Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Over £300,000 Worth of Tenancy Deposits Stolen in Q1 2017

Published On: April 18, 2017 at 9:19 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

The recent conviction of a letting agent who stole £15,000 worth of tenancy deposits has taken the total value of deposits that are known to be stolen in the first quarter (Q1) of 2017 to £310,000.

Over £300,000 Worth of Tenancy Deposits Stolen in Q1 2017

Over £300,000 Worth of Tenancy Deposits Stolen in Q1 2017

The Founder and CEO of Keep It Simple Group (KIS), Ajay Jagota, has taken this opportunity to campaign against deposits in the private rental sector.

Thirunga Damayantharan, a Croydon-based letting agent, was sentenced to 19 months in prison last month, after being found guilty of stealing a number of tenancy deposits over a six-year period.

Jagota has long been campaigning for an official Government response to a series of crimes and misdemeanours in the tenancy deposit industry, so it is no surprise that he has welcomed the news that the Government’s consultation into the letting agent fee ban will also consider reforming the way tenancy deposits are paid.

Jagota believes that a more effective way to improve the private rental sector would be for monetary deposits to be scrapped.

His firm KIS was the first letting agent to abolish monetary tenancy deposits, replacing them with a one-of-a-kind insurance policy.

Jagota explains his stance: “The Government’s announcement that deposit reform will form part of the letting agent fees ban consultation led to the usual flurry of outrage from the usual suspects, but the industry needs to accept that change is coming.

“It’s absolutely true that deposits are a financial burden on renters in need of minimising, and it’s in the letting industry’s interest as much as anybody else’s that they are not only minimized, but eliminated altogether. We exist to help landlords find and keep good tenants!”

He continues: “No one is saying that asset protection for landlords isn’t essential – we only look to research this week claiming that a third of tenants wouldn’t own up to damaging their rented property – but there are better ways of doing it, and replacing cash deposits with insurance policies is one.

“I can already see a path to a place where it costs agents money whenever they take a cash deposit. The chair of one of the tenancy deposit schemes seemed to be hinting in a recent interview that as ongoing low interest rates are making it harder to operate, he wants to start charging for his services. You might think that will never happen, but a lot of people thought that a letting agent fee ban would never happen.”

Jagota insists: “Whether by legislation or technology, the sector is going to change. It is time to recognise the sector’s associations who represent it have a poor track record of lobbying Government, and it is now time to embrace any opportunities from the forthcoming changes.”

One in Five Rental Properties now Owned by Company Landlord

Published On: April 18, 2017 at 8:18 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,,

The proportion of rental properties owned by a company landlord reached 20% in the first quarter (Q1) of 2017 – the highest level since records began in 2010, according to research by Countrywide.

The number of homes owned by a company landlord has been steadily rising since 2013, but Q1 2017 recorded the greatest annual jump, of 4%.

One in Five Rental Properties now Owned by Company Landlord

One in Five Rental Properties now Owned by Company Landlord

Changes to buy-to-let tax relief, introduced earlier this month, may be behind the rise, believes Countrywide.

From 6th April 2017, the amount of tax relief that buy-to-let landlords can claim on finance costs, such as mortgage interest, is being reduced gradually to the basic rate of Income Tax.

The changes make it more tax efficient for some landlords to own their portfolios through a limited company, rather than hold as a personal asset.

Rental properties in London are most likely to be owned by a company landlord, with 27% of all homes let in the capital owned in this structure – the largest proportion in the UK.

Company landlord properties drive both the top and bottom of the rental market, with the most and least expensive homes likely to be owned by a company landlord.

Over the past year, a quarter of homes let by a company landlord cost less than £500 per month. Meanwhile, almost one in ten homes (9%) costing between £1,500 and £2,000 per month were owned by a company landlord, compared to 6% owned by individual investors.

In separate research, Countrywide found that rent prices across the UK fell in March. The cost of a new let was an average of 0.3% lower than in the same month last year, marking the second consecutive monthly drop.

The average rent in the UK is now £928 per month – £3 less than in March last year. The decline in rents was driven by London, the South West and Wales, where prices fell by 0.4%, 0.2% and 6% respectively.

The Research Director of Countrywide, Johnny Morris, comments: “The number of rented homes owned through a company is on the up. The incoming tapering of mortgage tax relief is likely driving the increase. Companies are generally taxed more favourably, particularly with recent changes by Government to tax relief. So, in many cases, landlords can make cash savings by operating through a company rather than as an individual.

“Rents fell again in March, mostly driven by falls in London. Stock growth continues to outpace demand in the capital, giving tenants more negotiating power, pushing down rents. In much of the rest of the UK, rents continued to growth, although at a slower rate.”

Where Landlords can Achieve the Highest Rental Yields in the UK

Published On: April 13, 2017 at 9:44 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Some buy-to-let landlords are preparing themselves for dwindling profits over the next few years, as a result of the Government’s mortgage interest tax relief changes. But solid returns are still achievable, if you look to the locations with the highest rental yields in the UK…

Peer-to-peer lender Kuflink has assessed the average rental yield in 50 major towns and cities across the UK, finding that properties in Salford in the North West of England typically offer the highest rental yields in the UK, at an average of 7.08% in the first quarter (Q1) of the year.

Where Landlords can Achieve the Highest Rental Yields in the UK

Where Landlords can Achieve the Highest Rental Yields in the UK

This was followed by Leeds, Manchester and Coventry.

Unsurprisingly, London is among the bottom locations, given the high cost of buying property in the region. Average returns in the capital are just 3.45%. But it is Chelmsford in Essex that provides the weakest yields, at an average of just 2.89%.

Overall, rental yields in Q1 2017 remained broadly stable across the UK, with the gap between returns in the north and south closing.

The CEO of Kuflink, Tarlochan Garcha, says: “This index shows that savvy investors should look to the regions where strong rents and more affordable house prices make for fruitful investment opportunities. The Northern Powerhouse is leading the way, while London falls by the wayside, as rents fail to keep up with rocketing house prices.

“The stability of both house prices and rents is a positive sign for buy-to-let investors, proving the strength of the UK’s property market, which is able to withstand the uncertainty surrounding the UK’s exit from the EU.”

He adds: “The following few months will be the true test of the market, as Article 50 negotiations get underway.”

Are you looking for the highest rental yields in the UK? Here are the locations you should invest in:

  1. Salford, North West – 7.08%
  2. Leeds, Yorkshire – 5.96%
  3. Manchester, North West – 5.79%
  4. Coventry, West Midlands – 5.64%
  5. Belfast, Northern Ireland – 5.46%
  6. Portsmouth, South East – 4.92%
  7. Birmingham, West Midlands – 4.90%
  8. Edinburgh, Scotland – 4.88%
  9. Durham, North East – 4.85%
  10. Fife, Scotland – 4.54%

The following towns and cities provide the lowest average rental yields:

  1. Chelmsford, East of England – 2.89%
  2. Cambridge, South East – 3.17%
  3. York, Yorkshire and the Humber – 3.17%
  4. Chester, North West – 3.28%
  5. Doncaster, Yorkshire and the Humber – 3.38%
  6. Derby, East Midlands – 3.41%
  7. Wigan, North West – 3.44%
  8. Wolverhampton, West Midlands – 3.44%
  9. London – 3.45%
  10. Carlisle, North West – 3.47%

The Benefits of Buying a Property with Sitting Tenants

Published On: April 13, 2017 at 9:24 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,,

The Benefits of Buying a Property with Sitting Tenants

The Benefits of Buying a Property with Sitting Tenants

Completing an investment but not having tenants move in straight away can be very costly for landlords. But buying a property with sitting tenants is an option…

Research from Nottingham Building Society claims that 21% of buy-to-let landlords have to wait at least four months after purchasing their property to find their first tenants.

Owning a property that’s standing empty can be very expensive.

However, many investors do not consider the idea of buying a property with sitting tenants. But this option can save time and money.

If you purchase a property with sitting tenants, you can take advantage of the following benefits:

  • The tenancy agreement is already in place, meaning that you do not have to try and agree terms and conditions.
  • Less of a financial burden, as you will start receiving rental income on completion of the property.
  • No set-up costs, including finding a tenant and paying for an inventory, or drawing up a tenancy agreement.
  • Already vetted tenants, including payment history, occupation, references, how well they look after the property and which protection scheme their deposit is in.

Michael Cook, the Lettings Managing Director of Romans estate agent, comments on the benefits of buying a property with sitting tenants: “Property remains a great investment, and buying a buy-to-let property with sitting tenants means you can get an instant return on your investment. As soon as you complete the property purchase, you will begin to receive rental income and avoid any void periods.”

Landlords, remember that if you do purchase a rental property with sitting tenants, you must ensure that all of the legal requirements are in place before taking over the tenancy agreement. This includes references such as Right to Rent checks.

If these checks have not been conducted, or if the tenant’s deposit is not protected by one of the three Government-approved schemes, for example, you will be liable for penalties.

The 4 Options Available to Landlords Following Tax Relief Changes

Published On: April 13, 2017 at 8:24 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,

One week ago (6th April 2017), the amount of tax relief that landlords can claim on finance costs – including mortgage interest – began to be restricted to the basic rate of Income Tax.

If you haven’t yet considered how you’ll be affected by the tax relief changes, you must start to think about the different ways you can structure your buy-to-let business.

If you’re a higher rate taxpayer (please note that some basic rate taxpayers will be pushed up into the higher bracket), you may be particularly hard hit. However, if you do not have a mortgage or if you’re a lower rate taxpayer, you will not be affected at all.

London estate agent Portico recently attended a talk by Tony Gimple from Less Tax for Landlords, who said that, in practical terms, landlords now have four options.

If you haven’t already, here are the four options to consider:

  1. Sell up

The first option is to sell your portfolio and invest your money elsewhere, save it or spend it. Although you would have to take the Capital Gains Tax (CGT) hit and mortgage penalties, if you’re thinking of retiring anyway, this could be a good option.

However, this isn’t something that the majority of landlords will want to do right now, as, although the market is suffering a post-Brexit slump, property is still a very good investment option. When compared to other asset classes, property is definitely the best vehicle for achieving wealth.

  1. Do nothing
The 4 Options Available to Landlords Following Tax Relief Changes

The 4 Options Available to Landlords Following Tax Relief Changes

Option two is to do nothing. This will be a default decision for the majority, which is absolutely fine so long as you have explored the different options available to you and are aware of how you’ll be affected by the tax relief changes.

This option will most likely mean, however, that your tax bill is increased and your disposable income is decreased, but it will not severely affect those with only one or two properties.

  1. Incorporate

The most publicised way to beat the tax relief changes is to sell your properties to a limited company that you own.

Gimple made it quite clear that he doesn’t think full incorporation or incorporating temporarily through a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) is the best move – see the next sections for reasons why.

Likewise, he said that trusts are also not an effective solution and their use for property is far more limited than it used to be. They are over-complex, he said, especially when it comes to mortgage flexibility and Inheritance Tax mitigation, making them a bad option for landlords.

What is Section 162 incorporation relief? 

Section 162 incorporation relief is available to help negate the requirement of CGT or Stamp Duty when transferring existing personally-held investment properties into a limited company.

However, you can only claim Section 162 relief if you’re working in the business, or, as Gimple put it, dealing with tenants and toilets yourself.

The pitfalls

Nevertheless, Gimple went on to say that there are more cons than pros to incorporating. Companies are great if you’re selling the whole company, as the buyer doesn’t pay Stamp Duty on the individual assets, only on the shares, at 0.5%. If you’re disposing of individual properties, you’re still required to pay the equivalent of CGT – Corporation Tax, which is slightly lower.

A negative is that you may need your lender’s consent to use your loan account and, if they lose their lending appetite, you’ll need a new company and new lender for every new property.

The big problem with limited companies, however, is getting your money out. In fact, Gimple said it’s virtually impossible to take the money out of a company without paying tax, which often results in double taxation – Corporation Tax, Dividend Tax, Income Tax and National Insurance. And, if it’s an investment company, it will be subject to Inheritance Tax.

  1. Hybrid

The final option that Gimple gave was the hybrid structure, which he described as “truly running your portfolio as a property business, whilst at the same time reducing tax leakage to the legal minimum”.

This option involves holding your current or future investment properties through a personal ownership/LLP and limited company mix – a recognised corporate structure.

Gimple said that owning investment properties this way typically offers the most balanced solution, as it allows you to legally separate ownership from enjoyment from control, via multiple legal personalities, so as to minimise tax insofar as the law allows, and keep as much profit as legally possible. You will also not suffer the loss of mortgage interest tax relief or Wear and Tear Allowance.

Gimple took the following questions from the floor:

“If I go down the hybrid route, do I have to tell Land Registry?”

He responded: “No, because there’s no change of title. You don’t even need to tell the lenders, as there’s no fundamental breach of mortgage conditions – the lending remains in your name. We’re not using beneficial interest company trusts, it’s perfectly acceptable.”

“When it comes to LLP, how do you differentiate between distribution profit and return of capital?”

He answered: “It’s what you decide to call it. With LLPs or a partnerships generally, you’re allowed to once a year say we’ll distribute profit, or this year we’ll return capital. It’s up to you. The law allows you to call it either, just one will pay tax on it and one you won’t. Sometimes you will want to pay tax on it. Why? Because in two years’ time when I want to build that house and borrow a million and a half quid in my name, I’ve got to show a lender a SA302 to say that I can afford it and that it’s my money not my businesses.”

“Would you have to pay CGT or Stamp Duty?”

Gimple replied: “In broad terms, CGT and Stamp Duty would only arise if there were a change of title, i.e. the owner (Bill Bloggs) transfers the ownership to another legal personality (Bill Bloggs Property Holdings Limited). As in the case of hybrid arrangements, there is no change in title (Bill Bloggs still owns them), CGT and Stamp Duty events do not occur.”

What should you do? 

Unfortunately, there is not one answer for all landlords. If you have one or two properties and you’re a higher rate taxpayer, you will feel a little sting from the new tax relief changes. But, it is probably not worth getting into something complex.

If, however, you are a seasoned landlord or want to make a positive decision to run a highly tax-efficient, professional property business, then Gimple suggests starting to look at how you’re going to structure it.

Follow the advice above to make the right decision for you.

Reputation of good landlords being tarnished by the bad

Published On: April 12, 2017 at 10:28 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Local councils have called on the Government to close a legal loophole permitting landlords to covert properties into multi-units that are marketed as self-contained flats.

Many landlords do this in order to secure the maximum level of housing level of housing benefit payments, that are paid directly to landlords on behalf of tenants.

Scam

The Local Government Association (LGA), which represents over 370 councils in England and Wales, feels that the housing benefit scam is leaving some tenants to live in poor and dangerous conditions. As such, the ‘Association has called for some accommodation to be closed and for more rogue landlords to be jailed, as opposed to being fined.

Industry figures indicate that private landlords received £9.3bn in housing benefit during 2015, over double the £4.6bn in 2006.

Councillor Judith Blake, LGA Housing spokesperson, observed: ‘No landlord can act outside the law and councils will do everything in their powers to ensure tenants can live in rented properties safe in the knowledge that local authorities are there to protect them.’[1]

‘However, the reputations of all good landlords are being tarnished by the bad ones and councils are being let down by the current system. Legislation is not keeping pace with the ingenuity to exploit loopholes which need to be closed as soon as possible,’ she added.[1]

Reputation of good landlords being tarnished by the bed

Reputation of good landlords being tarnished by the bed

Powers

Continuing, Blake said: ‘Legislation needs to be more joined up to prevent some landlords taking advantage of people at the sharp end of our housing crisis. Giving councils powers to be able to build more affordable homes is likely to be more successful at meeting necessary standards than the private rental sector, and help reduce the risk of tenants falling victim to potentially tragic and preventable consequences due to unscrupulous landlords.’[1]

‘Councils won’t hesitate to take irresponsible landlords to court for blatantly failing to comply with housing laws and any tenants who suspect their landlord of criminal behaviour or who have been evicted illegally should contact the housing team at their local council,’ she concluded.[1]

[1] https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2017/4/the-reputations-of-good-landlords-being-tarnished-by-the-bad-ones-says-lga