%) of landlords also said that they would be worse off due to changes to wear and tear tax relief.

From April next year, the automatic 10% tax break for wear and tear will be cut and replaced with tax deductions for the actual cost of replacing or repairing a property’s contents.

Do you agree with the findings of the survey?

1 https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2015/11/landlord-tax-changes-will-lead-to-rent-increases-says-survey