Search Results For: buy to rent sector

London Council Accused of Social Cleansing

Published On: May 7, 2015 at 9:41 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,,

A council in London has been accused of social cleansing after sending a letter to their tenants suggesting they move to Birmingham.

The letter, sent by Wandsworth Council, has been shared on social media and states that the Council has a number of private rental sector homes “within the areas either directly within or near the surrounding areas of Birmingham.”

Recipients are told that the Council will pay for any “bedrooms given up”, as well as aiding with the cost of moving.

It is thought that the Council are targeting pensioners in particular, as they are exempt from bedroom tax.

Labour’s parliamentary candidate for Battersea, Will Martindale, posted a photograph of the letter on Twitter, and said that the person who received it felt “not wanted” in her local area.

Martindale says: “It’s just wrong to pressure local families to leave Battersea and move to Birmingham. The real answer is to build more homes that local people can afford to rent and buy.

“This Tory council is out of control. First, they moved local homeless families to Leicester and Portsmouth. Now they offer some of our most vulnerable residents cash to move 100 miles away from their jobs, friends and schools.”1

The Housing and Community Services have conducted a report on the proposed Wandsworth Moves and Mobility Scheme. It claims that the Council hope to move 600 “under occupiers”1 – tenants who live in homes where not all bedrooms are occupied – in the next three years.

A Wandsworth Council spokesperson says: “This is a scheme that has been in place in Wandsworth for many years. Every other London borough has a similar policy.

“What is does is provide choices and incentives for tenants in larger properties to hand them back so that they can be used to provide new social rented homes for families on waiting lists who may be living in overcrowded conditions and need a bigger property.

“Offering a financial incentive is one of the ways in which tenants who don’t need such big homes can be encouraged to give them up.

“As the letter makes crystal clear, it is not compulsory and no one is forced to leave, but some residents are quite happy to move out of London because they may have family connections in other parts of the country or are looking to make a fresh start outside the capital.”1 

The Independent recently undertook a study that found over 50,000 households have been moved out of London in the past three years.1

This figure indicates that a huge amount of families cannot afford homes in their area and are therefore being relocated out of their communities to places away from the capital.

1 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/generalelection/general-election-2015-council-letter-encouraging-tenants-to-move-from-london-to-birmingham-accused-of-social-cleansing-10228380.html

 

 

Labour’s Housing Policies Take £200m off Value of Builders

Published On: May 1, 2015 at 10:49 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,,

The Labour Party’s housing plans have taken criticism from leading property experts as house builders experienced their share prices falling after Ed Miliband announced the proposals.

Around £200m was taken off the value of Taylor Wimpey, Barratt Developments and Persimmon after the policies were revealed on Sunday. One plan is to limit private landlords from increasing rent by more than CPI inflation for three years.

This could cause buy-to-let investors to leave the sector, as the market would be less profitable. This would worsen the shortage of housing for generation rent, which Labour has claimed to want to help.

The Association of Residential Letting Agents (ARLA) claim that three-quarters of its members are worried the plans will “see landlords exit the market and reduce supply.”1 

Head of the National Landlords Association (NLA), Richard Lambert, says: “We understand Labour wants to assure tenants they have their concerns at heart, but this policy will backfire because they don’t understand the economics of supplying private housing to rent.

“These changes will have far-reaching consequences for the private rented sector, for landlords’ willingness to put their own money into providing homes, and for mortgage lenders’ view of the risk in supporting them.

“If these proposals are going to be rushed into the first Queen’s Speech, less than a month away, without time to think through the consequences, Labour’s good intentions could make the housing crisis worse, not better.”1 

Labour's Housing Policies Take £200m off Value of Builders

Labour’s Housing Policies Take £200m off Value of Builders

The British Property Federation (BPF) has also cautioned that rent controls “could deter much needed investment in the housing sector.”

Chief Executive of the BPF, Melanie Leech, comments: “Ultimately what will help tenants best is more investment in housing.

“Pension funds and other institutions have billions to invest in this market; developing places that would provide a new generation of high-quality homes that offer greater choice to renters, including the option to sign longer tenancies.

“This additional investment will be vital to tackle the housing crisis, and we would urge the next government to do all it can to encourage it, rather than chase it away with an overly-proscriptive approach to rent setting.

“In places like London, tenants will find this policy on rents may make their budgeting harder, rather than easier. Their rent will tick along at CPI for a couple of years and then they will face a potential sharp rise in year three when the rent returns to market.”1 

Mr. Miliband seemed unaffected by the drop in house builder’s share prices: “Our proposals will be better for companies building homes in Britain. The housing market is not working. By common consent the Lyons plan is the most comprehensive for a generation. We can’t carry on with the status quo.”1

He says that small house builders will benefit from the policies.

Labour’s plan to abolish Stamp Duty for first time buyers on homes worth up to £300,000 also faced disapproval. The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) believes it could further push up house prices.

Head of Policy at RICS, Jeremy Blackburn, says: “While this proposed Stamp Duty reform could help some first time buyers in the market, it’s another measure that tinkers with demand-side stimulus. Prices are already predicted to rise in the next parliament and this is only likely to make matters worse.”1

Labour first revealed rent control plans last year.

Brandon Lewis, Conservative housing minister, comments: “Ed Miliband is relaunching a policy that descended into chaos when it was first announced; the experts he claimed backed his plans came out and attacked it as unworkable.

“Rent controls never work; they force up rents and destroy investment in housing, leading to fewer homes to rent and poorer quality accommodation. Even Ed Miliband’s own shadow housing minister admits they don’t work.”1 

Shares in Taylor Wimpey dropped as much as 2% in morning trading on Monday, while Barratt decreased as much as 1.9% and Persimmon as much as 1.8%.

By late morning, the value of the three FTSE 100 house building firms was £178m less. Shares in FTSE 250 house builders also dropped.

1 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/constructionandproperty/11565524/Housebuilders-hit-by-Ed-Milibands-rent-control-plans.html

 

The Housing Crisis is Breaching Human Rights

Published On: April 30, 2015 at 11:56 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,,

A report by charities has found that the housing crisis in the UK is in breach of United Nations (UN) human rights standards.

The UN human rights commitment to provide people with adequate housing has been violated because the housing crisis is so serious. The housing charities highlight spiralling rental costs, harmful conditions in properties and increasing levels of homelessness.

The report also warns of “profound issues of lack of supply, increasing housing costs, lack of security of tenure and homes of such poor quality that they are unfit for habitation.”

The group, called Just Fair, is made up of Crisis, Oxfam, Amnesty International, Save the Children and UNICEF UK.

The report’s author, Dr. Jessie Hohmann, a law lecturer at Queen Mary University of London, says: “It is quite clear we are in breach of our UN obligations. It is possible to take policy steps to protect the most vulnerable and marginalised, but the UK government has decided not to do that. Since the 1980s, we have lost any concept of housing’s social function, and that is why protest movements are gaining ground.

“Without decent housing, you can’t experience an adequate life in society, but now housing is seen just as an asset.”1

In the 40-page document, Just Fair revealed:

  • Private rent costs are double those of council properties, at £163 per week. A quarter of renters depend on housing benefit to pay.
  • A third of properties in the private rental sector do not meet basic health, safety and habitability standards.
  • The amount of people sleeping rough in London rose by over a third between autumn 2013 and autumn 2014, and funding for shelters dropped.
  • Last December, there were around 62,000 families in England living in temporary accommodation. This is the highest number for five years, with a further 280,000 households at risk of homelessness.
  • The amount of families living in bed and breakfasts has more than tripled from 630 in 2010 to 2,040 in 2014.
  • “Exceptionally high” levels of homelessness and the rising number of families at risk of homelessness represents “a serious failing in the government’s obligations.”
The Housing Crisis is Breaching Human Rights

The Housing Crisis is Breaching Human Rights

The organisation says that the UN requirements to “recognise the right of everyone to an adequate standard of living”, including housing, can only be breached in instances of “force majeure”, such as natural disaster or war. Cuts made when the country is in financial crisis should be ended when the crisis finishes.

The shocking report arrives as politicians deliver their housing policies in the general election campaign. Chief Executive of Crisis, Jon Sparkes, says that the report “should be a wake-up call for all political leaders.”

Recently, Labour announced their rent controls proposal. Find out more: /milliband-gives-his-answer-to-housing-problem/. The Conservatives have vowed to extend the right to buy scheme to housing association tenants. Read more: /how-would-the-conservatives-right-to-buy-work/.

Housing protests have also emphasised the public’s frustration over the state of the property market. Read about the Reclaim Brixton demonstration: /the-purpose-of-brixtons-anti-gentrification-protest/.

The Just Fair report is critical of the coalition’s housing policies: “Problems in realising the right to housing are linked to a political climate of austerity, and attendant cuts to state social security and other benefits. The resulting situation is accurately identified as one of crisis.”

It also cites one of the most serious problems as the failure to build enough homes, which goes back to Labour and Conservative governments.

Some of the things worsening the crisis are the removal of bedroom tax, the “stark undersupply” of new homes and insecurity of tenure in the private rental sector, says the report.

Additionally, it states: “It should be a matter of significant concern that one third of households in the private rental sector are living in housing that is substandard to the point that it is unsafe or unhealthy.”

The report revealed that “revenge evictions”1, when tenants are evicted when asking for improvements, are too common, with around 200,000 in 2013. That is a breach of the UN’s prohibition of arbitrary eviction, claims the report.

Brandon Lewis, Conservative housing minister, responds to the findings: “We inherited a broken housing market after Labour’s housing crash.” He adds, “there is more to do”, but the Conservatives will provide 275,000 new affordable homes in the next parliament. 

Lewis continues: “Despite the need to pay off Labour’s deficit, Conservatives in government have worked hard to increase house building to its highest since 2007 and delivered 217,000 new affordable homes. We will ensure economic growth and stability to allow continued investment in frontline services for homeless and the vulnerable.”1

Labour’s Emma Reynolds says: “Under David Cameron, house building is at its lowest levels in peacetime since the 1920s, there is a severe lack of affordable homes, families face growing insecurity in the private rented sector, and there has been a dramatic rise in homelessness and rough sleeping. Labour will take action to tackle this crisis.

“We will get 200,000 homes built a year by 2020, boost the number of affordable homes built year on year, reform the private rented sector and we will set out a long-term strategy to tackle homelessness and rough sleeping.”1

Crisis’ Jon Sparkes explains: “Rough sleeping has risen by 55% in the past five years. This dreadful state of affairs is the result of successive governments’ failure to tackle the housing crisis, combined with severe cuts to housing benefit that have left growing numbers of people struggling to keep a roof over their heads.

“The housing crisis will not solve itself. We desperately need more affordable homes as well as political action to fix our broken private rented sector.”1

The report will inform a UN review of housing in England this autumn. The Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust largely funded it.

1 http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/apr/28/uk-housing-crisis-in-breach-of-human-rights

Double Election Could Stagnate Property Market

The high-end housing market has come to a halt ahead of the general election, as uncertainty surrounds the property sector.

Estate agents and buyers who seek out homes for the wealthy have admitted that the market for pricey properties has stagnated.

But there could be a bleaker future ahead, as the possibility of a double election looms. This could further put Britain’s luxury housing market into lockdown.

Managing Director of Rokstone estate agents, Becky Fatemi says: “It’s the elephant in the room, an absolute nightmare for the industry.”1

A second election soon after 7th May is not the most likely outcome, but with such a close campaign, it could still happen, says Andrew Hawkins, Chief Executive of political polling organisation ComRes.

The Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition introduced the Fixed-term Parliaments Act in 2011 that set the period between elections at five years and marked the date of the next poll five years in advance.

Hawkins explains that this allows for early dissolution of parliament if a motion for an early general election is agreed by at least two-thirds of the whole Houses of Parliament, or if a vote of no confidence is passed and the Commons do not form an alternative government within 14 days.

He says: “The use of a fixed-term parliament is deeply unpopular; effectively it takes the timing of an election out of the hands of the prime minister and gives it to the opposition. Therefore, a second election could be triggered if the Act is repealed.”

If David Cameron loses narrowly, he could force another public vote. Hawkins says: “If, in the immediate aftermath, the Tories have secured more votes than seats, and Labour scrapes over the line with a coalition, then Mr. Cameron could immediately turn around and demand that the country deserves another chance at voting in a majority.”1

Otherwise, a minority party in a coalition could destroy the current government or at the Queen’s Speech on 27th May, a confidence vote could be conducted.

A second election or another coalition could greatly impact the unstable property market, especially the high-end London sector.

Research from Hamptons and Jeffries found that property transactions slow down around the general election, with prices spiralling at the time of the vote and in the six months afterwards.

Chief Executive of developer Urban & Civic, Nigel Hugill says that the decline in activity has been experienced in the luxury end of the market, with the annual growth rate for the whole of London dropping from 13% in the year to January, to 9.4% this February, which was reported by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).1 

Double Election Could Stagnate Property Market

Double Election Could Stagnate Property Market

Hugill, who is also Chairman of the Centre for Cities organisation, says: “The long-term property market cycle led us to a cooling in London, but two elections would place a further restriction on activity in the capital. London changes direction quickly and substantial uncertainty will temper it further.” 

Labour’s proposed mansion tax and plans to remove non-dom status will concern buyers, sellers and builders in London.

Hugill continues: “The SNP, Labour and the Liberal Democrats have talked gleefully about taxing property in London, but have been utterly unspecific about how to do it.”1

Adam Challis, Head of Residential Research at property advisers JLL, agrees that a double election will affect volumes and prices.

“Uncertainty breeds uncertainty, something that markets view dimly; expect to see currency depreciation, slower investment and a level of caution to permeate. In the housing market, I would expect activity to remain weak which will have a modest negative impact on prices, mortgages levels will stay low and central London will bear the brunt.”1 

After a quiet six months, the mainstream market in London has started to pick up again recently, as house builders Taylor Wimpey and Telford Homes have reported strong demand for new builds in the first quarter (Q1), and the Government extend their Help to Buy scheme and Isa.

However, a dip in the higher end of the market will affect the rest of the South East, as lack of investment impacts jobs and slows the rate households move from London to the commuter belt.

Property Analyst at broker Jeffries, Anthony Codling, says: “In the mainstream market, there would be a potential transaction lull as people put off moving plans until the shape of government starts to [become clearer].”1

Jake Russell, of Russell Simpson estate agents in Kensington and Chelsea, explains what would happen in the event of a second election: “A double election resulting from a hung parliament would lead to further uncertainty, a groundhog day, and in all likelihood, prospective purchasers continuing to wait and see.

“The property-related left-wing policies have far-reaching implications which not only target wealth-creators but close London off to international business and investors, undermining London as a world-class city.”

Russell also says that Labour’s non-dom plans would cause investors to leave the London market, “as the great business minds of the globe, alongside wealthy overseas individuals, seek to invest elsewhere.”1

Director of upmarket agent Rescorp Residential, Vic Chhabria, agrees: “For argument’s sake, let’s say a Labour-Liberal Democrat coalition comes into power and it all collapses. I believe a Conservative-Lib Dem coalition would bring about a new wave of confidence and would very quickly act as a catalyst for a bounce-back of the housing industry.

“If a time lag for the double election exceeds the gestation period and the Labour-Lib Dems have already enforced legislation on all their levies and taxes, my fear is that the recovery of the housing market will be too little and too late.”1 

By this stage, those with non-dom status may have already chosen alternative tax jurisdictions and have no intention of returning to the UK, says Chhabria.

Lawyers organising multi-million pound sales are also concerned. A partner at Charles Russell Speechlys, Tom Moran, says: “Uncertainty is the killer in the short term. In the long term, the danger is that what has been a flourishing and prestigious property market will be permanently damaged.

“If the UK decides to punish the overseas buyer, the overseas buyer may decide to invest their significant capital in other economies, with all the impact on the sophisticated service economy in London and southern England that would entail.”1

1 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/property/house-prices/11565015/Double-election-nightmare-to-trigger-property-market-gridlock.html

 

 

 

Miliband’s Housing Plans Announced

Published On: April 27, 2015 at 4:18 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Ed Miliband will reveal today the housing changes his party propose. These include not charging Stamp Duty for first time buyers on homes up to £300,000, higher taxes for foreign buyers and up to half of new builds being reserved for local residents.

For those buying their first home, £0 Stamp Duty will benefit nine out of ten people and could save £5,000. Labour announced that this plan would cost £225m per year, which will be funded through tax-related measures.

Miliband's Housing Plans Announced

Miliband’s Housing Plans Announced

Miliband will say: “There’s nothing more British than the dream of homeownership, starting out in a place of your own. But for so many young people today that dream is fading with more people than ever renting when they want to buy, new properties being snapped up before local people get a look-in, young families wondering if this country will ever work for them.

“That is the condition of Britain today, a modern housing crisis which only a Labour government will tackle.” 

Labour also plan to change planning laws that will give priority to first time buyers who have lived in an area for over three years for new local homes. The local first policy will also stop properties being advertised overseas before they’ve been showcased in the UK.

Currently, under George Osborne’s reforms, buyers do not pay Stamp Duty on the first £125,000 of their property’s value and then pay 2% on the next £125,000 and 5% on the following £675,000.

Labour hope to fund their Stamp Duty plans by targeting tax-avoiding landlords, which costs around £550m per year. They will introduce a national register of landlords and cut that figure by 20%. This would create a £100m Treasury fund.

Holding companies that purchase properties for investors would also be tackled with an annual tax increase on enveloped dwellings. Buyers from outside the European Union will be hit by a 3% rise to their Stamp Duty.

Miliband will add: “For the first three years of the next Labour government, we will abolish Stamp Duty for all first time buyers of homes under £300,000. We will start construction of one million homes over the next five years, so at least 200,000 homes a year are getting built by the end of the Parliament with a new generation of towns, garden cities and suburbs, unlocking land being hoarded by large developers, telling them either you use the land, or you lose the land.”1

Local authorities will have the power to charge 100% more Council Tax on properties left empty for a year. Miliband hopes to tackle the private rental sector by introducing rent controls.

Shadow Chancellor, Ed Balls, says: “A Labour Treasury after the election will tackle the housing crisis and back young people aspiring to buy their own home.

“Our fully-funded plan will slash Stamp Duty to zero for first time buyers on properties up to £300,000. This will save money that can instead be put towards a deposit and all the other costs that mount up when you buy a home. And we’ll get more affordable homes built too, with the biggest house-building programme in a generation.”1

1 http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/04/26/stamp-duty-holiday-promised-by-labour-as-well-as-higher-taxes-on-foreign-buyers_n_7148532.html

Why Student Property Investments will Survive the General Election

Published On: April 27, 2015 at 3:48 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

The general election typically causes unrest for property investors who have assets in the UK.

Data from previous election years indicates that many wait until the outcome is announced before buying into the property market. In 2010, there was a 23% rise in house sales in the three months after the result compared to the three previous months.1

It has been claimed that any doubts surrounding investments at this time are unnecessary. However, if you are looking to be completely confident in your investment, student property is the one asset that guarantees security.

Why is student property so safe?

Why Student Property Investments will Survive the General Election

Why Student Property Investments will Survive the General Election

Student accommodation is completely separate from residential and commercial property, meaning that it is not always affected by the economy or housing market. During the economic crisis, student property was the only asset to record growth for every year of the recession.

Market performance

Student property is the UK’s best performing asset class, with £3.3 billion being invested into this sector in the first quarter (Q1) of 2015 alone.1

Furthermore, demand for purpose built student accommodation (PBSA) has never been higher. Despite tuition fees increasing to £9,000 per year in 2012, university enrolment is at record levels, with 659,030 applications at the beginning of this academic year. Over 5m overseas students also study in the UK.1 

International students are known to prefer high-quality PBSA, however, there is a huge undersupply of this type of housing. Most students have to live in the private rental sector, which is not always suitable for them.

Average rents have risen by 3% annually, as students will pay more for PBSA if it is available.1 

Universities will be able to remove the limit to enrolment numbers from September 2015, meaning that demand for this type of property will only increase.

Political policies

When tuition fees increased after the 2010 general election, it was expected that application figures would decline. However, they are at record highs.

This year, three of the main political parties have pledged changes to tuition fees:

  • Labour want to reduce fees to £6,000 per year.
  • The Green Party would get rid of fees completely.
  • UKIP would scrap fees for those studying science, technology, engineering, mathematics and medicine.

Although students could see more changes to their tuition fees, the demand for student accommodation looks set to remain high.

1 http://www.selectproperty.com/2015/04/why-student-property-wont-be-hit-by-the-general-election/