Posts with tag: first time buyers

The Buy for Uni Mortgages Turning Students into Landlords

Published On: February 28, 2017 at 11:21 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,,

The last thing students graduating from university expect to have in this day and age is a mortgage – the student loan debt they have and difficulty in raising a deposit mean that most will have to wait years before they can get onto the property ladder. Unless, of course, they are homeowners already.

That’s where the new Buy for Uni mortgages come in. Lenders are now looking to students as customers for early mortgages, which effectively turn them into landlords.

The new Buy for Uni mortgage from the Loughborough Building Society promises up to 100% financing for a property purchase, as long as close relatives provide security. A similar product has been on offer through Bath Building Society for some years, although both have been met with caution from student representatives.

Under Loughborough Building Society’s deal, students who are over 18 and in higher education in England and Wales can acquire a loan for up to £300,000, as long as the property is within ten miles of where they study.

Supporting them must be members of their immediate family – parents, step-parents or grandparents – who can provide security in cash or equity in a property, such as the family home, if the loan is for more than 80% of the property’s value. Interest rates range from 4.54%-4.74%, depending on what security is provided and the term of the mortgage.

Gary Brebner, the Chief Executive of the building society, believes the mortgage is a gateway product to get on the property ladder. After the three or five-year term, when the student will have graduated, it is expected that the loan will change into a more traditional mortgage.

As it’s unlikely that a student’s income will cover the repayments, the student instead becomes a landlord, earning money from the spare rooms by renting them out.

Brebner explains: “What you want is that the rental income covers more than the commitment, so if there is a rise in interest rates, it will cover it. Or that the guarantor says: ‘Well, yes, if interest rates did go up, or there was a void in rent, I the guarantor will pay that rent instead.’”

He adds that there has been substantial interest in the offer, but no money has yet been lent.

In Bath, however, the model has been in operation for nine years. Bath Building Society reports that the loans now account for around 10% of it mortgage business.

Again, a guarantee is needed from parents to bring the loan-to-value (LTV) ratio down to 75%. This means that if a student wants to take out a 100% mortgage to buy a £200,000 property, the parent must provide a £50,000 charge.

Chief Executive Dick Jenkins says that, in most circumstances, the rental income goes “a long way towards” covering the repayments, working better in some towns than others.

“We do come across the occasional person who thinks that we are offering them an enormous amount of beer money, but we obviously disabuse them of that notion quickly,” he says. “Most people are pretty serious and switched on and tend to come from reasonably well-off families, because we do need to take a collateral charge over mum and dad’s property to make that product work, so there has to be some equity in the parents’ property.”

However, he admits: “In some senses, that defines you as approaching more middle-class households than working-class, but that does not mean it is not a valid product for a given segment of the population.”

Student representatives have moved to ensure that undergraduates are aware of what they are getting themselves into when signing up for the mortgages at a potentially very young age.

The Buy for Uni Mortgages Turning Students into Landlords

The Buy for Uni Mortgages Turning Students into Landlords

The Vice President for Welfare at the National Union of Students, Shelly Asquith, insists: “Students should be careful of offers that seem too good to be true. Buying a house will usually involve significant hidden costs for deposits, agents and surveyors, even if the monthly payments seem to compare well with rented properties.”

Jenkins acknowledges that the Buy for Uni mortgage is not for everyone and recognises the criticism: “This is not a product that is available to all, because not everybody has got the parental equity to put into the equation. But that is no reason not to help those who have. We do get a little bit of flak about whether it is an elitist product. I don’t think it is.

“But certainly it works best for students who are probably on long courses, who can get the best benefit out of it over a longer period.”

However, while students may not be famous for their devotion to personal finance, Jenkins says that default rates on loans are much lower than on standard mortgages.

“We have found that the student-parental bond – that understanding that the parents and students have – means that if there is a payment problem, we tend not to see it because it gets resolved before it gets to us,” he explains. “They sort it out between themselves. I can honestly say that, in nine years, we have never had a problem case.”

But are the Buy for Uni mortgages saddling students with heavy debt at too young an age?

Brebner further maintains that they are not for everyone: “When we meet someone, we want to be sure that they know what they are doing. It might be that their circumstances are not quite right. It might be their guarantor circumstances are not quite right.

“There are going to be a number of things which we will explore as part of this to make sure that anyone who takes this as an alternative to renting, or as an alternative to student accommodation, understands what they are getting into.”

He adds: “We are not encouraging people to take on debt that they don’t understand or they wouldn’t understand their responsibilities towards. We are quite a cautious lender.”

Two mortgage experts, however, have given their views on the Buy for Uni loans:

David Hollingworth, of London & Country Mortgages, says that, as the loans are niche products, the interest rates are higher than would normally be expected: “The rates are higher than would typically be available to a first time buyer, even where parental security is being used, such as the Barclays Family Springboard deal that offers a three-year fixed rate of 2.99% up to 100% LTV with no fee where 10% parental cash is locked down as additional security.

“Both lenders offer the product on variable rates, so there is less stability on offer, but, nonetheless, these deals could offer a very practical and smart solution to the right person.”

Alistair Hargreaves, the Executive Mortgage Protection Consultant at broker John Charcol, isn’t convinced that rental income will cover the stress tests: “If somebody doesn’t have any capital to go down on this and they have to put a charge against their property and someone is going to be at university for three or four years, I can see it making sense. I just think rents are not going to be enough to sustain it, so mum and dad are going to have to have a decent income to back it up.”

One benefit, however, is that the property will be in the child’s name, points out Hollingworth: “That avoids any potential Stamp Duty Land Tax surcharge on the purchase of additional property, assuming that the parent already owns their own home.”

Regardless, parents need to understand the impact of providing security, he emphasises: “If everything went horribly wrong – the property was repossessed and sold for less than the outstanding debt – the lender could claim the shortfall from the parental cash or equity.

“In addition, where the parent is using their property as the additional collateral, it could have an impact on any future borrowing against their own home. Where using cash as security, the funds will remain in the parental names, but will not be accessible while they remain as security.”

What do you think of the new Buy for Uni mortgages – are they a good idea?

Window of Opportunity for First Time Buyers as Landlords Hold Back

Published On: February 20, 2017 at 9:35 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

There’s a window of opportunity for first time buyers to get onto the housing ladder this year, as buy-to-let landlords hold back from purchasing more properties, reports Rightmove.

The latest House Price Index from the property portal shows a steady start to the year. The monthly increase in the price of homes coming onto the market, at 0.4%, is very similar to the 0.5% rise recorded in January last year.

Early indicators of housing demand also appear robust, with Rightmove traffic up by 5% compared to a year ago. This increase in search activity is notable, claims the portal, given that a year ago, market activity was buoyed by the November 2015 announcement that second home and buy-to-let Stamp Duty would be raised from April 2016.

With this year having no such dynamic, there is a New Year window of opportunity for first time buyers to fill the void left by buy-to-let landlords, insists the firm.

The Director and Housing Market Analyst at Rightmove, Miles Shipside, comments on the data: “The 0.4% monthly and 3.2% year-on-year price increases are indicators of the continued market momentum from the autumn. Demand for a suitable home is such that visits to the Rightmove website are still up by 5% year-on-year, despite being compared to a period that was boosted by high demand from buy-to-let investors rushing to beat the Stamp Duty deadline. Year-on-year comparisons for transactions in the first quarter of 2017 should also allow for the distortion of last April’s additional Stamp Duty tax deadline, as transactions were up 40% in the first quarter last year.”

First time buyers will benefit from more choice and negotiating power this year, believes Shipside.

Window of Opportunity for First Time Buyers as Landlords Hold Back

Window of Opportunity for First Time Buyers as Landlords Hold Back

With markedly fewer buy-to-let purchasers than this time last year, the number of sales agreed in the typical first time buyer sector – two bedrooms or less – was down by 13.2% in December compared to the same month in 2015 (although sales agreed in this sector were still up by 0.8% when compared with December 2014, which was not distorted by the buy-to-let rush).

As a result, available stock for sale in this sector is up by 1.9% on last year, offering more choice for first time buyers. This contrasts to the same period a year ago, when available stock plummeted by 18%, as active buy-to-let purchasers reduced choice and limited buyers’ ability to negotiate.

Shipside adds: “Those planning to buy their first home in 2017 have more choice of properties and less competition from other buyers than their counterparts a year ago. It’s a possible learning point for aspiring first time buyers that a year ago, buy-to-let purchasers acted more quickly and closed deals at a faster rate, appearing not to take a Christmas break. Admittedly, they had the financial incentive of a deadline to motivate them, but first time buyers still have time to act and currently have the incentive of stronger negotiating power to try and mitigate the upwards trajectory of property prices.”

However, a restraining force on potential first time buyer activity is increasingly stretched affordability. Their favoured target sector, of two bedrooms or less, has seen the greatest price rises both month-on-month (2.6%) and annually (6.4%) of any sector, although this is partly a legacy from last spring’s buy-to-let surge.

Shipside advises: “Some sellers of first time buyer properties may be being over-optimistic with their pricing, giving an opportunity for budget-strapped first time buyers to negotiate, especially if they act now while there’s still more choice available.”

Comments 

The National Sales Director of estate agent Leaders, Kevin Shaw, comments on the Rightmove figures: “It is clear that first time buyers are outnumbering buy-to-let investors right now. We have seen an increasing number of one-bedroom apartments, which historically would attract first time buyers and investors in equal numbers, snapped up by the former. This is largely because first time buyers have had numerous offers accepted over the asking price, so are obviously determined and able to secure these properties in the current market.

“Investors are understandably focused on the price as this drives the yield, and generally do not want to get into a bidding war to secure these properties. It is a similar story with modest freehold houses in town centre locations, which would typically attract investors. But in recent months the majority of viewers have been private first time buyers.”

Mark Manning, the Director of Manning Stainton in Leeds, Harrogate, Wetherby and Wakefield, also says: “As we got off the train onto the 2017 platform, it was difficult to know who might be there to greet us. Were we to expect a lonely welcome and a continuation of the subdued market we saw at the end of the year, or a swathe of new sellers ready to greet us?

“Fortunately, the answer appears for now to have been the latter. New seller enquiries are 26% up on the same time last year, giving the strongest indication that we may see a slight ease in the lack of supply in the market. Now this will be welcome news amongst first time buyers who have registered in strong numbers and are waiting for much needed new stock to come to market. Combine this with a comparative reduction in new investors and landlords of 32% over the last quarter compared to the same quarter a year ago, and this may well be the year of the first time buyer.”

The CEO of online estate agent eMoov.co.uk, Russell Quirk, responds: “Judging by these latest figures, the market seems to have been slow out of the blocks for 2017, but this isn’t the most transparent picture of current conditions for two reasons.

“Firstly, the market will be very much finding its feet again, with many sellers having abstained from their sale for the Christmas period. Thus, any slowdown so early in the year is likely to be seasonal, with the market getting a second wind heading into spring.

Secondly, it is important to remember Rightmove’s data is based very much on asking price, not sold price, and gives us just a one-month snapshot into one side of the property selling process.”

He continues: “What it does tell us for sure is that the seller apprehension that remained prevalent throughout the back end of 2016 doesn’t seem to have quite subsided, despite the market remaining strong. As a result, UK sellers seem to be adjusting their asking price in order to push through a sale in what they believe to be a weakened market.

“Regardless of this trepidation, Rightmove reported a 3% annual increase in traffic levels, which suggests that demand on the other side of the fence remains strong. Not only are these early bird buyers likely to nab themselves a bargain due to the lower asking prices across the market, but this heightened activity will no doubt see this lull reversed when Rightmove release next month’s figures.”

The Help to Buy Scheme’s Impact Across England Revealed

Published On: February 17, 2017 at 10:30 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,,

BBC News has analysed the impact of the Help to Buy scheme across England, particularly in London, following the release of official figures.

The study found that one in three new build homes outside London were bought through the Help to Buy Equity Loan scheme between April 2013 and April 2016, while just one in ten were purchased in the capital.

The Help to Buy scheme was introduced to boost the housing market by getting first time buyers onto the property ladder.

A property expert believes the scheme has had “little success” in London, where, in some cases, loans of up to £190,000 have been taken out.

The Government reports that it has helped buyers purchase more than 100,000 homes across England.

To assess the impact of the scheme, BBC England has analysed official figures from the Department for Communities and Local Government. It found:

  • Help to Buy loans were used to purchase 76,559 homes outside of London between April 2013 and April 2016. This is equivalent to 30% of the 255,960 privately built new homes completed in that period.
  • In London, there were 4,483 completions using equity loans, equivalent to 11% of the 41,480 privately built new properties over the same timeframe.
  • Taking all households into account, less than one in every 500 London homes were bought using a Help to Buy loan, compared with one in every 200 elsewhere in England.
  • There was a surge in uptake of the loans in Greater London since February 2016, when the Government increased the upper limit for new homebuyers in the capital from 20% to 40% of the property’s value.
The Help to Buy Scheme's Impact Across England Revealed

The Help to Buy Scheme’s Impact Across England Revealed

Just ten equity loans had been taken out in the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham by October 2016 since their introduction in 2013, with buyers receiving £1.9m between them, or an average of £190,000 each.

Six of these buyers were helped between June and September 2016 alone, suggesting that the rise in the upper limit made a massive difference.

In Kensington and Chelsea – the most expensive place to live in the country – the only two loans taken out were worth a combined £360,000.

The highest number of loans taken out per head of population was in Bedford, where the 1,268 loans were equivalent to two in every 100 households. Between them, the loans came to £62.9m, or £49,416.68 each.

The average loan in England, including London, was worth £46,301.03.

Take-up rate in London 

The BBC expresses concerns over the rate of take-up in London, which is significantly lower than in the rest of England.

Henry Pryor, a property agent and housing market commentator, warned that there could be a “severe hangover” once the subsidies of Help to Buy are removed.

He says: “The Help to Buy initiatives have been more helpful away from the South East, where prices are lower. Clearly, there is less practical opportunity in London, which is one reason why the numbers here are so small. Even the capital’s own version (with a higher upper loan limit of 40%) has had little success.”

He said the schemes had “clearly helped politically and practically”, but added: “The question is whether the Government can wean lenders and developers off the financial drug that it has become addicted to.

“Watching commercial businesses [housebuilders and developers] get fat on taxpayer subsidies is not something that can or perhaps should last forever. At some stage, we will need to remove the punchbowl and, when that happens, the hangover may be severe.”

Roger Harding, the Director of Communications, Policy and Campaigns at Shelter, also comments: “While a Help to Buy equity loan might help some first time buyers onto the ladder, in the short-term, there is a risk it will push up house prices, making it even tougher for others to buy a home in the future.

“If the Government really wants to tackle our housing shortage, its best bet is to start with building homes that are genuinely affordable for people in low to average incomes to buy and rent long-term.”

Housebuilders, however, insist that the Equity Loan scheme has helped first time buyers who would not otherwise have been able to purchase a home.

Gavin Stewart, the Sales Director at Barratt London, said it had proved an “effective way for many Londoners to get on the property ladder”.

Luke Smith and Barbara Antkowiak, who bought a Barratt London home in Hendon with a Help to Buy loan, says it means they spend less than they would on rent.

Smith says: “We’re hoping that by the time we come to pay it off, the house will have gained enough in equity.”

A spokesperson from the Department for the Communities and Local Government, reports: “Help to Buy equity loans have helped more than 100,000 households get on the housing ladder since it was launched in 2013. It is one of a number of housing schemes provided by the Government, so people have a choice of what is right for them.”

There is little evidence that the scheme is pushing up house prices, they add.

The Department claims that London Help to Buy is “performing strongly” and has seen take-up double since the upper limit was raised in February 2016.

Do you believe the impact of the scheme has been positive?

First Time Buyers Borrowed More in 2016 than Any Year Since 1974

Published On: February 15, 2017 at 9:30 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,,

First Time Buyers Borrowed More in 2016 than Any Year Since 1974

First Time Buyers Borrowed More in 2016 than Any Year Since 1974

First time buyers borrowed more in 2016 than any other year since the data was first recorded in 1974, according to the latest figures from the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML).

First time buyers borrowed £53.2 billion in 2016, up by 13% on the previous year, and amounting to 8% more loans, at 338,900.

Home movers took out 360,300 loans, down by 2% on 2015, but the amount borrowed totalled £74.3 billion, which was up by 3% on an annual basis.

Buy-to-let lending was up by 3% over the year by number of loans, while the total value grew by 7%. Remortgaging accounted for two-thirds of the total.

However, when removing buy-to-let remortgages from the data, the amount of buy-to-let loans for house purchase dropped by a huge 38% year-on-year.

The Director General of the CML, Paul Smee, says: “2016 could have been a potentially destabilising year of regulatory and political change, but the mortgage market has been resilient and adaptable.

“Homeowner house purchase lending increased, though the buy-to-let sector’s positive lending performance has been driven primarily by remortgaging.”

He looks ahead: “We do not expect the market volumes to show a year-on-year increase in 2017, but instead remain similar to that achieved in 2016.”

The Chairman of estate agent Jackson-Stops & Staff, Nick Leeming, responds to the data: “Mortgage lending data from the CML for home purchasers and first time buyers remain strong overall, showing that we continue to be a nation of aspiring homeowners, despite the dearth of available properties.”

The figures should prove positive reading for prospective first time buyers, at a time when many are stuck in expensive private rental homes. Worryingly, however, PwC believes that only one in four tenants will be homeowners by 2025.

Nevertheless, with the Government shifting its focus from homeownership to renting, it may be easier for tenants to save and live more comfortably before they can get onto the property ladder.

Over Half of Private Tenants Believe they will Never Own a Home

Published On: January 26, 2017 at 10:05 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,

Over half of private tenants in the UK believe they will never own their own home, according to a worrying new survey.

As house prices continue to rise in some parts of the country, private tenants often consider saving for a deposit to be the greatest barrier to getting onto the property ladder.

Over Half of Private Tenants Believe they will Never Own a Home

Over Half of Private Tenants Believe they will Never Own a Home

The study, conducted by property investment consultancy Knight Knox, found that less than a quarter (23%) of private tenants are currently saving for a deposit, with many renters having little hope of affording a deposit for their own home, unless their circumstances change dramatically.

The survey, which polled 2,000 private tenants across the UK, suggests an acceptance among those living in the private rental sector that owning a home will remain unattainable, believes Andy Phillips, the Commercial Director of Knight Knox.

He explains: “With rising house prices and stagnant salaries, it appears that many people currently renting have come to terms with the idea that they’ll never own a home and now accept renting as a viable option in the long-term.

“We’ve grown up in this country with the notion that you must settle down and buy a house, but, due to numerous factors, that’s not as much of a reality as it once was, and we’re starting to see the stigma traditionally attached to renting dissolve.”

He adds: “The reducing number of people saving for a deposit could mean we’re seeing a shift towards a private rental sector-centric property landscape, similar to that which has long been a way of life in Germany and wider continental Europe.”

In support of Phillips’ views, 61% of private tenants said they were content to rent, claiming that renting suits their lifestyles, and they do not want to be tied down to one property or a lengthy mortgage contract.

Phillips agrees: “The traditional model of homeownership doesn’t suit everyone’s lifestyle, and whether it’s the best way forward is being called into question.

“Meanwhile, the private rental sector is increasingly being seen as an essential solution to the lack of housing available, with rented homes expected to account for over seven million homes in the UK by 2025.”

The survey’s findings are good news for landlords, who can rest assured that demand from private tenants will remain high in the long-term, despite fears that investing in buy-to-let may not be as lucrative as it once was.

Number of Homebuyers at Highest Level for 13 Years in December

Published On: January 24, 2017 at 9:25 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

The average number of prospective homebuyers registered per estate agency branch was at the highest level for 13 years in December, according to the latest Housing Market Report from the National Association of Estate Agents (NAEA).

The group’s December study also found that the highest number of sales to first time buyers since 2001 was recorded last month.

Number of Homebuyers at Highest Level for 13 Years in December

Number of Homebuyers at Highest Level for 13 Years in December

The NAEA’s data shows that although the amount of homes available to buy rose marginally in December, the number of sales agreed fell by a quarter on a monthly basis.

Homebuyer demand

Last month, the amount of house hunters increased to the highest level seen since 2003 for the month of December.

The average number of prospective homebuyers registered per NAEA member branch stood at 386 in December, up by 12% on November’s figure of 344.

First time buyer sales 

In December, a third (32%) of sales were made to first time buyers – the highest number for the month of December since 2001, when it was also 32%.

This is up by 10% on November last year, when 29% of sales were made to these buyers.

Property supply and sales agreed 

The amount of properties available to buy on estate agents’ books in December stood at an average of 41 – up marginally from November, when there were 39.

Despite an increase in supply and demand, the number of sales agreed fell by a quarter (25%) on November, from an average of eight per branch to six.

The Managing Director of the NAEA, Mark Hayward, comments on the report: “In November, we saw a seasonal slowdown; typically it’s uncommon for people to buy and move close to Christmas. Yet, our December findings have completely bucked this seasonal trend. With demand at an all-time December high and sales to first time buyers at their highest on record, 2016 closed on a positive note following several months of uncertainty.

“However, despite an encouraging December, there remains a clear shortage of homes. We await the Government’s Housing White Paper to see how it intends to tackle this, and hope the market continues to improve for both buyers and sellers.”

While property market experts insist that the Government must do more to tackle the housing crisis, one investor and lender believes that small-scale developers are critical in supplying much-needed homes.