Search Results For: buy to rent sector

Government Not Solving the Housing Crisis

For anyone struggling to get a roof over their head, housing is the biggest social challenge in Britain today. But it is believed that housing policies did not alter the outcome of the general election.

This was not because housing is unimportant to voters, but the political parties did not seem to have a similar approach at tackling the crisis. The divide between housing policies left the public confused at what would be done, and this was particularly the case in London, which has been hit the hardest.

In the capital, the housing crisis has worsened dramatically in the last five years. Property prices have increased 9.5 times faster than wages since 2010 and private rents have grown by 20%, as new housing supply has dropped.

So-called affordable rents are now unaffordable to even middle-income households in nine out of 32 London boroughs.

Government Not Solving the Housing Crisis

Government Not Solving the Housing Crisis

As a result, homelessness and rough sleeping levels have risen, worsened by benefit cuts. Welfare reform and increasing prices have also affected the social set up of the capital. Local Housing Allowance (LHA) claimants have been pushed out of central London boroughs, with claimants in these parts falling by over a quarter. The number of claimants in outer-London areas has risen by 12,600.

Right to Buy

The Right to Buy extension, outlined in the Queen’s Speech yesterday, is thought to be an expensive mistake. The policy is likely to cause a reduction in stock, as tenants buy housing association homes and council properties are sold to fund the policy.

Read more about how it will work here: /right-to-buy-extension-explained/.

And even the Conservatives cannot agree that it is the policy we need, with one advisor commenting: “If we have £4.5 billion to spend on a housing policy, explain to me why aren’t we spending it on more housing?”1

It appears that giving away houses will not be as effective as simply building more, with some arguing that housing association tenants already have a secure home.

Help to Buy

The Conservative manifesto did not emphasise enough the need for increasing supply and therefore balancing prices. Instead, they proposed expanding the Help to Buy scheme and introducing the Help to Buy ISA. The Government is therefore focusing more on the demand issue rather than the root of the problem.

Benefit cuts

Further welfare cuts will put added pressure on low to middle-income families. The plan to cut the benefit cap from £26,000 to £23,000 could move more people out of prime areas, as already seen in London.

Homelessness could also worsen, as housing benefit could be abolished for 18-21-year-olds on Jobseeker’s Allowance.

Private renters

And the Conservative manifesto did not even cover those renting from private landlords. Spiralling rents and poor conditions have been affecting these tenants for years, and they could be in for another tough five years. But how could the Government forget them? There are now 11m private renters that have been overlooked.

There is no Right to Buy for private tenants and no mention of controlling rents or regulating the sector.

The only boost that renters could benefit from would be the substantial increase of new home supply, which would have the best impact generally for all.

1 http://linkis.com/a2mTI

Immigration Bill to be rolled out-response

Published On: May 27, 2015 at 3:27 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

Today, her majesty confirmed the opening of a new Parliament with the annual Queen’s Speech. One of the main announcements was that the Immigration Bill is to be rolled out across the country, after a trial in the West Midlands during last year.

Responding to the announcement, a property professional has raised concerns over the workability of the scheme for thousands of landlords.

Steve Bolton, Founder and Chairman of Platinum Property Partners, also believes that more is to be done to improve standards in the private rented sector.

A step forwards

Mr Bolton commented that, ‘so far only landlords in the West Midlands have been required to check the immigration status of new tenants: however the Queen’s Speech stated that this will now be rolled out nationally. Any landlords who fail to carry out these checks could incur a fine of up to £3,000, so it is vital that the buy-to-let investor community is aware of these changes as soon as they are implemented.’[1]

Immigration Bill to be rolled out-response

Immigration Bill to be rolled out-response

He went on to say, ‘although the checks will involve slightly more admin, they won’t cause a headache for the majority of landlords and will ultimately help to protect their business as well as encourage professionalism in the sector. Only landlords who fail to carry out thorough referencing checks will be troubled by these changes.‘[2]

Bolton also said that, ‘noticeably absent from the Queen’s Speech was any mention of a mandatory licensing scheme for landlords.’ He is of the opinion that, ‘widespread licensing would do even more to raise standards and uncover rogue landlords: but the fees attached to this could impact some landlords financially.’ Finally, he said, ‘any additional legislation must regulate the few bad landlords rather than penalize the majority who provide a good, quality and much-needed service.’[3]

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/landlords/immigration-checks-will-protect-landlords-but-mandatory-licencsing-still-needed.html

 

 

Increase in landlords selling their property

Published On: May 27, 2015 at 11:56 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,

A recent survey has suggested that more landlords are selling their buy-to-let properties, with a rise in sales recorded between March and April.

The Association of Residential Letting Agents (ARLA) surveyed a number of London property owners and found the number of landlords selling their investment home doubled during the month.

Increases

With London agents saying that the number of properties rose from three to six per branch on average, further increases were recorded north of the border. In the same period, Scottish agents saw an average increase of four to seven homes for sale.

ARLA also indicates that 32% of letting agents questioned said that rents had risen during April. Following the outcome of the election, 80% of people believe that rents will rise again during the next five years.[1]

Increase in landlords selling their property

Increase in landlords selling their property

An increase in the number of landlords selling their homes in April is more than likely to be due to political uncertainty, according to ARLA’s managing director David Cox. ‘We know that Labour’s plans with the PRS were unpopular for many landlords and agents, so this increase in those selling their buy-to-let properties may have been a knee jerk reaction to the possibility of Labour’s proposals coming into practice,’ Cox suggested.[1]

Supply-demand

Further data from the investigation shows that supply and demand remained fairly constant in April. Members of ARLA managed 193 properties on average last month, in comparison to 192 during March.

Cox also believes that it is, ‘going to be interesting to see what happens in the market in the next few months following the election result and whether we see an increase in supply of rented accommodation.’ He continued by saying that, ‘hopefully, now the country is under less political uncertainty, we will begin to see the market pick up again and with the policies on offer in both the rental sector and housing market we should see the overall market heading into the right direction.’ [1]

[1] http://www.lettingagenttoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2015/5/more-landlords-selling-their-properties-say-arla-agents

 

Landlords Receive £14 Billion Tax Breaks

Published On: May 26, 2015 at 4:15 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,

In 2013, landlords received a record £14 billion in tax breaks, revealed figures that uncover the expanding buy-to-let market following the financial crisis.

Around £6.3 billion was declared against the cost of mortgage interest alone during the 2012-13 financial year, found HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC).

The data also discovered that the amount of landlords has risen by over a third in the last six years. In the 2012-13 financial year, 2.1m taxpayers declared income from property, up from 1.5m in 2007-08.

Homelessness charity Shelter has called for an “urgent review” of the tax treatment of landlords, who can also deduct the cost of insurance, maintenance and repairs, utility bills, legal fees and other expenses from their income. Owner-occupiers cannot do the same.

Campbell Robb, Chief Executive of Shelter, says: “In the context of looming welfare cuts and a dramatic shortage of homes, all those struggling to keep up with sky-high housing costs will be shocked to hear that a massive £14 billion has been given in tax breaks for landlords in just a year.

“A fraction of this amount would go a long way towards fixing our housing shortage, and giving millions of priced-out families and young people the chance of a stable home.

Landlords Receive £14 Billion Tax Breaks

Landlords Receive £14 Billion Tax Breaks

“In the Queen’s Speech, the new Government must start to set out a comprehensive plan that will finally build the homes this country desperately needs and an urgent review of these huge tax breaks must be part of this.”1

The £6.3 billion tax break for the cost of paying interest on a buy-to-let mortgage is the highest ever, since the Bank of England (BoE) reduced interest rates to 0.5% after the financial crisis.

Mortgage interest relief at source (Miras) was launched in 1983 for homeowners to encourage homeownership. It was abolished in 2000 by then chancellor of the exchequer Gordon Brown, who called it “a middle class perk”1.

However, landlords can still claim mortgage interest as a business expense. Critics say that these tax breaks give landlords a huge financial advantage over ordinary owner-occupiers.

Policy Manager of lobby group Generation Rent, Seb Klier, explains: “When you get a taxpayer subsidy to borrow money, it’s no surprise that more people are choosing to invest in property instead of, say, buying shares in companies, which actually create jobs.

“The tax system also puts landlords at an advantage over potential owner-occupiers when competing for the limited supply of houses and it’s those thwarted first time buyers who end up paying off the mortgage anyway in rents.

“We need to stop subsidising property investment and use that money to build more homes instead.”1

Chief Executive of the National Landlords Association (NLA), Richard Lambert, says that NLA members do not receive unreasonable tax privileges: “Letting out property is a business like any other and is therefore treated and taxed as such, rather than as an investment.

“Landlords are required to pay tax on the profit they make and like any other business, are entitled to offset their costs incurred from the day-to-day running of the property against tax. They don’t receive any special subsidies compared with other businesses.”

Lambert says that previous governments have treated landlords as businesses, which has encouraged better practise in the rental sector. He also reveals that NLA research found 23% of landlords with a single property break even or make a loss.

He adds: “To discriminate against landlords and remove these reliefs, which are offered to other businesses, would cut a swathe through their profitability calculations and prompt many to sell up and invest elsewhere. That would mean even higher rents for those forced to chase after a shrinking pool of rented housing.”1

Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) statistics uncovered that landlords were approved almost as many mortgages as first time buyers in January.

In April, Wriglesworth Consultancy conducted research for the lender Landbay, which discovered that landlords enjoyed 1,400% returns since 1996, much more than the rewards for shares, bonds or cash.

1 http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/may/26/landlords-14bn-tax-breaks-buy-to-let-expansion-mortgage-interest

Ex-council properties proving lucrative

Published On: May 26, 2015 at 3:13 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

The extension of the right-to-buy scheme to housing association properties has led to a number of ex-council flats in London being refurbished and sold on for a tidy rent.

Agents in the swanky borough of Mayfair in the West End of the capital note that they have seen a rising number of former council properties appearing on the luxury letting market.

Rents

Letting agent E J Harris believes that a one-bedroom ex-council property in the area could command a rent of between £350-400 per week, equivalent to £19,200 per year. Furthermore, the same agent believes that a two-bedroom flat could fetch up to £600 per week.

Peter Wetherell, chief executive of his own letting agency, Wetherhell, stated that he had assessed a council apartment for £800,000, where a flat in the building commands a weekly rent of £550.

Commenting on the area, Mr Wetherell said that, ‘when it comes to Mayfair and the wider West End I don’t think there is any stigma with ex-council homes. Mayfair is always a good address of whether it’s a private sector, ex-council or shared ownership property, it’s a place people aspire to live in and are proud to say is their home.’[1]

Wetherell feels that, ‘in a short time we will see the emergence of the multimillion pound ex-council property which shows the extraordinary rise in capital values across Mayfair and the West End currently and over the last 20 years.’[1]

Ex-council properties proving lucrative

Ex-council properties proving lucrative

Generous sizes

Managing director of E J Harris, Elizabeth Harris, believes that former local authority flats in the capital are, ‘nearly always large,’ with, ‘generous room sizes and in superb addresses.’ Harris feels that this makes them a, ‘gold mine for anyone purchasing them, refurbishing them and then using them for rental income.’[1]

Becky Fatemi, managing director of Rokstone, said that she has ex-council properties in areas such as Marylebone and Notting Hill in her portfolio. She suggests that these properties tend to be listed around 20-25% less than the price of private built homes.

‘There are particular ex-council buildings which are seen as iconic and are popular with tenants and purchasers and these include the Luxborough Tower in Marylebone, the Trellick Tower in North Kensington and the Brunswick Centre in Bloomsbury,’ she stated.[1]

[1] http://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/may/26/ex-council-homes-london-gold-mine-landlords

 

 

PRS still needs work despite Tory win

Published On: May 14, 2015 at 4:44 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

The result of last Thursday’s general election seemed to be generally well received within the property sector. However, there are still some that argue a number of uncertainties facing the private rented sector will need be addressed as a matter of urgency.

That is the view of John Stewart, policy manager at the Residential Landlord Association (RLA), who has listed a number of private sector issues that he feels should be high on the Government’s agenda.

Concerns

Firstly, Mr Stewart wants to see a continued rollout across the country of the new proposals from the Immigration Act 2014. This requires landlords and letting agents to check on the immigration status of their tenants, or face hefty fines. The initial trial of the scheme is due to finish this month and Stewart said that the RLA would be conducting its own assessment of the trial by asking landlords for feedback.

Mr Stewart also wants clarification on the proposal to make it a criminal offence to prevent sub-letting as part of a tenancy agreement. He said that his organisation has already raised concerns about these proposals and would expect the government to consult with the private rented sector before pressing ahead with these plans.

PRS still needs work despite Tory win

PRS still needs work despite Tory win

Amongst his other concerns were the proposal to extend the Right to Buy scheme, while additionally lowering the benefits gap. Mr Stewart was very concerned about figures that suggest for every ten council houses sold during the last government, only one was replaced. He believes that if social housing stock continues to fall, more benefit tenants will live in the private rented sector.

Concluding, Mr Stewart warned that, ‘with a majority of only twelve seats and party splits over the European referendum, it is far from certain that David Cameron won’t need allies in other parties. In the short-term, landlords may breathe a sigh of relief, but there could still be choppy waters ahead.’[1]

[1] http://www.rman.co.uk/latest-news/article/prs-could-still-have-choppy-waters-ahead-despite-election-result