Posts with tag: landlord tax relief

Accidental Landlords Will Suffer the Most from Budget Changes

Homeowners who become so-called accidental landlords when they are unable to sell their home could be hit hardest by George Osborne’s buy-to-let changes.

Accidental Landlords Will Suffer the Most from Budget Changes

Accidental Landlords Will Suffer the Most from Budget Changes

The Chancellor announced in the Budget that buy-to-let investors will no longer be able to claim the higher rate of tax relief on mortgage interest payments of 45%, but will now receive the standard 20%.

Additionally, the rules regarding the wear and tear allowance have been tightened, meaning that landlords can only claim on money spent rather than the annual 10% of rental income currently offered.

Head of Residential Lettings at national property consultancy Carter Jonas, Lisa Simon, says that the changes could hit some landlords with a surprising penalty.

She explains: “Many properties in London and other major centres are owned by people who let them when their careers demand they move elsewhere for a time.

“Carter Jonas has a good number of such homes on its books – appealing properties that readily find good tenants.

“They are let by people who want to return but won’t sell up and move because house price inflation would bar them from making the same trip. So they let their home to cover the mortgage and rent in another location while they are temporarily displaced.”

Simon continues: “Among these people are civil servants, who will also face a 1% cap on earnings growth, moving away from major centres to advance their careers and who ultimately will want to return home.

“They now face a shortfall in their ability to pay the mortgage without raising their rents to cover the difference. It will mean they have to rise by more than the shortfall to cover extra income tax payments.

“The loss of a write-down on furnishings and maintenance, unless they can provide invoices, means that these people will have to suffer wear and tear on appliances and fittings that don’t necessarily break during the tenancy, but from which they get a shorter useful life because the tenants have been using them.”

She concludes: “The law doesn’t change until 2017 and we still have to see the fine print. There’s time for Mr. Osborne to clear this anomaly so that only those letting more than one residential property are subject to the change.

“It may have seemed a good idea but it hasn’t been thought through sufficiently well before becoming policy.”1

1 http://www.propertyindustryeye.com/accidental-landlords-to-be-hit-worst-by-chancellors-reforms/

How Landlords Can Avoid Huge New Tax Bills

Private landlords that are facing losses due to the Government’s plans to cut tax relief on buy-to-let properties could protect their income by making their letting activity a business, experts say.

Chancellor George Osborne announced that tax relief that landlords in the top tax brackets receive on their mortgage interest payments are being reduced from 45% to 20% by April 2020.

He stated in the Budget that this was to “level the playing field” as it is “unfair” that landlords receive this benefit but owner-occupiers do not.1

How Landlords Can Avoid Huge New Tax Bills

How Landlords Can Avoid Huge New Tax Bills

Accountants PwC has analysed the proposals and found that if a private landlord transfers one or more properties to a company structure, known as incorporating a business, the total tax rate is hugely reduced.

A tax partner at PwC, Paul Emery, explains: “This is because a company is paying tax on the actual profit and therefore the rate does not fluctuate wildly. If the profit reduces, so does the tax.

“If the rental property is run privately, there is a scenario where because you no longer get full tax relief for your expenses, you can pay tax even if there is no profit. That means potentially enormous effective rates of tax.”

By 2020, when interest rates will likely be higher, the tax on a property worth £100,000 to a private landlord in a higher tax bracket, with an 85% loan-to-value (LTV) mortgage and a mortgage interest rate of 5%, would be 106%.

As a consequence, the landlord would suffer an annual loss of £100.

If the same property were run as a business, the landlord would pay a tax rate of 49.2%, and make £888.

And if mortgage rates increase further, the difference is much more evident.

If rates reach 6%, the property owner operating as a business would pay 49.2% again, but the private landlord would pay 186.7% and make an annual loss of £780, using the PwC model.

Emery continues: “Other taxes such as Stamp Duty and capital gains tax [CGT] could affect profits from a rental business, especially for a landlord with only a handful of properties.”

If the owner is a sole trader, they would pay Stamp Duty again on the “incorporation of the business” based on the cost of the property. However, if the owner is in business with a partner, they could receive some Stamp Duty relief.

Otherwise, if a sold trader or business partners own over six properties, it is categorised as a commercial property business, and they will pay just 4% Stamp Duty on the sale.

Emery adds: “The big tax difference is CGT when the company finally comes to sell and dividend the profit to the owner at 49% compared to 28% for a private landlord, but at least you would know what your effective rate of tax is, and if you are reliant on the income rather than the appreciation of price, it may be a hit worth taking.

“Although incorporating your business helps you guarantee your monthly tax bill, it is not a magic solution. Tax is only one consideration when forming a company. For example, audited accounts might need to be filed.”1

1 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/property/11731646/Buy-to-let-How-landlords-can-cut-their-shock-new-tax-bill.html?utm_campaign=Landlords%20%26%20Property&utm_content=18039099&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

 

 

Is the Buy-to-Let Boom Coming to an End?

Published On: July 13, 2015 at 2:07 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

George Osborne announced last week that higher rate tax relief on buy-to-let mortgage interest repayments will be abolished. This could cost some amateur landlords thousands of pounds per year.

This could stop potential investors buying a rental property and even force existing landlords to sell their property and seek other investment options.

So is this the end of the buy-to-let boom?

Since the first buy-to-let mortgage was introduced in 1996, property investment has beaten almost every other investment, as investors have benefitted from not only rental income, but also capital growth from increasing property prices.

They also received income tax relief of up to 45% on their mortgage interest payments, which is unavailable to residential homeowners.

Some have said that this gives investors an unfair advantage over first time buyers, which has pushed them off the property ladder.

In the first quarter (Q1) of this year, buy-to-let lending rose by around 20%, while lending to homeowners increased by only 1.6%, says Equifax Touchstone.

Research Analyst at DTZ, David Ramsden, comments: “There has been a growing trend of first time buyers being gazumped by buy-to-let landlords in much stronger financial positions.”1 

Osborne’s plan to cut the maximum buy-to-let tax relief to 20% from 2017 onwards is aimed at being fair to both landlords and first time buyers. It could also raise £665m for the Treasury in the 2020-21 tax year.

Founder of online estate agent eMoov, Russell Quirk, says that it is a bad decision for landlords: “Based on average rent, they could be up to £2,000 worse off each year.”1

Is the Buy-to-Let Boom Coming to an End?

Is the Buy-to-Let Boom Coming to an End?

Osborne has also abolished the automatic right for landlords to claim 10% of rent received on furnished properties against wear and tear costs. From April 2016, they will only be able to deduct costs that they actually incur and must supply receipts.

Older investors who bought a small number of properties to support their pension will consider this particularly unfair.

Partner at chartered accountants Blick Rothenberg, Genevieve Moore, says that the announcements in the Budget will affect ordinary workers who have saved and invested in property to boost their income.

She believes that many will leave the buy-to-let sector: “We could see a flood of buy-to-lets being sold as the squeezed middle bows out of the rental market.”1

Head of Lending at the Mortgage Advice Bureau (MAB), Brian Murphy, thinks that buy-to-let investors are being unfairly blamed for the housing crisis: “This can be remedied only be a large programme of house building.”1

Recently, the Bank of England (BoE) released its Financial Stability Report, which warned that buy-to-let is a threat as borrowers invest too much and could be forced to sell if the economy takes a downturn, which would worsen house price declines.

Others believe that buy-to-let and the property market generally will survive.

UK Head of Real Estate at EY accountants, Russell Gardner, says that reducing tax relief will only affect landlords who are in the higher rate income tax bracket: “This may marginally dampen down buy-to-let as an investment proposition for the middle classes over time, but we doubt people will sell.

“Despite the changes, buy-to-let still remains quite an attractive part of a broader investment portfolio.”1

Chief Executive at The Share Centre, Richard Stone, claims that mortgage interest tax relief has twisted investor priorities: “Many will now take a second look at other investments, such as stocks and shares.”1 

However, recent market instability will affect the appeal of equities. Chief Executive of LMS, Andy Knee, says that first time buyers have been driven out of the property market by competition from tax-subsidised landlords and should therefore welcome the changes.

He states: “They may now find securing their chosen property a little easier as a consequence.”1

Other critics believe it could be bad news for Britain’s 8.5m private tenants.

Chief Executive of MyOnlineEstateAgent.com, David Grundy, cautions that landlords could increase their rents in an attempt to recover their losses, especially those of furnished properties, while a reduction in supply would have the same effect.

He says: “Increased rents will be a major set back for tenants who are trying to save for a deposit in order to get onto the property ladder.”1

However, landlords may find the changes less damaging than initially thought.

Spokesperson for specialist lender Kensington, Alex Hammond, thinks: “Landlords should not be investing simply for the tax relief. Buy-to-let has been a massive success and should remain so.”1

The tax relief changes will be phased in gradually until they are at the basic rate in 2020-21; landlords have many years to adapt.

Furthermore, there may be a way around the changes, as they only apply to individual investors, not companies.

Head of Property Specialists Assetz For Investors, Stuart Law, says landlords can invest through a limited company instead.

In doing so, they will benefit from forthcoming cuts in corporation tax, also announced in the Budget.

Law states: “Bricks and mortar will still be seen as one of the safest and most profitable investments for years to come.”1

1 http://www.express.co.uk/finance/city/590497/Death-buy-to-let-boom-years-George-Osborne-budget

 

 

 

 

George Osborne’s Changes for Landlords Explained

Published On: July 13, 2015 at 1:02 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

In last week’s Budget, George Osborne made several announcements relating to landlords. Here’s how each of these changes will affect property investors and their businesses:

Rise in rent a room relief

Rent a room relief is provided to homeowners who rent space in their own home, usually to a lodger, as this is not restricted to single rooms.

George Osborne's Changes for Landlords Explained

George Osborne’s Changes for Landlords Explained

The property owner can choose how to be taxed on the income they receive from a lodger. They can be taxed on the amount of rent received in excess of the financial limit, or calculate the profit or loss from renting and be taxed on this instead. The relief is often the best way for someone to take in a lodger.

The amount of relief will increase from £4,250 to £7,500 from April 2016. Small B&Bs will also benefit as they can claim the relief as well, as long as the owner lives on the premises.

The rise is above inflation over the period from when the allowance was introduced in April 1992 to now. If it were increased in line with inflation, the allowance would now be £6,854.

End of wear and tear allowance

Landlords that rent out fully furnished properties can claim a tax deduction of 10% of the rent they receive each year to cover the cost of replacing furniture. This is the wear and tear allowance. They can also claim when they replace items such as crockery, utensils and linen, as and when they spend the money.

From April 2016, the wear and tear allowance will end. It will be replaced with a deduction for landlords when they actually spend the money. It is yet to be confirmed whether the deduction will apply to all expenditure, including kitchen appliances, and if it will be subject to a cap.

Landlords of partly furnished homes were stopped from claiming for the replacement of white goods in 2013. Some of these landlords now offer fully furnished properties, so will also be affected by the new changes.

Cut in tax relief on interest

Full tax relief is currently available for interest on a loan used in a property business. The funds could be used to buy a rental property, to make repairs or to finance the working capital of the business.

From April 2017, tax relief on interest in property businesses will be cut so that by 2020, tax relief will be 20%.

If a business has a low level of interest compared to the borrowings, it will not be too greatly affected. However, landlords with larger portfolios will see their business models change significantly.

 

George Osborne Says Landlords’ Profits Will be Cut

Published On: July 9, 2015 at 4:59 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Thousands of buy-to-let landlords will see their profits drop after Chancellor George Osborne announced a crackdown on mortgage interest tax relief in the Budget yesterday.

According to the Chancellor, the measure will “level the playing field for homebuyers and investors”. The amount that landlords can claim as tax relief will be set at the basic rate of tax, which is currently 20%.

The change will be introduced over a four-year period, starting April 2017. Currently, landlords can claim tax relief on monthly interest repayments at the top level of tax they pay – 45%.

A freedom for information request revealed that mortgage interest relief costs around £6.3 billion per year.

The change will affect those with a single buy-to-let property right through to professional landlords with huge portfolios.

Some experts believe this move could force landlords to push rents up to compensate for their losses, which would greatly disadvantage tenants.

However, it could benefit first time buyers, who compete with landlords for property. The housing market is currently suffering a case of demand outstripping supply.

Additionally, the measure arrives as the Bank of England (BoE) revealed it will be monitoring the booming buy-to-let sector in the coming months. This year, buy-to-let lending has accounted for over 15% of all mortgages.

It was also announced after the National Landlords Association (NLA) warned that costs in the private rental sector could increase by £2.6 billion if mortgage interest payments are made non tax-deductible.

Experts have claimed that the 45% tax relief puts landlords at an advantage against first time buyers.

The Budget document states: “The current tax system supports landlords over and above ordinary homeowners. Landlords can deduct costs they incur when calculating the tax they pay on their rental income. A large portion of those costs are interest payments on the mortgage.

George Osborne Says Landlords' Profits Will be Cut

George Osborne Says Landlords’ Profits Will be Cut

“Mortgage interest relief was withdrawn from homeowners 15 years ago. However, landlords still receive the relief.

“The ability to deduct these costs puts investing in a rental property at an advantage. Tax relief for finance costs is particularly beneficial for wealthier landlords with larger incomes, as every £1 of finance costs they incur allows them to pay 40p or 45p less tax.”1 

George Osborne says that he wants to support homeowners, but “act in a proportionate and gradual way.”1

However, one expert cautions that some investors may now struggle to make a profit. Deloitte’s Phil Nicklin, points out: “This measure will almost double the effective cost of borrowing for a taxpayer on the highest rate of tax.

“Currently, interest payments of £100 only cost £55 after tax relief, but will cost £80 from 2020. A landlord who borrows at even a modest level might end up paying more in tax than he makes in profit.

“This measure must make buy-to-let investment a less attractive proposition in future and may reduce the options for those who see it as an alternative to a pension.”1 

Director of Mayfair-based mortgage broker Anderson Harris, Adrian Anderson, comments: “There had been fears among landlords that tax relief on mortgage interest payments for buy-to-let landlords would be completely abolished, so while the changes will hit higher-rate taxpayers, it is not as bad as it might have been.

“It is only fair that there is a more level playing field between first time buyers and landlords, but if this tax break had been completely withdrawn, buy-to-let would have been far less attractive to investors.

“Thousands of landlords may well have struggled to keep up repayments on their mortgage or struggle to pay the tax, especially when interest rates rise.”1

Manager at Blick Rothenberg Chartered Accountants, Robert Pullen, says: “Buy-to-let landlords are now being hit further by a restriction to tax relief on mortgage interest payments.

“The new rules appear complex; basic rate tax relief is permitted only and will be phased in. This may result in a shortage of let properties, or an increase in rental rates charged to compensate landlords.”1

Head of UK Residential Research at estate agent Knight Frank, Gráinne Gilmore, states: “This is a significant change in tax status for those with a rental portfolio, although the measured rate of introduction between 2017 and 2020 will help landlords plan their approach.

“Those planning to purchase a buy-to-let property will have to factor these new rules into their calculations and this could affect the offers they are willing to make.

“If the relatively low yield environment seen today, especially in the South of England, is still evident when these changes start to come into force, there could be upward pressure on rents.”1 

The Budget document also reveals that the current system that allows landlords to claim 10% of their rent for wear and tear will be abolished. From April 2016, landlords will only be able to deduct costs that they actually incur.

Additionally, the Chancellor announced an increase to the amount homeowners can earn in rent from lodgers before being charged tax. This arrives after many have campaigned for a higher earning level in the rent-a-room scheme.

For the last 18 years, the level has been £4,250 of income, but will rise to £7,500 from April 2016.

Director of SpareRoom.co.uk, Matt Hutchinson, who has campaigned for this for the past six years, explains: “There are an estimated 19m empty bedrooms in owner-occupied properties in England alone.

“Freeing up just 5% of those rooms would accommodate almost a million people – the equivalent of a city the size of Birmingham.

“Encouraging people to take in lodgers could help them avoid repossession when interest rates rise and their mortgage repayments are adjusted.

“The threshold has remained unchanged at £4,250 for 18 years. Only a fifth of UK towns and cities have average room rents of below that mark, while all rooms in London are way outside of the threshold.”1

1 http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/buytolet/article-3153541/Profits-slashed-wealthy-buy-let-landlords-Budget-crackdown-mortgage-tax-relief.html

 

RLA’s Plea to George Osborne

Published On: July 8, 2015 at 11:51 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

The Residential Landlords Association (RLA) has spoken about what it would like to see in today’s Budget.

RLA's Plea to George Osborne

RLA’s Plea to George Osborne

Alan Ward, Chairman of the RLA, says: “The private rented sector is now the only housing tenure growing, with demand set to increase further.

“As the Financial Secretary to the Treasury has alluded to, encouraging growth in the sector is good for jobs and good for all those looking for a home.”

Last month, the Financial Secretary to the Treasury, David Gauke MP, responded to a parliamentary question by saying that private rental housing “supports the economy through improved labour market flexibility.”1

As most landlords are individuals renting out just a small number of properties, the RLA believes that the Government should recognise this as a business activity through the tax system.

The RLA is hoping for an end to tax rules that mean VAT can be reclaimed when a new home is built for owner occupation, but not for renting.

The RLA is also supporting the Government’s plans for growing homeownership, by calling for rollover relief on capital gains tax (CGT) when the sale of a rental property is to a first time buyer, with controls such as a maximum limit on price.

Ward adds: “The Chancellor has a golden opportunity to go for growth, which we urge him to seize.”1

1 http://www.mortgageintroducer.com/mortgages/253025/5/Industry_in_depth/Landlords’_plea_to_Osborne_ahead_of_budget.htm