Posts with tag: rogue landlords

Councils are Failing Tenants and Good Landlords, the RLA Insists

Published On: November 29, 2018 at 9:00 am

Author:

Categories: Lettings News

Tags: ,,

Councils across England and Wales are failing tenants and good landlords, according to a study by the Residential Landlords Association (RLA).

Two-thirds of councils in England and Wales brought no prosecutions against private landlords in 2017/18, the research found.

Almost a fifth of councils didn’t even issue any improvement notices during this period, which order a landlord to conduct certain repairs or improvements to a property.

Following the introduction in April 2017 of new powers for councils to issue civil penalties against landlords failing to provide acceptable housing, in 2017/18, 89% of local authorities did not use these powers. Half reported that they did not even have a policy in place to use them.

Analysis of the results from 290 local authorities replying to Freedom of Information requests from the RLA’s research platform, PEARL, shows that there is no clear link between a council operating a licensing scheme for landlords and levels of enforcement.

As MPs prepare to debate the private rental sector today, the RLA is arguing that the results of its study show that tenants and good landlords are being failed by a system that is unable to root out rogue landlords.

The RLA is calling for a renewed focus on enforcing the powers already available to councils. This includes: sustainable funding for enforcement departments; using Council Tax returns to help identify landlords; and councils doing more to find and take action against criminal landlords.

David Smith, the Policy Director of the RLA, says: “These results show that, for all the publicity around bad landlords, a large part of the fault lies with councils, who are failing to use the wide range of powers they already have. Too many local authorities fall back on licensing schemes, which, as this report proves, actually achieve very little except to add to the costs of the responsible landlords who register.

“Instead of policing licensing schemes, councils need to focus on finding and taking action criminal landlords.”

Judith Wilson Found Guilty of Failing to Comply with Enforcement Notice

Published On: November 20, 2018 at 10:27 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,

Ashford Borough Council has successfully prosecuted controversial landlord Judith Wilson, after she failed to comply with an enforcement notice ordering her to supply hot water to a disabled tenant.

Wilson, who, in court, confirmed that she is the landlord of around 300 properties, had denied the charge, but was found guilty by District Judge Justin Barron, following a two-day hearing at Folkestone Magistrates’ Court.

The case centred on an allegation that Wilson was the owner of a tenanted property at 17 Emperor Way, Ashford, which had ongoing problems with its hot water and heating system. This led to Ashford Borough Council serving an enforcement notice, requiring that the defects be remedied.

The Council told the court that Wilson failed to ensure that the defects were remedied within the period permitted by the notice, which led to the local authority carrying out the work itself.

Judith Wilson Found Guilty of Failing to Comply with Enforcement Notice

Judith Wilson Found Guilty of Failing to Comply with Enforcement Notice

In her defence, Wilson claimed that she had “a reasonable excuse” for failing to comply with the notice, namely that: the damage to the boiler and heating system was caused by the tenants or their agents; she was not permitted access to the premises; she had insufficient time to complete the work; and she reasonably relied on the Council to conduct the repair itself.

During the trial, Judge Barron heard prosecution evidence from two gas heating contractors, the tenants, Mr. and Mrs Manser, and a Council office. Mr. Manser is a wheelchair user. For the defence, a maintenance worker, Mrs Wilson and her husband, Mr. Wilson, gave evidence.

In delivering his verdict, Judge Barron said that the defendant had “every opportunity to resolve the issues, but Mr. Wilson was consistently difficult and stubbornly refused to make any genuine commitment to the Council to get the work carried out”.

He added: “The Wilsons have shrewdly built up what can best be described as a property empire. They know very well that there is no duty on the Council to carry out repairs on their behalf and then bill them for the work. As owners of around 300 properties, it is entirely reasonable to expect them to have arrangements in place to enable this type of issue to be dealt with promptly.

“Taking into account the evidence… I find that Mr. and Mrs Wilson could have had the work carried out within the period allowed by the abatement notice, but chose not to. In this case, those were not the actions of responsible landlords.”

Mrs Wilson will return to court on 11th December 2018, to hear Judge Barron pass sentence. He has made a financial circumstances order under Section 162 of the Criminal Justice Act, which requires Wilson to disclose in court documents that evidence all bank accounts, both individual and joint, plus all assets.

Ashford Borough Council says that the case is a powerful reminder to private landlords that there will be serious consequences if they fail to deal fairly with their tenants.

Councillor Gerald White, the Portfolio Holder for Housing at the Council, responds to the verdict: “This successful prosecution against a high-profile landlord shows that we have teeth and we are not afraid to fight for the rights of tenants who live in our borough.

“What a lot of private sector tenants don’t realise is that, if they have trouble with their landlord, they can come to us for help. Mr. and Mrs Manser didn’t know that until they were recommended to speak to us.”

He continues: “The Council champions the rights of tenants, and we make sure that landlords in the private sector remain accountable and live up to their responsibilities under the law. If they don’t, then there are consequences.

“In this case, we did everything we could to resolve the situation. We gave Mrs Wilson every opportunity to find a solution to the problem, but we were ignored. In the end, we realised that the only way to get justice for the tenants involved was to prosecute.”

Councillor White insists that Ashford Borough Council always aims to work in partnership with landlords, and he is pleased to hear that Judge Barron acknowledged that in his judgement, when he said: “I accept the evidence of Mr. Watts (Senior Environmental Health Officer) that he wanted to resolve the matter amicably and without resorting to enforcement action. He had better things to do with his time than get involved in this dispute – I understand his frustration.”

Judith Wilson and her husband, Fergus, have long been in the press, following controversies surrounding their large property portfolio.

Councils to Receive £2m to Tackle Criminal Landlords

Published On: November 9, 2018 at 9:00 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,

Councils will receive an extra £2m of funding from the Government to tackle criminal landlords that force tenants to live in substandard housing.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government’s £2m fund will be made available to councils across the country, which will bid for grants to help them step up enforcement efforts against criminal landlords.

The money will be used on a range of projects to help increase action, including developing digital solutions to help officers report incidents, so that decisions can be made more quickly.

Councils will also be able to use the money to support tenants’ actions against their landlords, through rent repayment orders.

There are currently 4.5m households in the private rental sector in England, with research from the latest English Housing Survey finding that 84% of tenants are satisfied with their accommodation.

The £2m will also be used to build relationships between councils, external legal services and local housing advocates, and encourage councils to share best practice of enforcement action with other local authorities.

The Minister for Housing and Homelessness, Heather Wheeler MP, says: “Everyone deserves to live in a home that is safe and secure, and it is vital we crack down on the small minority of landlords who are not giving their tenants this security.

“This funding will help further strengthen councils’ powers to tackle rogue landlords and ensure that poor-quality homes in their area are improved, making the housing market fairer for everyone.”

David Smith, the Policy Director for the Residential Landlords Association, also responds to the announcement: “We welcome news of new funding for enforcement, which we have long campaigned for, but believe it must be part of a long-term and sustainable settlement that provides the resources needed to support good landlords and root out the criminals.

“The vast majority of landlords do a good job and provide decent housing for their tenants. That’s why 84% of private tenants are satisfied with their accommodation, a higher proportion than the social rented sector.”

He adds: “Poor enforcement of the wide range of powers already available means that the minority of landlords who bring the sector into disrepute undercut the majority of good landlords and bring misery to the lives of their tenants. This is what the funding needs to tackle.”

The Law is Failing to Stop Rogue Landlords, the Guardian and ITV News Reveal

Published On: October 25, 2018 at 8:08 am

Author:

Categories: Law News

Tags: ,

Rogue landlords who have been ruled unfit to let their properties are continuing to operate by exploiting loopholes in the law, which is designed to protect the most vulnerable tenants.

These rogue landlords are collecting rents – often funded through housing benefit – despite being convicted of housing offences and failing to pass the fit and proper person tests required by lettings legislation in England and Wales, reveals an investigation by the Guardian and ITV News.

Worryingly, the study found that, due to the way the law is written, this is usually perfectly legal.

The Guardian and ITV News have also discovered that local authorities have failed to make a single entry onto the Government’s new database of rogue landlords in the six months since its launch.

Prior to the introduction of the database, the Government estimated that there were 10,500 rogue landlords operating in England and said that it expected more than 600 of the worst offenders to be entered onto the blacklist. The contents of the database are being kept secret from the public, with the Government stating that it was “not in the public interest” to explain why.

The Guardian and ITV News have highlighted several convicted landlords that have been judged unfit, but are still in business:

  • Bernard McGowan boasts a £30m property empire, but has been convicted six times of housing offences since 2014. He has failed the fit and proper person test in Brent, north London, but his properties continue to be let there, alongside other London boroughs (Camden and Newham) and in Hertfordshire.
  • A local councillor described Gary Fixter as a “despicable” landlord after he was convicted of housing offences in Scarborough, North Yorkshire in 2016. He was convicted again in Wirral in April this year, when he was told by a judge to “give up” letting property, due to the “totally unacceptable” conditions of his rental homes. Since then, he has been letting properties in Chester and Wirral.
  • Adrian Webb, a former firefighter, was convicted of letting a Liverpool property that breached fire regulations in 2016. He has also failed the city council’s fit and proper person test. He is currently letting property in neighbouring St Helens, where he was also successfully prosecuted in 2016 for failing to deal with damp and mould in one of his properties.
  • David McGuinness is a landlord who let a home described as a “shed in the back garden of a shabbily converted bedsit property” in 2012, and is one of 28 individuals Newham says that it has “banned” after failing the council’s fit and proper person test. McGuinness owns property in Ilford, which is licensed by the neighbouring London Borough of Redbridge to be let by a third-party agent.
  • Katia Goremsandu, once named the “country’s worst landlord”, has been convicted on multiple occasions. Goremsandu has now been banned from managing two homes in two London boroughs – Westminster and Haringey – under legislation usually used to control gang members or prolific drug offenders. She continues to own property in London that is let to tenants, and someone is occupying a luxury flat that she owns in Kensington, west London.

Under the existing legislation, a landlord can fail the fit and proper person test in one borough, but continue to legally let properties in other boroughs.

The law also allows landlords to continue letting homes in the borough where they are banned, so long as an approved third party manages them. Failing a fit and proper person test does not mean that all or any of the landlord’s properties are unfit.

Landlord licensing was introduced as part of the Housing Act, which came into force in 2006, and was billed as a way of forcing rogue landlords to clean up their acts. It gave councils the power to refuse a landlord a licence if the local authority did not deem them to be a fit and proper person to let property to tenants.

The Law is Failing to Stop Rogue Landlords, the Guardian and ITV News Reveal

The Law is Failing to Stop Rogue Landlords, the Guardian and ITV News Reveal

In order to decide whether a landlord is fit and proper, the legislation states that local authorities must consider whether “the landlord has contravened any provision of the law relating to housing or of landlord and tenant law”. However, it is rare for councils to judge that a landlord is not fit and proper.

The Guardian and ITV News’ findings have prompted experts to question whether local authorities have the resources to use existing laws, as well as recently enhanced enforcement powers.

Jacky Peacock, a Director of tenant charity Advice4Renters, says: “Having campaigned for many years to get [landlord] licensing on the statute books, we’ve been devastated that implementation has been so flawed.

“We see licences being issued even where a landlord has had previous convictions, so shouldn’t reasonably be deemed to be a fit and proper person, as the law requires. Even if he is prevented from holding a licence in one area, there’s a good chance he will be operating somewhere else.”

One leading housing academic believes that legislation governing the country’s private rental sector needs a complete overhaul.

Julie Rugg, a Senior Research Fellow at the University of York’s Centre for Housing Policy, who co-authored a study published last month on England’s private rental sector, says: “There is a lot to be said for saying: ‘You know what, can we just start again?’

“The more new legislation comes in, the chances of it not working in practice, with all the other legislation that’s in play, increases. At the moment, everyone is agreed that nothing is working.”

The research found that 250,000 families in England were bringing up babies and infants in private rental accommodation that failed to meet the decent homes standard.

The scale of that finding suggests that more than just a small minority of rogue landlords blights the private rental sector.

The authors of the report back the introduction of a “property MOT” – similar to the system that exists for cars – in which all properties let for residential purposes would need an annual standardised inspection by approved experts.

Since 2013, landlord licensing schemes have expanded, but vary hugely across the country, and, even within the same local authority area, there can be less stringent licence requirements in certain wards.

In addition to licensing, new legislation was introduced in April this year that could lead to the most serious offenders being banned from letting property anywhere in England.

The Minister for Housing and Homelessness, Heather Wheeler MP, comments: “Everyone deserves a decent and safe place to live, and we are reforming the private rented sector to make it fairer for all.

“Through fines, banning orders and the new rogue landlord database – warmly welcomed by councils – we have provided authorities with new enforcement tools to help them crack down on the minority of landlords who exploit tenants.”

However, Peacock adds: “Since April this year, the Government has given local authorities the power to issue banning orders, which would prevent a particular landlord from letting any properties. But if they cannot [use existing powers to] take over control of a single property, why should anyone think they will adopt a far bolder approach?”

Eleanor Southwood, a Councillor and Cabinet Member for Housing and Welfare Reform in Brent, gives her opinion on McGowan’s case: “We are appalled by the way Mr. McGowan consistently failed to meet standards, which resulted in our two convictions against him. We take the rights of tenants incredibly seriously. We work with all landlords, because this is the best way to ensure that their tenants are protected.”

McGowan did not respond to the Guardian and ITV News’ requests for comment, and, when approached outside of his Hertfordshire office, he hid in a café toilet for half an hour to avoid questions, before calling a taxi to pick him up outside.

Webb did respond: “I formally request that you do not bring myself and family any more upset on this matter by reporting this. I was a victim of circumstances and it has caused me much hardship in many ways. I am trying to put this behind me.”

Fixter, McGuinness and Goremsandu did not respond.

Thousands of Rented Homes Free to Operate Illegally, New Survey Reveals

Published On: October 9, 2018 at 9:28 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

Tens of thousands of rented rooms and bedsits could continue to operate illegally for the next three years, in breach of new housing regulations introduced last week to crack down on rogue landlords, new research has revealed.

The Government has estimated that new rules governing dangerous and overcrowded properties, introduced on 1st October  will affect more than 100,000 private rental properties not currently licensed.

However, of 326 councils in England with responsibility for housing, only a handful have established the number of properties in their areas that currently meet new Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO) regulations.

Several large metropolitan authorities including in London, Manchester, Leeds, Newcastle, Bristol and Norwich said they were unaware of how many properties in their areas were operating in breach of the regulations.

The National Association of Landlords (NLA) has been contacted by several members who tried to apply for licenses, but their local authority purported not to know anything about the changes or didn’t have a system in place to process their applications.

The regulations are intended to allow councils to crack down on landlords renting out substandard and overcrowded homes. Licensing requirements cover issues such as emergency lighting, soundproofing and fire proofing and they also set new minimum sizes for bedrooms.

They require properties with five or more occupants in two or more households to be licensed, including houses converted into bedsits where tenants share toilets and cooking facilities. Any such property that does not have an HMO license is operating illegally and the landlord could face a fine of up to £30,000.

A 2008 Government report estimated there were 56,000 HMOs licensed under the previous definition, those of three storeys or higher.

They will automatically be passported over to the new arrangements, but the Government estimates a total of 160,000 properties could be covered by the new regulations and have given local authorities up to three years to identify them.

Research carried out by Doncaster-based Touchstone, a company that runs property investment courses across the UK, has revealed massive gaps in local authorities’ knowledge of where these properties are and who owns them. Most are relying on landlords to submit license applications.

Of the 238 authorities that responded to a Freedom of Information request, sent at the start of September, asking how prepared they were for the changes, 93 said they had carried out research to establish how many properties in their area require an HMO license.

Only 14 said they had conducted research to establish how many of those properties were in a condition where they could expect to be granted a license.

It is estimated the HMO changes will cost buy-to-let landlords £79m, according to research carried out by the Centre for Economics and Business Research.

 

New HMO regulations mean that more landlords could require a license for their properties

Touchstone CEO Paul Smith commented: “It’s clear the Government has passed legislation without any clear idea about the scale of the issue and we could be sleepwalking into a housing disaster,” said Smith.

“We’re aware of one local authority with 1800 properties classed as HMOs and privately it told us that only around 40% will meet the new regulations. If that’s happening across the country, we could be looking at a major problem.”

Smith said many landlords, faced with paying an average of £1,027 for HMO licenses as well as the cost of upgrading, may simply sell-up, exacerbating an already chronic shortage of homes in some areas.

The buy-to-let market is already slowing down following the recent introduction of a 3% residential property levy on landlords, the ending of mortgage interest tax relief and new stress tests for home loans.

“Ministers have estimated 160,000 properties could be affected but I would be interested to know how they arrived at that figure as most local authorities have not conducted any research,” he said.

“Clearly properties cannot continue to operate illegally and so the human cost of this is potentially thousands of people being made homeless.”

Of the councils that responded to the FoI request by Touchstone, only 14 had carried out research to establish how many properties in their area were likely to be affected by the changes as well as into how many were likely to be granted a license.

Manchester City Council estimated it had 5000 properties in its area now classed as HMOs, but it hadn’t researched how many were in a condition to meet the new regulations.

North Somerset Council said it had 2940 properties affected, Peterborough and Bournemouth put the number at up to 2500 while Cambridge, York and Hull city councils estimated they had more than 1000 HMOs. None was able to say how many were currently operating illegally.

Leeds, Bristol and Norwich were among the majority of authorities who said they had not carried out any research to establish how many properties in their area might be affected or how many might pass or fail.

Richard Lambert, CEO of the NLA, remarked: “This is an unacceptable failing on the part of the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, which should have ensured all local authorities were up to speed with the changes. It’s disappointing that more consideration hasn’t been made for the significance of this change and the challenges local authorities face in implementing it.

“HMO licensing was originally introduced to address fire safety in properties with three or more floors. Smaller HMOs don’t have the same issues, so it’s difficult to see what the Government aims to achieve with this blanket approach.

“Some landlords will have to reduce the number of rooms they let as smaller rooms may not meet the new minimum room sizes. They also must cover the increased costs and so are likely to pass these on to tenants. This alone won’t see landlords leave the market, but when combined with the other regulatory changes, the costs are affecting the viability of running lettings businesses.”

He added: “We‘re also concerned that local authorities appear unprepared for the changes and have, anecdotally, heard that landlords may be being given advice which could put them at risk of breaking the law.

“Our advice to all landlords is to check if your property falls under the new regulations, and if your local authority does not yet have a process in place, make sure you apply using the existing mandatory HMO licensing scheme and receive an acknowledgement of your application.”

Hackney Council Targets Unscrupulous Landlords with Licensing

Published On: October 4, 2018 at 9:19 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

Landlords who own property in Hackney and East London should be aware that subsequent to a consultation earlier in the year Hackney Council has decide to introduce a license scheme across three new areas.

Moreover, landlords who own properties in Brownswood, Cazenone and Stoke Bewington have been given until 3rd December to acquire a license or potentially be confronted with a fixed penalty of up to £30,000, a prosecution with unlimited fine, or simply be forced to pay tenants back up to a year’s rent.

The approval of new powers to protect the borough’s growing number of private renters mean that more than 1,500 privately rented homes blighted by serious hazards or disrepair must now be brought up to scratch by Landlords
of Hackney’s 4,000 Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs) will also have to apply for a licence under the new arrangements approved by the council.

Kim Wright, Hackney’s director for housing, said: “Many of Hackney’s landlords provide a good, professional service, and we’re looking forward to working with them to create better conditions for renters.
“But these new measures – along with our expanded team – will tackle those who don’t treat renters fairly or keep their homes safe.”